In post 1403, Mantisdreamz wrote: In post 1391, borkjerfkin wrote:VOTE: Mantis
Look at 1270 compared to 1348. I think I posted once between those two posts and Mantis flip flopped on me in that time.
that is the result of me flip flopping (as i've said already before)
i went from thinking shrimp & you to maybe shrimp & mala. you'll note that's where i said 'i'd lynch malakittens.' in post 1349.
to be honest, i'm really not used to the length of these days. i'm used to 24 hour days, and even with those you tend to flip flop a little. multiple that by 20 and there's going to be a lot of back and forth.
i can say with confidence that i definitely don't want to lynch Adam or Levi, and probably Pro-Hawk.
i'm just reading over some ISO's right now...
I get flip-flopping; I'm not calling you scummy for flip-flopping; I'm calling you scummy for flip-flopping without any stimulus -- I didn't do anything during that time that should have changed your opinion on me, nor did it look like you were examining anything except my case on you, which you said you found suspicious in 1270. Then all the sudden I look town for it in 1348. I'm finding it hard to believe you ever legitimately thought that given your other behavior before and after that post. It does serve as a vehicle to buddy thor, though.
Your #1411 is pretty much all IIoA -- all you do is list things I did. I acknowledge I did those things. You offer no explanation of the scum motivation that you apparently found in those actions.
Mantis wrote:
also, I do want to give her the benefit of the doubt, and allow her to work on scum hunting after a few flips. (like she said)
I know you're parroting someone else here, I just can't remember who also said we should not lynch Mala for this reason. I think it was Mollie.
Mantis wrote:I don't plan on changing my mind from these past few posts.
When does town "plan" on changing his or her mind? It should just either happen or not happen, and this reads like a disclaimer that you're locking your vote in and don't plan to change it regardless of what happens.
Mantis wrote: only recently because the compromise to the compromise. And that's thanks to bork-scum.
Seriously? that's 1) a pretty sudden emphatic endorsement that you think I'm scum with the "bork-scum" thing, which doesn't fit the rest of your "I think he's the best guy to go" stuff you're doing in 1411 and 2) A blatant misrep considering that I've been LEADING your wagon the entire time.