In post 1461, SafetyDance wrote:
TBG and CD have as of yet, claimed if those cards have contained any power (leave that for now) but we have Jal and Monkey both claiming to have gotten vig cards. This means that, presuming Baby or UN didn't have both cards, they'd have had one each. If scum killed like they do every game, it means one didn't shoot and one did. Using Cheery Dog's tracking of UN, he didn't go anywhere so that would mean Baby killed UN and UN didn't shoot, whilst scum killed Baby.
That's the scenario I see based on the claims ("facts") we have.Anything wrong with it?
Plenty.
1. You assume that there is only one scum faction.
2. You assume at least one town vig used their power.
3. You assume that there was no role interference by either scum denial or town protective.
Assuming that the expensive properties actually do give vig powers (this I consider true) I still think that most likely neither vig shot, the SK killed UN and mafia (or only very slightly possibly, a vig) killed Baby Spice.
Your equanimity is acceptable. I'll set aside this fillip.
In post 1470, Mehdi2277 wrote:And tbg either scum are dumb are they already know who to shoot. The worth of keeping town reads hidden to block scum shooting people most trusted isn't worth it. Are docs just randomly guessing who to protect as well? And does becoming scum make it impossible to tell who looks more town then others?
I am opposed to massclaim today. It is far too early in the game.
Also, this is ridiculous:
NumberQ was town.
In post 387, numberQ wrote:Sorry for being so late to the party, but I'm all caught up now.
I have one question: Why did Lurker's claim make so many people back off? So, what, he says he's a watcher and suddenly you believe him?What about his post-claim actions changed your mind?
Also, take a look at the mini-theme queue, at the post that introduces Monopoly Mafia. I didn't find this info in the first post of this thread. It says that deeds are randomized AFTER alignments are given. Lurker could be a watcher, but also scum.
In post 430, numberQ wrote:Lurker:
Before the claim, his content amounted to an analysis of his own wagon (though unless I read it wrong he didn't even supply any opinions of his own), a case on Mhork (which is weak, but that's already been discussed), and a few statements that almost sound like the beginnings of some investigation but stop before they go anywhere (see: 76, 89).
Then he claimed, and for some reason people forgot that the game explicitly stated that cards (ie, powers) are randomized after alignment assignments, meaning alignment has nothing to do with powers. On top of that, the claim was strange because he waited until someone specifically asked him about it to mention his Watcher role.
Post-claim Lurker has been IIoA and a promise to look at the SC issue, though he's posted since that promise without having looked at the issue.
....
So yeah Lurker should be lynched.
VOTE: Lurker
That's well ahead of either Lurker's slip in #656 or Jal's catch in #674.
In post 1411, MonkeyMan576 wrote:hammering me would be a bad idea. I'm town so as far as I'm aware my cards are distributed among those on my lynch. So I'm guessing Cherry Dog is scum. This is a scum-like risk, not a town-like risk.
In post 1421, MonkeyMan576 wrote:People should unvote me unless they want Boardwalk in the hands of ScumDog and his cohorts.
In post 1441, MonkeyMan576 wrote:ScumCherry hamming would allow Boardwalk to possibly change hands from town to mafia. I haven't done anything scummy, besides not having a lot of time to answer questions. CheeryDog HAS done something specifically scummy now.
UNVOTE: Cheery Dog
VOTE: MonkeyMan576
That should be L-1 again.