From his posts in 62 I get the impression McStab would be a jerk regardless though
...Also I'm pretty sure I switched my vote to absta ages ago. >_>
##Vote: absta
readin
In post 614, Plessiezarus wrote:While he had quite a few single liners, in collective, Vifam's posts were very little content relevant
In post 614, Plessiezarus wrote:but I thought Vifam was scummy and BT has carried the same trend
In post 614, Plessiezarus wrote:My impression of BTs catchup in #394 was that it read fake; his thoughts on TGAH didn't read to me like the natural train of thought of someone trying to discern a player's alignment. Didn't like much of #456 either; felt that his jump on McStab could have well come from somebody feeling the urge to bus and thought that he was giving Arthur an easy pass for stuff that wasn't alignment indicative.
In post 614, Plessiezarus wrote:Everyone else is essentially null still (though we're conflicted on BT/Vifam Pless thinks BT's townish
In post 625, Shadoweh wrote:
...Also I'm pretty sure I switched my vote to absta ages ago. >_>
##Unvote
##Vote: absta
readin
In post 612, TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:In post 496, Plessiezarus wrote:TGAH -- according to 125 / 141, both your heads have (had?) a town-read on Dayne. How and why did you come to this read?
the terrible attempted wagon on him for the rp. easy target is easy. didn't i already say this?
In post 619, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Wait tammy fill me in on zar-meta in the marvel game (that's the one he played and I'm assuming he was town in?)
In post 614, Plessiezarus wrote:Since people hate Pless' walls, apparently, we'll look at what we think the main points against our scum-reads are in a series of posts.
In post 614, Plessiezarus wrote:Since people hate Pless' walls, apparently, we'll look at what we think the main points against our scum-reads are in a series of posts.
feel like attempts to not have to create their own content. (It's much easier to respond to points others give you than it is to attempt to forge ahead in a vacuum.)In post 489, TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:I’m going to catch up with everything, hopefully, before I head out to work today. If there is anything that people would specifically like me to address please let me know.
In post 614, Plessiezarus wrote:Since people hate Pless' walls, apparently, we'll look at what we think the main points against our scum-reads are in a series of posts.
In post 482, ChannelDelibird wrote:Lynching your suspects' preferred target tells you nearly as much about them as it does the dead guy, Shadoweh, so not convinced by you dismissing it like that.
In post 311, ChannelDelibird wrote:I'd be very strongly considering a vote on Jason but Sotty and Zach have never given me reason to doubt their reads on him.
In post 634, Baby Spice wrote:Plez, what was Zar's silly stuff
In post 394, BT wrote:Don't like Jason #122;SAD has some stuff outside of RP to look at at that pointyet the focus is still on "omg stop your scum-motivated rp"
In post 630, Plessiezarus wrote:"I'm assuming"? Are you claiming you didn't read the Marvel game?
In post 641, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:In post 630, Plessiezarus wrote:"I'm assuming"? Are you claiming you didn't read the Marvel game?
No? I wasn't in it, so naturally if it meant I didn't have time to play it, I didn't have time to read it
In post 643, Plessiezarus wrote:Can't tell if you're honestly forgetful or if you're just playing it up as an excuse to misread Zar.
In post 397, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Cerulean (Tammy/Empire hydra)
Benmage
camn
McStab
The Mini-Librarian
VifamBT
ChannelDelibird
Baby Spice
^ These people are town btw except maybe Baby Spice.
In post 645, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:In post 643, Plessiezarus wrote:Can't tell if you're honestly forgetful or if you're just playing it up as an excuse to misread Zar.
How so? (explain the latter?). Wouldn't I just not mention it at all instead of asking Tammy to fill me in on his meta from that game?
It's all about context. You tried to come across non-committed to it so that if you got called out for role fishing you'd have an alibi. But you managed to get swayed by one small, two or three sentence post that doesn't even address that issue solely?