1) I'm fairly convinced one of our revivals is scum.M4yhem wrote: Bah. Nobody trusts me.
Zindaras, any reason you want to be revived so bad?
2) I'm not getting town vibes from
3) I know I'm town.
1) I'm fairly convinced one of our revivals is scum.M4yhem wrote: Bah. Nobody trusts me.
Zindaras, any reason you want to be revived so bad?
The fact that people seemed a tiny bit too eager to revive you. Tamuz hardly posted the first few pages.Yosarian2 wrote:Zindaras wrote: 1) I'm fairly convinced one of our revivals is scum.
And what are you basing this conviction on?
Yeah; once it looked like I was going to be revived, several people quickly jumped on my bandwagon. Like I said early in the game, if it looks like a good guy is going to be revived, I wouldn't be surprised to see scum quickly jump on the wagon, both in order to look more pro-town and to buddy up with someone who's going to have one of three votes on day 1.Zindaras wrote:The fact that people seemed a tiny bit too eager to revive you. Tamuz hardly posted the first few pages.Yosarian2 wrote:Zindaras wrote: 1) I'm fairly convinced one of our revivals is scum.
And what are you basing this conviction on?
I downplayed your exaggeration, not the connection. Obviously you tried to make it seem important when I called you out on it. In fact, I find it it interesting that you find the need to exaggerate in order to prevent my revival. If my actions are scummy enough, then why need to make it bigger?M4yhem wrote:Hi Zindaras
C_D- What I find interesting is the way you seem to be playing down your connection to Thoth. This is in contrast to the way Yos straight-up admitted that he looked more favorably on Al_Ko because they agreed with each other. Why would you want to play down your connection to Thoth? I wonder...
Some of your remarks are bordering on flamebaiting again, which is odd because I thought I was being polite-ish when I addressed you.
Anyway, the main arguement against Crashy is the Dummie/Mr.Cesar interaction. So what do you make of that?
You don't sound very happy, but most of this is pretty much the hard truth.chaotic_diablo wrote: CrashTextDummie: logic deficiency, revive Mr.C? no way
yellowbounder: lack of post
Thoth: lack of posts
M4yhem: egotistic, "I'm the only good candidate for revival!"
al_kohaulec: indecisive, 5-10 pages of stuff that all ended with "screw this"
Twito: lack of posts
themanhimself: questionable claim
chaotic_diablo: jerk, screw you
lordy: not enough contribution
Mr. César: don't ask
I don't think we should go for somebody neither of you two support, a common scum tactic is to distance yourself from your allies, and if you're town, the reason you may be looking away from players you don't support is probably because you're picking up on scumtells from them.Tamuz wrote:I'd recommend to the town choosing someone who neither Yos or I support (Mainly Yos from my perspective, but I sympathize with the town, so someone I don't support as well) so that there is a smaller chance of us losing so quickly.
Of course, I understand opposal to this reccomendation.
I'll come back and reread Pg 10 because I haven't read closely or addressed anything from this page forth.
Another reason they may be looking away is because the unsupported think differently. That's the whole point on picking someone who they don't support; we don't really want all jack***es or all smart***es judging. We need to have a mix between the two for balance. People with like minds we have a hard time thinking up of changes.al_ko wrote:I don't think we should go for somebody neither of you two support, a common scum tactic is to distance yourself from your allies, and if you're town, the reason you may be looking away from players you don't support is probably because you're picking up on scumtells from them.
Okay.ChannelDelibird wrote:Clarification:No Revive is not a valid vote.
It's basically the same plan as Al's from yesterday; we revive a limbo-cop and then revive a doc to keep the limbo cop safe, while the cop investigates. That way even if there is a scum alive, the cop gets at least two investigations, and if there's not we almost certanly win.Zindaras wrote:I've seen the questions and will respond when I find time to do a full re-read.
Okay.ChannelDelibird wrote:Clarification:No Revive is not a valid vote.
This is quite irrelevant though. Limbo-cop only has to investigate an innocent guy during two nights to win.
If there is one.
Would like to hear opinions on that particular plan, for which we must assume we've revived two townies.
Nothing would please me more.lordy wrote: Could you please kindly explain why you, of all people, should be revived when there are so many townies around?
This is the first post that caught my eye. I do not like chaotic_diablo. (reasons for that later)Yosarian2 wrote:Well, if we're going to figure out who are scum and who are good guys, we're going to have to start leaving a voting record. I've still got a bit of a pro-town feeling about CD, like I said yesterday, and as that's the strongest hunch I've got at the moment I might as well back that up with avote:chaotic diablo.
Yos follows a scummy paragraph up with a paragraph that I like.On another note, we still haven't heard from lordy and Mr. Cesar at all, and we've only heard from yellow once. I would suggest that we not revive anyone today untill all three either start posting or get replaced. After all, if we don't get a voting record on certain people before day 1, and they stay in limbo, we won't get a voting record from them after day 1 either.
Uh-huh. Saying he's okay with Thoth, but not really stating any reasons.chaotic_diablo wrote:I'm willing to consider Thoth though.
I don't like this post.lordy wrote:Right now:
-I think yos revival was good one. We need to get clear, sensible townies into the living world
-I'dvote:al_kohaulec
-I'd stay off mayhem as he seems rather scummy, looking overeager to impress yet his ideas would fail.
Huh? c_d voted Yos earlier in the game.Tamuz wrote:It may be the psychological effect of c_d looking beneficially towards him, but I think he would make a good counter-point to Yos and is likely as not scum if Yos is so he is who I'd consider a safe placement in order to get diversity alive.
I do not like this vote at all.al_kohaulec wrote:I think as it stands right now, Thoth is my favorite choice for revival.
Vote: Thoth
More Thoth voting.chaotic_diablo wrote:At the moment, Thoth is on top with Tamuz second. No one else is on the list yet, but I'll add more.
vote Thoth
I wanted to restate this post because of his alko point.CrashTextDummie wrote:That said, here are the people I will NOT support at this time:
Tamuz (he's too overeager for my liking)
themanhimself (for getting cold feet)
al_kohaulec (for reasons I'd like to keep to myself at the moment)
Everyone else I could be convinced to vote.
Thanks.al_kohaulec wrote:I've thought about some of those too, but it simply doesn't help us to speculate that much because at that point it gets to where just about anything could happen and it really won't end up helping us.
For example, in day one of the last game I was in, one player claimed "I require two votes more than the majority to be lynched, and when I reach the normal majority to be lynched, I gain some ability, I don't know what it is though." Everybody speculated on so many different possibilities, including "He's going to be lynched and revived later in the game with a uber ability that will PWN US ALL!" This really got us nowhere, it turns out he was simply a jester. It's just an example of how when nearly anything is possible, looking at everything that's possible doesn't get us any further, and acting upon very unlikely possibilities is worse. Some people wanted to lynch him because he was scum, others to give his ability, and some were afraid to vote him at all for reasons that he could be scum who'd come back to life with insane abilities. The latter is horrible logic because if he's scum, he needs to die nonetheless, and a future revival with insane powers is unlikely, and you can't just let people live based on such unlikely events.
(Now I"m rambling, so I'll stop. That same game ended up having no mafia, 2 cults (one leader didn't know he was recruiting), 2 SKs, 1 backup SK, 1 triggered SK, 2 self-aligned players, a town aligned who lost if he died, over half a dozen useless docs and other useless roles, and a townie who had a trigger that changed what a player's alignment would show up as on death. Ya, it was a fun game.)
This post set off an alarm. Not liking c_d, as stated before. Throwing in a player who was very unlikely to be revived to not make it seem he was supporting c_d only would be a good idea.CrashTextDummie wrote:You guys are all sissys. Let's bandwagon chaotic_diablo and Mr. C and get this day over with.
I was going to quote alko's post at first, but CTD already provided the counter-argument.CrashTextDummie wrote:This has got to be the most ridiculous reason not to revive someone ever. What's your plan, champ? Leave all the power roles in the safety of limbo untill they don't matter anymore? We don't know what role, if any, Mr. C has. According to his word, he HAS to be revived. Why, we don't know. The mafia doesn't know either, so they don't know if he is worth a hit. Therefore, he's a pretty perfect revival candidate, if you ask me. There are only two reasons I hear to justify not reviving him, and they're both flawedal_kohaulec wrote:CDT, remember this about Mr. C. He could be hinting at being a power role. Now let's assume he is one. We revive him, but he doesn't claim, we don't know for sure. He's revived, but we probably won't have a doc. Night hits. Mafia kills Mr. C. BIG power role dead. So even if Mr. C. is protown, how do we benefit from his revival on the off chance that we do happen to also revive scum?