In plain view of a page that I already openly admitted I didn't read.
So...good job proving I'm being honest?
As to my answer; To shake things up and because I had a townish flush on him at the time.
I...sorta said as much when i unvoted him.
At least I'm honest about what I do and don't read and do or don't understand, yay me!
In post 1345, Adam-12 wrote:And we should trust all this because you read what people posted? That's why you missed that double quote; it was posted by two people and was in plain sight all by itself with your name all bolded and everything but you obviously read what people posted and thus have reliable reads.
Yes.
I don't see what the issue is here - players who had not been posting much whilst I was active earlier came in and posted quite a bit, even on the three or so pages I read I got to see basically double to treble the amount of posts from certain players. That allowed me to get better reads on them.
In post 1353, Adam-12 wrote:But I don't like how Thor "agreed" with me and just slid off his bad Hawk assault onto a populist lynch wagon. I think we are being played.
Thor's case is hyper bad and though I didn't explain why I did present reasoning to think that ProHawk was town that I thought was good reasoning.
Then Thor, THAT BASTARD! Actually...y'know...read it...and AGREED!!!
Obv. scum is OBV!
Amirite
In post 1360, leviathan93 wrote:how the hell am i acting scummy? =P (just to make sure everyone is aware of what i'm saying and doing)
The way you pushed on Shrimp and then withdrew despite, actually, less reasoning as to why Shrimp looked town being presented after your vote than before it.
