Mini #381-Werewolf: Cancelled


Echo419
Echo419
Goon
Echo419
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: June 3, 2006
Location: Finding Nemo

Post Post #200 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:07 am

Post by Echo419 »

Unvote, Vote: Lowell
Show
yeah, they're totally buying it.

oops, wrong window.

"Whoops, was that hammer?"- Pretty much everyone, at some point.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #201 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:15 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Actually, because he's becoming an annoyance
Unvote: Lowell, Vote: Jack
. He's around because he already posted post-crash, but he doesn't respond to the inquiries behind his statements.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Rathyr
Rathyr
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rathyr
Goon
Goon
Posts: 888
Joined: May 17, 2006
Location: USA

Post Post #202 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:55 am

Post by Rathyr »

Shit.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #203 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:13 pm

Post by Jack »

Echo419 wrote:
Vote: Lowell
Echo419 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Lowell
Echo419 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Lowell
What the christ?
Vote:Echo419
[/b]
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #204 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:31 pm

Post by Jack »

I find Conflux suspicious because of his hammer vote and then "unvote" round one, and general lurking.

Echo and Coolbot have persistantly persued Lowell and voted him over the watchman claim thing, even though I've said throughout I agree with Lowell on this...I don't see why they aren't voting me. Personally I find Lowell to very townie. They were also all over the StallingChamp lynch (granted several other people were as well) and he turned out to be town.

Echo has also voted Lowell 3 times in a row which is odd.
Echo419
Echo419
Goon
Echo419
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: June 3, 2006
Location: Finding Nemo

Post Post #205 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:42 pm

Post by Echo419 »

I was hoping someone would notice I was revoting and start a discussion. Which you did.
Lowell is the proponent of the plan. Not only that, but we've had a lot from him and not much from you.
SC was messed up, scumclaim, etc. Reading over, in fact, Lowell was on that train more than I was- I was voting Lowell most of the time.
Where is that perfect32487 guy?
Show
yeah, they're totally buying it.

oops, wrong window.

"Whoops, was that hammer?"- Pretty much everyone, at some point.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #206 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:45 pm

Post by Jack »

Still, why were you voting Lowell based just off the watchmen thing? That doesn't make sense to me. It just looks like you think you can get him lynched from that.
User avatar
CoolBot
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2340
Joined: February 24, 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Post Post #207 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:54 pm

Post by CoolBot »

Jack wrote:I don't see why they aren't voting me.
We can't vote multiple people. And trust me, you're next on the list.

As an aside, didn't night fall?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #208 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:19 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Unvote: Jack, Vote: conflux
. Let's see if he's still around.
CoolBot wrote:As an aside, didn't night fall?
It did, but it appears Echo's unvote/vote momentarily confused the moderator; I'm curious if anyone else happened to see the results besides myself - I personally wasn't going to divulge the information, but I suppose it may (unfortunately) call for a mod kill or something.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #209 (ISO) » Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:20 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

And I say "unfortnately," not to hint at any player's alignment, but simply because it's a bummer when intervention has to be made on the mod's part.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
CoolBot
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2340
Joined: February 24, 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Post Post #210 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:22 am

Post by CoolBot »

unvote: Lowell
vote: Jack


So I wasn't mistaken about the night post. I can't continue as if I don't know the result of the lynch. So on to Jack, who was basically begging for a vote anyway.
User avatar
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318
Joined: July 25, 2006

Post Post #211 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:03 am

Post by Lowell »

Uh, what did I miss? What is going on here?
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #212 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:19 am

Post by Jack »

Why are you voting me Coolbot?
User avatar
Rathyr
Rathyr
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rathyr
Goon
Goon
Posts: 888
Joined: May 17, 2006
Location: USA

Post Post #213 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:09 am

Post by Rathyr »

OK trouble has happened.

One: Conflux just PMed me saying that he has a virus or something that prevents him from posting.

Two: I mistakenly ended the day and several people saw Lowell's alignment.

Three: After the server crash, it seems many of the players have deserted us.


So.

What are we going to do? I am reluctant to modkill lots of players, and I don't know if replacements are the best idea.

You could just keep playing and see what happens, I guess. Any ideas?
Echo419
Echo419
Goon
Echo419
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: June 3, 2006
Location: Finding Nemo

Post Post #214 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:49 am

Post by Echo419 »

I didn't see the alignment, although if players did it might be somewaht broken. Maybe randomize Lowell's alignment again?
Sorry for confusing you, Raythr, I was just trying to get people to start posting :(
Show
yeah, they're totally buying it.

oops, wrong window.

"Whoops, was that hammer?"- Pretty much everyone, at some point.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #215 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:14 am

Post by Jack »

Not a fan of randomizing...would be weird to have to start from scratch with someone on page nine.

I guess I just want to know if I was right or not.
User avatar
CoolBot
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2340
Joined: February 24, 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Post Post #216 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:53 am

Post by CoolBot »

I saw Lowell's alignment, and I don't think it's fair that only some of us know it. He's innocent. Apparently, his plan wasn't designed to hurt the town, though it certainly does.

I changed my vote to Jack because he's also backing Lowell's plan even after others argued against it.

I want to continue with the game as is, though Rathyr should consult with mods not affiliated with this game to see what the fairest thing to do is. I suspect that would be modkilling Lowell and moving to night.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #217 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:11 pm

Post by Jack »

So wait. Lowell proposed a plan. You voted him because of it. He was innocent.

I agreed with Lowells plan. You vote me?

That makes no sense. I also find it suspect that you seem eager to have Lowell modkilled.
User avatar
Rathyr
Rathyr
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rathyr
Goon
Goon
Posts: 888
Joined: May 17, 2006
Location: USA

Post Post #218 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:26 pm

Post by Rathyr »

Yeah, just continue for now.

I don't really feel the need to kill lowell, since he's just going to die tonight.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #219 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:32 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Or
is
he? Wouldn't the watchman just target him? Personally, I think a modkill of Lowell and keeping the day going would be fairest.

Who all isn't posting since the crash that isn't virus infected?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Echo419
Echo419
Goon
Echo419
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: June 3, 2006
Location: Finding Nemo

Post Post #220 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:48 pm

Post by Echo419 »

Let's see. That perfect123789 guy never checked back after saying he had connection problems, conflux has a virus... who else... trabony?
So what are we going to do? My best lead is gone, and the game has gone a bit chaotic. Maybe we should pretend there was a one-shot day cop who targeted Lowell, or something?
Show
yeah, they're totally buying it.

oops, wrong window.

"Whoops, was that hammer?"- Pretty much everyone, at some point.
User avatar
CoolBot
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CoolBot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2340
Joined: February 24, 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Post Post #221 (ISO) » Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:03 pm

Post by CoolBot »

Jack wrote:you seem eager to have Lowell modkilled.
I am not eager for Lowell to be modkilled; I simply stated that I thought that was the fairest way to go. I don't know how you got that I was pushing for it, except by deliberate misrepresentation.
Jack wrote:I agreed with Lowells plan. You vote me?
Lowell made a mistake; that's for sure. His mistake doesn't exonerate you for pushing a plan that would hurt the town.
User avatar
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318
Joined: July 25, 2006

Post Post #222 (ISO) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 3:55 am

Post by Lowell »

Let Lowell Live! Let Lowell Live!

[let's hear it, people...]

LET LOWELL LIVE! LET LOWELL LIVE!


... incidentally, my personal opinion is that this game in inexorably ruined. Just my thoughts....
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #223 (ISO) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:37 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I wouldn't be against shutting the game down and restarting the sign up list for a redo, giving current active players a spot in the lineup. It's not like we didn't know the role setup already, so I don't see any technical, game-related problems to this.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #224 (ISO) » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:04 am

Post by Jack »

Sounds good to me.

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”