Mini 1397: War is Hell (Game Over)

Kinetic · Post Post #1650 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:48 am

As it stands, one of three things happened:

One) I was right, and still am, and Matt, Xalxe, and LLD are the three scum
Two) I was wrong about there being any scum mechanic that is different in this game. Thus, the remaining scum must be within Quiford/Albert, Tierce, or KKB. As KKB is pretty much confirmed after 1v1 on LLD, it would mean that if there is no scum mechanic the scum must be Tierce and Quiford/Albert.
Three) There is a scum mechanic I am not sure of, but is most likely similar to rage, but doesn't cause hurt/heals to go on cooldown. In that case, no one is confirmed saved KKB. Hell, it could very well be they gain rage just the same as us, except theirs doesn't cause cooldowns. Actually... that might make more sense. If that's the case, I might be able to puzzle out some suspects, given some time to read back and see where the rage is.

Kinetic · Post Post #1651 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:51 am

It will take me a couple days though to do so. I'm leaving to visit family over the holiday tomorrow, and I'm packing most of the day today. I'll have internet access though, but I probably won't get to a real full read until the weekend or right after.

MattP · Post Post #1652 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:48 am

In post 1649, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1648, MattP wrote:Kinetic is obvie townziebears and quadz is scummy but I haven't read kinetics theory yet but by this point I assume anything in kinetics theory is wrong anyway

If he's town, why would his theories be wrong?

I am not even saying this to be rude, but I'm seriously unsure if you're trying to seem stupid for town cred

Xalxe · Post Post #1653 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:52 am

In post 1652, MattP wrote:
In post 1649, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1648, MattP wrote:Kinetic is obvie townziebears and quadz is scummy but I haven't read kinetics theory yet but by this point I assume anything in kinetics theory is wrong anyway

If he's town, why would his theories be wrong?

I am not even saying this to be rude, but I'm seriously unsure if you're trying to seem stupid for town cred

On further reflection, that post was worded poorly. Maybe try this: if you believe he's town, why aren't you willing to consider his theory? Is it just because it names you as scum?

Tierce · Post Post #1654 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:23 am

Yo. Just woke up, will still be V/LAish through today and the coming days. Looked at the first post (i.e. Yos and LLD), but haven't even skimmed otherwise.

MattP · Post Post #1655 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:38 am

In post 1653, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1652, MattP wrote:
In post 1649, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1648, MattP wrote:Kinetic is obvie townziebears and quadz is scummy but I haven't read kinetics theory yet but by this point I assume anything in kinetics theory is wrong anyway

If he's town, why would his theories be wrong?

I am not even saying this to be rude, but I'm seriously unsure if you're trying to seem stupid for town cred

On further reflection, that post was worded poorly. Maybe try this: if you believe he's town, why aren't you willing to consider his theory? Is it just because it names you as scum?

I don't understand how you find this question any more logical than the last

MattP · Post Post #1656 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:57 am

You're asking me why I don't agree with a theory that would according to kinetic make me undeniable scum when I'm town

As if that's something that merits discussion

It's very adorable to see how you allocate your scumhunting time

quadz08 · Post Post #1657 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:58 am

Not to mention "this person is town why don't you agree with him?" is a stupid line of inquiry to begin with.

MattP · Post Post #1658 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:00 am

It seems like xalxe has literally NOTHING worth discussing and that he has NO scumreads as of this point

That is a scumtell at this point in a game

Kinetic take the wool off from over your eyes

MattP · Post Post #1659 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:01 am

And xalxe accusing me of being wrong for my opinion of kinetics theory when that same theory also confirms xalxe of being scum and he has NO qualm with that is absolute hilarity

MattP · Post Post #1660 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:03 am

When xalxe and LLD are both flipped scum PLEASE keep calling me scum, I dare you kinetic

Xalxe · Post Post #1661 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:25 am

In post 1658, MattP wrote:It seems like xalxe has literally NOTHING worth discussing and that he has NO scumreads as of this point

Isn't ignoring my posts

fun

?

Mr. Flay · Post Post #1662 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:32 pm

The sonorous gonging of a bell vibrates down to your bones, cartilage, and adamantine skeletons... Hell trembles with the elemental force of the burst of energy as it washes over the stunned battlefield, leaving you all feeling refreshed and somewhat stronger.

Second Damage Tally of Epoch V:

Xalxe
is at 1 HP below normal maximum.
MattP
,
kanyeknowsbest
,
quadz08
,
Tierce
,
Zdenek
,
Kinetic
, and
Quilford
are all at 1 HP above normal maximum.

quadz08 · Post Post #1663 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:41 pm

where uhhhh

why is LLD not on that list?

quadz08 · Post Post #1664 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:42 pm

wow holy shit

braaaaaaaaaaaaain

ignore last post please

Xalxe · Post Post #1665 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:43 pm

In post 1662, Mr. Flay wrote:Xalxe is at 1 HP below normal maximum.

Does anyone know why this is? I don't, and it didn't say that a minute ago.

Quilford · Post Post #1666 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:44 pm

In post 1629, MattP wrote:In case my hurt didn't go through because it was too late

Hurt: Xalxe

Your other Hurt went through, so this one definitionally cannot.

That's THREE points on him

Mr. Flay · Post Post #1667 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:46 pm

It was there in 1635 too, you just missed it

(and I missed it for a second this time, stupid spreadsheet)

.

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #1668 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:00 pm

In post 1646, kanyeknowsbest wrote:
In post 1642, quadz08 wrote:Just ISOed LLD

Kanye, I want you to explain why you were watching LLD.

why?

this wasnt an optional question btw.

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #1669 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:02 pm

in case it wasnt clear, id like to know why this was a line of inquiry you were interested in and what information you hoped to gain from it

quadz08 · Post Post #1670 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:27 pm

I want to know what about LLD made you think she'd be a good watching target.

quadz08 · Post Post #1671 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:28 pm

I want an understanding of the thought processes that made you pick her.

Kinetic · Post Post #1672 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:19 am

In post 1660, MattP wrote:When xalxe and LLD are both flipped scum PLEASE keep calling me scum, I dare you kinetic

And when Xalxe is town? Like I'm pretty sure he is?

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #1673 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:53 am

In post 1670, quadz08 wrote:I want to know what about LLD made you think she'd be a good watching target.

In post 1671, quadz08 wrote:I want an understanding of the thought processes that made you pick her.

yes but my question is why. of what use is this information to you?

Kinetic · Post Post #1674 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:55 am

In post 1673, kanyeknowsbest wrote:
In post 1670, quadz08 wrote:I want to know what about LLD made you think she'd be a good watching target.

In post 1671, quadz08 wrote:I want an understanding of the thought processes that made you pick her.

yes but my question is why. of what use is this information to you?

I'm assuming he either A) wants to know if you saw something specifically scummy that would make sense from the scum group, or B) you can't answer it and that was an elaborate bussing strat to confirm you. Could you please stop avoiding the question and just answer it, its getting old and going nowhere.