NY 161: Overly-Posh Mafia (POSH WIN - NIGHT X)

Majiffy · Post Post #1375 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:05 am

In post 1373, ArcAngel9 wrote:And about theUnderachivers lynch wagon, Again I am not too sure.. It seems like everyone is rushing on his lynch. Is there anything or any quick post that indicates his scum behavior? If so , Can someone be dear and give the post #, please?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p4686729

Plus all his terribad posts after I made the case on him.

Vifam · Post Post #1376 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:09 am

Why is this guy not lynched yet

Majiffy · Post Post #1377 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:14 am

I wonder that to myself every time someone who isn't voting him posts.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #1378 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:24 am

I am torn!!
I can't vote anyone.. I feel it is injustice to vote since i have not being part of game or discussion so far...
so... VOTE: no lynch No idea if that matters in anyway.

Majiffy · Post Post #1379 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:26 am

What the fuck are you even.

Vifam · Post Post #1380 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:26 am

Oh my jesus

Majiffy · Post Post #1381 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:29 am

Let me explain the situation to you, Angel.

We have a limited amount of time to this game. Any time we don't spend during d1 will transfer over to d2, d3, d4, etc.
Each day phase does have a minimum time limit, which I believe is 3 days, but that's really way too little time to discuss anything.
We have only 11 days left of time to roll over to our extra days.
This game has over 20 players.

We need to lynch someone and we need to lynch now.

I've given you a case on UA. Now either refute the case or vote them.

TheReverend · Post Post #1382 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:32 am

In post 1366, TheUnderachivers wrote:In order, the scum are (strongest to weakest) Jacob Savage, Majiffy, Aj the Epic, and Hero (for me).

This stinks. You blatantly picked the most likely targets that might save your ass. I think scum is you plus a few more I haven't figured out yet. Not jiffy, definitely not arc, probably not hero or jacob. AJ and hero maybe. Vifam stinks of town. I feel like I'm getting a feel for the game now. Hurry up and die, scum.

TheReverend · Post Post #1383 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:34 am

In post 1382, TheReverend wrote:probably not hero or jacob. AJ and hero maybe.

lol spot the stoned guy.

Majiffy · Post Post #1384 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:35 am

* Not to mention his second-strongest scum read is backed up by reasoning garnered through "a very light skim" of my ISO, followed by a lot of conjecture.

penguin_alien · Post Post #1385 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:38 am

I hate ArcAngel9's post. This is not a no-lynch situation, and if there weren't more consistently scummy people, I'd want to rake that stance over the coals.

As it stands, Majiffy's summation of the case is persuasive. I don't want to dismiss JacobSavage, as that wall of reads is horrible when coupled with the fact that he was questioning mozamis to get a read on him, yet the best JacobSavage came up with is null. But TheUnderachivers looks pretty scummy, and I don't think we're going to get a better lynch or much more material to chew over relative to the worth of the bankable deadline, so:

UNVOTE: JacobSavage
VOTE: TheUnderachivers

By my count this is L-1.

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #1386 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:39 am

Fine, whatever.
I hope you are all right and he is scum

Unvote

VOTE: TheUnderAchivers

ArcAngel9 · Post Post #1387 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:41 am

In post 1385, penguin_alien wrote:I hate ArcAngel9's post. This is not a no-lynch situation, and if there weren't more consistently scummy people, I'd want to rake that stance over the coals.

As it stands, Majiffy's summation of the case is persuasive. I don't want to dismiss JacobSavage, as that wall of reads is horrible when coupled with the fact that he was questioning mozamis to get a read on him, yet the best JacobSavage came up with is null. But TheUnderachivers looks pretty scummy, and I don't think we're going to get a better lynch or much more material to chew over relative to the worth of the bankable deadline, so:

UNVOTE: JacobSavage
VOTE: TheUnderachivers

By my count this is L-1.

I wasn't comfortable becuz..i needed to be clear when i made a vote.. but anways, i understand the situtation. Let's hope he is scum!!

Majiffy · Post Post #1388 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:42 am

... Next time it's appropriate to wait for a claim before you hammer, yeah?

TheUnderachivers · Post Post #1389 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:44 am

We already did. VT.

TheUnderachivers · Post Post #1390 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:44 am

And now that the lynch is official, time to do that last-minute work.

TheReverend · Post Post #1391 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:45 am

lol no fucking way is she scum

Vifam · Post Post #1392 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:45 am

In post 1386, ArcAngel9 wrote:Fine, whatever.
I hope you are all right and he is scum

Unvote

VOTE: TheUnderAchivers

You are something else

TheUnderachivers · Post Post #1393 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:47 am

In post 1369, Majiffy wrote:Oh yeah, and then you out a bunch of null-town reads.

So...

I mean, good job having everyone as essentially null.

Blatantly false. We have strong reads. Everyone not among the 8 is varying degrees of town. A pool of 8 suspects. Of which, four are scum, two are leaning town, and two leaning scum.

In post 1370, Majiffy wrote:Add to that, the fact that you haven't actually backed up a single read this entire game.

Basically, if you're scum, you're a really bad scum player.
And if you're town, you're a
really
bad town player.

I'm seeing some similar conclusions going on.

This is justifying being on our wagon.
"Well, it's not MY fault I lynched underachivers! They were a bad player!"

Vifam · Post Post #1394 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:48 am

Vifam · Post Post #1395 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:48 am

If you are scum drop the act

TheUnderachivers · Post Post #1396 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:49 am

Plus, in addition to that, he tries to weaken our reads by claiming we haven't backed them up.
We have. Not in great detail, but we've touched upon the reasoning. Nero is VERY fond of implying rather than out-right stating things, and I just plainly suck at out-right stating things and just give the conclusions.

In that regard, we're both similar.

But that's not "not backing up reads", that's us both being bad at adequately vocalizing said reads. Doesn't mean they're any less valid.

TheUnderachivers · Post Post #1397 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:50 am

In post 1395, Vifam wrote:If you are scum drop the act

Thing is, we're not.

So mod damn it, I'm going to keep posting 'til it's locked.

(Also, yay! We made Mafia Scum!)

Majiffy · Post Post #1398 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:50 am

In post 1393, TheUnderachivers wrote:Blatantly false. We have strong reads. Everyone not among the 8 is varying degrees of town. A pool of 8 suspects. Of which, four are scum, two are leaning town, and two leaning scum.

All of your scum reads given earlier were weakly justified or wishy-washy.
Your list of town reads that you gave very recently all had null involved in them somehow.

Those are not strong reads.

In post 1393, TheUnderachivers wrote:This is justifying being on our wagon.
"Well, it's not MY fault I lynched underachivers! They were a bad player!"

Yeah, your point? You deserved it. If you flip town, I will never play a game with you, Mastin.

TheUnderachivers · Post Post #1399 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:50 am

Don't worry Matin, we know that Majiffy and Jacob is scum lets just hope this town is better on day 2.