In post 1157, Thor665 wrote: In post 1150, Adam-12 wrote:Ya it was kind of, she was trying to say that she intentionally garnered negative attention from the beginning of the thread like Bork and that Hawk was spinning because of the hypocrisy -- a terrible terrible push.
Yet not inherently a scummy one - as discussed.
Bad play does not equate to scum play. The question is whether she believed there had been a legit twist of her actions by ProHawk - I would submit that it is easy to see that she did. I have also found (and shown) ProHawk to be twisty and dancy as well. You seem to forgive him instantly though - why the different takes there?
I think it was scum flail. She was saying, "Look at me I deliberately played bad just like Bork and you Hawk are scummy because you gave him a town pass". Why is her logic so bad here because its clear what Bork did and what she supposedly did are completely different. No, I don't think she believed it, I think she wanted everyone else to though and she used it as a reason to try and paint Hawk in a scummy way. If her logic was internally consistent she wouldn't be pushing crap cases in an attempt to ease suspicion.
I tire of defending Hawk but I think he explained himself in his recovery post and to me it reads as genuine because I was feeling the exact same frustration over the situation.
I deliberately held back initially so I could examine his defense because as Mantis said, it did raise a red flag how he called for the hammer. I believe he was truly frustrated as town over Mollie's horrendous play (I have things I still want to say about it after this game) and because of his pro-town play all game long, I maintain that read.