Uraj wrote:
Stating a suspcion and not putting your vote there is not inherently scummy. Ibby's persistence on that particular point is getting tiresome.
About as tiresome as MBL asking me the same question repeatedly for which there is no answer that will satisfy him? I can only think of two reasons for this. 1) He is scum attempting to make a false accusation fit. 2) He is town who has become so attached to his theory that even though he is asking the question, he is unwilling to consider the merit of the answer.
#1 seems more viable to me, obviously. However, I will consider #2.
If it is #2 then he is expecting me to have behaved in the manner he would've without actually having been in my position at the start of day 3. Note: I was focused more on things that I knew directly involved me such as the discrepancy with spamwise/mathcam and also the mechanics of the game where I took into account the knowledge of my office - Still willing to explain if anyone is interested. Since MBL isn't in my office, if he's town, he's stubbornly refusing to contemplate my position at the time where he expected different behavior from me.
Taking that into consideration, it is possible that I am guilty of similar stubborness in regards to MBL. I am a firm believer of putting your vote where your mouth is. I find it scummy when people don't. Always have - always will. MBL has expressed being more suspicious of others, but his primary attacks have been on me. Therefore, I have disbelieved his stated 'more suspicious of others' stance because he's not behaving in a manner I would myself.
I have been contemplating the possibility that myself and MBL are two townies arguing over differences of how we would each handle things and finding each other scummy for not doing what we would do ourselves. If this is true, continuing to fight over it will not do the town any good. I'm not ready to entirely accept this idea but it is something that is on my mind. In light of it, I am willing to back down from arguing with MBL further at this point. (agree to disagree as he put it)
Uraj wrote:I, for instance, happen to be quite suspicious of you, spectrum (I'm very suspicious of a lot of people for that matter), but I'm not voting for you at this time.
There's a very good case for spectrum being town. The fact that you don't recognize it is suspect.