In post 420, jasonT1981 wrote:<snip>
Hi you still haven't responded to my 351, any thoughts/comments/etc would be greatly appreciated kthx.
In post 420, jasonT1981 wrote:<snip>
In post 420, jasonT1981 wrote:His points are rubbish against me, and truthfully if that is all you got, go home son.... nothing for you here.
Also this looks really fake. Town either suspect the people town-reading them or accept the town read because it's right (but who cares if it's for the wrong reasons). Scum usually always accept any town read or they can challenge it to make themselves look even more town (the WIFOM part I guess).If you're gonna put me as town, it better be for a damn good reason.
In post 429, ChannelDelibird wrote:OK, in that page McStab pretty strongly deviated from what I would have expected based on our previous game. Still prefer the SAD wagon for now though.
This is a question from town.In post 326, petapan wrote:SAD do you think that people townreading you are just naive or possibly scum who are faking reads
In post 429, ChannelDelibird wrote:OK, in that page McStab pretty strongly deviated from what I would have expected based on our previous game.
In post 349, DeasVail wrote:In post 323, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:If you're gonna put me as town, it better be for a damn good reason.
See this attitude is something I find much more likely from scum trying to be cool and all than town.
In post 431, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:In post 429, ChannelDelibird wrote:OK, in that page McStab pretty strongly deviated from what I would have expected based on our previous game. Still prefer the SAD wagon for now though.
SAD =/= SD. Unless you secretly have a scumread on me
In post 368, petapan wrote:for real though why are people ignoring safetydance
In post 411, McStab wrote:This may be OMGUS but I think he's been trying to drift under the radar, so I'd be into a Plessie wagon if it forms
In post 403, camn wrote:I am not convinced on Jasonscum. It certainly could be that he is fooling me, but I generally feel confident on my gut reads of Jason.
In re: my so-called "obsession"..... if that's gonna keep getting mentioned, I would like someone to point out where it actually happened. I am officially telling you that it was just a question, and one I would want answered any time someone displays a weird post-style. But to spin it as "obsession "...... It does occur to me to wonder why anyone would spin it that way So cite, please. Or retract.
In post 358, jasonT1981 wrote:
see this is whatb I dont understand about my wagon, lots of Jason is scum... he is scum because of wall posts... but actually shit all explaining as to why I am scum.
In post 368, petapan wrote:for real though why are people ignoring safetydance
In post 370, Benmage wrote:In post 369, Baby Spice wrote:Really not appreciating Tammy wall quoting.
YEAH f**K tammy
In post 409, Plessiezarus wrote:Don't understand this comment. Please explain. Are you disagreeing with TML's claim that absta looks worse than SafetyDance, or are you suggesting there's no hope of SafetyDance ever "contributing something good"?
In post 409, Plessiezarus wrote:Right now, which of the two do you think looks more likely to be scum?
In post 409, Plessiezarus wrote:What makes you think Baby Spice is town?
In post 409, Plessiezarus wrote:Did you have a town-read on TML before your 396, and if so, why? (Is it because of his 390, is what I guess I'm really asking.)
In post 409, Plessiezarus wrote:Or a town-read on Vifam before he replaced out? (Though the manner of his replace-out does seem townish, actually, so maybe that's a good read after all.)
In post 409, Plessiezarus wrote:For someone who insists early town-reads on him are "hilariously naive", you seem to have quite a few naive reads yourself.
In post 443, Cerulean wrote:In post 368, petapan wrote:for real though why are people ignoring safetydance
Why are you so focused on it? He is scummy but scum? Not so sure, why aren't ou trying to figure that out?
In post 405, Cerulean wrote:In post 378, petapan wrote:so vote safetydance, he's still voting SAD when SAD is clearly contributing and playing the game and isn't RPing as much, and is just trying to justify his crap vote instead of moving forward and saying anything meaningful
I don't know dude, I thought Safety's first two posts were really bad but I just read his recent posting and I'm getting the same vibes I got from Nostedeus - basically, that he's just incompetent and not really scummy. I don't think him trying to push a policy-type lynch on Arthur and justifying it is really that bad given his inexperience and how much negative attention he drew from it earlier. Plus, I thought the way he lashed out at TML in #304 with the whole "don't pigeonhole me" type stuff was pretty genuine and townish. I haven't talked to Tammy about him yet though (I think she might still be scumreading him?) and I do agree that he does need to involve himself a little more in scumhunting than self-defense at this stage.
P.S.: Answer this pls (though change the Vifam question to "Why do you think Vifam might be scum?")
In post 405, Cerulean wrote:In post 378, petapan wrote:so vote safetydance, he's still voting SAD when SAD is clearly contributing and playing the game and isn't RPing as much, and is just trying to justify his crap vote instead of moving forward and saying anything meaningful
I don't know dude, I thought Safety's first two posts were really bad but I just read his recent posting and I'm getting the same vibes I got from Nostedeus - basically, that he's just incompetent and not really scummy. I don't think him trying to push a policy-type lynch on Arthur and justifying it is really that bad given his inexperience and how much negative attention he drew from it earlier. Plus, I thought the way he lashed out at TML in #304 with the whole "don't pigeonhole me" type stuff was pretty genuine and townish. I haven't talked to Tammy about him yet though (I think she might still be scumreading him?) and I do agree that he does need to involve himself a little more in scumhunting than self-defense at this stage.
P.S.: Answer this pls (though change the Vifam question to "Why do you think Vifam might be scum?")