In post 3182, AngryPidgeon wrote:...??? I suggested the messenger target Acosmist immediately after you claimed no more shots. And then you retorted back with "Oh well testing Acosmist isnt really worth it anyways"
Well
that
certainly absolves you of any and all suspicion.
Your dance is funny. You think ACO is likely town meaning you believe his claim but you want to go ahead and “test” a claim you already believe. Lol
I’m to dull to catch crumbs (Why are you looking for crumbs?) but if mky is the messenger and Matsin doesn’t mind sending a town read to his (potential) death then that seems kinda scummy.
In post 3188, Cheery Dog wrote:
Would it trouble you (or even Nero for that matter since he started it) to give an explanation for why?
snifit + you having no reads
Don't really have any though I did want to target town and create a psedo-masonship.
+This looks a lot like the crap coming from MOI.
Why did you decide today that Acosmist's kill flavor needed to be known and tested?
I didn't. I'm not sure who brought up the "lets test ACO's claim!!!" but I think if so many players are onboard with this plan then Aco should out his kill flavor that way if he
IS
targeted and his claimed kill flavor doesn't show up then he's lying.
In post 3190, Kublai Khan wrote:This was a poor answer. Let's say that the Mafia Roleblocker did not die on Day 1. Why would town have an ability to neighborize that is instantaneous and therefore Mafia cannot block it?
Are you scum? This is the dumbest question
EVER
!!!! If the roleblocker was still alive would my role still be instant? I don't know, don't care. These what if questions are downright stupid.
In post 3191, AngryPidgeon wrote:The way Nero is accusing me of defending the messenger when I absolutely never did other than to say that setup spec makes me think messenger/Nero aren't a team is lol (if Nero is town then why does he care?). And he falsely said that I backed my plan down about targeting Acosmist when he said he was out of shots. I never did, I recommended the messenger do it. Nero did call the plan useless at that point though.
As I mentioned above: this dance is funky.
AP: I doubt that Nero/messenger is a scum/scum grouping but it could be scum/town or it could be town/town. Look at me fence sit!!!
AP: I think ACO is town but I have no issue with sending someone to their death!!!
AP: If the messenger flips town we should lynch Nero.
Note: But didn't want then messenger lynched when I flipped town. Also didn't explain why the messenger shouldn't have been sent (but that was before he learned I was out of shots)
In post 3194, AngryPidgeon wrote:There are two entities. Both benefit from having Tammy gone, but each loses something by making the kill. Would scum have killed her? Probably not.
I disagree. Scum fear death. Scum couldn't have blocked her and she repersents a second lynch durring the day. Scum beneifitted more by lynching Tammy then town did. Scum
NEEDED
her gone. I wouldn't be to terribly supprised to find 2 or even 3 scum on her wagon.
In post 3196, AngryPidgeon wrote:And if Nero is somewhat likely to get lynched down the line anyways, so if he is town it prevents that as well. And if nero or Acosmist is scum, then doing this makes even more sense.
.....................
my death still lessens the number of town so yes....its basicly scum getting an extra kill. But I've never understood
WHY
its important to send me as opposed to other PR's which might get lynched.
no. stop shadowing MOI.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
