Mini 1397: War is Hell (Game Over)

Kinetic · Post Post #900 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:51 pm

In post 899, MattP wrote:The one where they posted giant consecutive walls? I skipped over it mostly but I can look over it

You want to, basically he derailed me when I found a REALLY good reason to pressure Xalxe (one he even agreed with at one point), admitted to an anti-town agenda, and generally has been being a twat. Any scum team I'm pretty sure includes him.

MattP · Post Post #901 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:05 pm

All right, I'll try to read it tonight I'm traveling (once again)

quadz08 · Post Post #902 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:10 pm

Hi uhhhh

blatant prod-dodge

I should be able to read/post tomorrow at work

Tierce · Post Post #903 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:58 pm

In post 893, Zdenek wrote:Tierce, do you have a read on Kinetic yet?

The thing I

least

want to do in this game is enter a conversation of any kind with you, because it will degenerate in helpless headdesking from my end. Can't be bothered. I think you and Kinetic are both Town, and that's the end of interaction that I want to have directly with you. It's nothing about you as a person, but I know that paying heed to your playstyle will drive me completely batshit and my patience for it has already run out.

MattP · Post Post #904 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:20 pm

^Things like this rekindle my townread for Tierce

Thank you, needed that

Yosarian2 · Post Post #905 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:38 pm

In post 802, Zdenek wrote:1000 points to anyone who can find where I said anything about having a problem with the amount Yos is posting.

Right now, I am voting Yos, who's response to my vote was to lie about the reason that I am voting him.

Well, let's see what was the reason you gave for voting me. Oh, right.

In post 765, Zdenek wrote:
This seems like more fun.

Vote: Yosarian

Scooby voted me for lurking. You followed him and joined the bandwagon because "it seemed like fun" and did not give ANY other reason at all at the time of your vote. The logical assumption was that you agreed with his reason. (Yes, you had mentioned like a week before that you didn't like my "pattern of voting", because I was using "boilerplate scum tells" or whatever, but that was a BS attack that didn't actually mean anything and you had never followed up on it.)

But, sure, you didn't explicitly say you were voting me for lurking. Actually, I'm thinking that you're voting me because you're scum and don't really have any real reasons at all.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #906 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:42 pm

In post 806, scooby wrote:
In post 797, Yosarian2 wrote:ABR is town, quadz is town, LLD is town. Kinetic is likely town, Tierce is likely town based on day 1 posting.

I'm thinking the scum group includes both Zdenek and scooby. I still don't know how to read MattP, maybe we'll get a better idea after his exams are done.

Confirm VOTE YOSARIAN2

There is no way you think Im scum when Im TOWNIER THAN FUCKING TOWN

Shit defense is shit.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #907 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:45 pm

In post 820, scooby wrote:
In post 817, MattP wrote:In fact it would have made NO sense for you to call me out on that the way you did unless you thought it was a scumslip or you were trying to incriminate me, so I want to you explicitly state why it was a scumslip.

SCUM

UNVOTE VOTE MATTP

MattP is looking townier, and Scooby is looking more and more like scum. This post on Scooby's part is 100% bullshit.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #908 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:15 am

Matt is STILL doing this flip flopping around BS where he tries to find a line of suspicion that will stick.

He's STILL scum, and the interaction with ABR was bad because he basically said that ABR was scum for a multitude of reasons, ABR called him out on something in his post, and Matt tries to get him to answer BS questions about what he pointed out instead of answering ABR's PERTINENT question of "Where are your points why I am scum?"

MattP got called out for not having any real points to pin ABR with and tried to flail his way out of it, and that was the last straw for me. (Zdenek there's your answer).

Voidedmafia · Post Post #909 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:43 am

Spoiler: Hey, LLD, does this looks good from ABR?

Yeah, maybe Matt needs to work on a case. However, you're conveniently ignoring how ABR completely sidesteps Matt's question to 812 and instead asks about a case when that point isn't even related to what Matt brought up. Do kindly explain how this is less important than "OH NOES MATT HAZ NO CASE!"

Voidedmafia · Post Post #910 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:45 am

Cuz I'm dumb and forget quotes wrote:

Spoiler: Hey, LLO, does this look good for ABR?
In post 812, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 810, MattP wrote:1) Kinetic, Yos, and Zdenek are town. I greatly foresee town pushing through me, Zdenek and Yos as the next three mislynches. I will defend them vehemently. I will be coming up with my Zdenek is town case first to get back to whoever asked me about that

Town will push for mislynches? I'm confused. Don't you mean scum, Matt?

In post 813, MattP wrote:
In post 812, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 810, MattP wrote:1) Kinetic, Yos, and Zdenek are town. I greatly foresee town pushing through me, Zdenek and Yos as the next three mislynches. I will defend them vehemently. I will be coming up with my Zdenek is town case first to get back to whoever asked me about that

Town will push for mislynches? I'm confused. Don't you mean scum, Matt?

Hey ABR suppose I really meant town. Explain how that's a scumslip

In post 814, Albert B. Rampage wrote:How about that case you promised?

In post 815, MattP wrote:
In post 814, Albert B. Rampage wrote:How about that case you promised?
How about you answer my question?

Yeah, maybe Matt needs to work on a case. However, you're conveniently ignoring how ABR completely sidesteps Matt's question to 812 and instead asks about a case when that point isn't even related to what Matt brought up. Do kindly explain how this is less important than "OH NOES MATT HAZ NO CASE!"

<_<

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #911 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:47 am

In post 909, Voidedmafia wrote:
Spoiler: Hey, LLD, does this looks good from ABR?
In post 812, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 810, MattP wrote:1) Kinetic, Yos, and Zdenek are town. I greatly foresee town pushing through me, Zdenek and Yos as the next three mislynches. I will defend them vehemently. I will be coming up with my Zdenek is town case first to get back to whoever asked me about that

Town will push for mislynches? I'm confused. Don't you mean scum, Matt?

In post 813, MattP wrote:
In post 812, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 810, MattP wrote:1) Kinetic, Yos, and Zdenek are town. I greatly foresee town pushing through me, Zdenek and Yos as the next three mislynches. I will defend them vehemently. I will be coming up with my Zdenek is town case first to get back to whoever asked me about that

Town will push for mislynches? I'm confused. Don't you mean scum, Matt?

Hey ABR suppose I really meant town. Explain how that's a scumslip

Yeah, maybe Matt needs to work on a case. However, you're conveniently ignoring how ABR completely sidesteps Matt's question to 812 and instead asks about a case when that point isn't even related to what Matt brought up. Do kindly explain how this is less important than "OH NOES MATT HAZ NO CASE!"

Did I not just reference that ABR pointed out this? I don't see anything wrong with this series of posts. I have an opinion as to why ABR said what he said (mostly that it was to draw Matt out so he can force his case out of him, which is congruent with the REST of the interaction), and Matt has yet to show us SHIT of what he said existed. So far he's only been pushing ABR on things he has said AFTER his original calling him scum.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #912 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:03 am

So you don't find ABR sidestepping Matt's question about his comment on that post to be scummy at all? Also, I do think there's a good amount of implied scumminess ABR is trying to put on Matt with 812.

Also, it's kinda stupid to ask for a case when Matt already said he would get to it, so.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #913 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:51 am

In post 912, Voidedmafia wrote:So you don't find ABR sidestepping Matt's question about his comment on that post to be scummy at all? Also, I do think there's a good amount of implied scumminess ABR is trying to put on Matt with 812.

Also, it's kinda stupid to ask for a case when Matt already said he would get to it, so.

I think you're missing the point that pressuring for a case is important and townie to do.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #914 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:09 am

...Not when A.) It sidesteps a good question to ask, and B.) said pressure is irrelevant given certain words the pressured (Matt) said.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #915 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:14 am

In post 914, Voidedmafia wrote:...Not when A.) It sidesteps a good question to ask, and B.) said pressure is irrelevant given certain words the pressured (Matt) said.

Except A) It's not a good question and B) The pressure isn't irrelevent because Matt has a HISTORY OF NOT ANSWERING QUESTIONS/FOLLOWING UP ON HIS "SUSPICIONS".

So yeah, no. What you're saying doesn't hold water.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #916 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:18 am

A.) It is a good question. Granted, asking if ABR's calling it a scumslip is a bit much, but questioning why ABR made that statement is good.
B.) ...Okay. Well, considering that Matt actually delivered (and seemingly not because of ABR's "pressure"), what does that change?

Yosarian2 · Post Post #917 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:03 am

In post 810, MattP wrote:1) Kinetic, Yos, and Zdenek are town. I greatly foresee town pushing through me, Zdenek and Yos as the next three mislynches. I will defend them vehemently. I will be coming up with my Zdenek is town case first to get back to whoever asked me about that

For the record, after this post, I am about 85% sure that MattP is town.

Look at the wagons. If I was going to guess the 4 most likely people to be lynched today, it'd be Zdenk, MattP, me, and then maybe Kinetic. If MattP was scum, no way in hell would he defend *all* of the likely easy lynches today, especally not when he's one of the ones on the list. He's not playing tactically, the way I would expect a scum to.

Scooby attacking Matt after this post (especially on the improbable theory that him saying "town" here is somehow a scum slip) just makes Scooby look even worse to me here.

Zdenek · Post Post #918 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:05 pm

Vote: Scooby

scooby · Post Post #919 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:09 pm

Im sick.
VLA until Friday at least.

scooby · Post Post #920 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:13 pm

Looks we have retarded town all over again.
Mattp and Yosa are scum. Please remember that.
Nrever lynch kanye, kinetic, tierce or abr. zdenek is prob third party now that I think about it. okay.
peace.

scooby · Post Post #921 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:14 pm

oh quadz is town as well. lamdadelta slight town, coyuld be preemptevily bussing matt, but fuck this, ok

MattP · Post Post #922 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:16 pm

That was actually fcking terrible what you just posted

Poster fixed.

scooby · Post Post #923 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:18 pm

no it was not

who the fuck are you

MattP · Post Post #924 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:19 pm

In post 922, MattP wrote:That was actually fcking terrible what you just posted

This was me

Also, this:

In post 2821, MattP wrote:
In post 2807, Phillammon wrote:It's been fun, gentlemen. Kill SPB for me if it's not over when the list is depleted.

[12/5/12 4:11:32 PM] mattypjhu: Phil is the last scum and the game is going to end by tomorrow
[12/5/12 4:11:34 PM] mattypjhu: And I say this because
[12/5/12 4:11:53 PM] mattypjhu: A last scum that knows it's over always says something cartoonishly heroic
[12/5/12 4:12:07 PM] mattypjhu: "GL guys after I die make sure you get that SPB *shakes fist*"

I mean, it was completely over for you by that point so it doesn't really matter but it's possible we in the neighborhood could have switched to PV (some people expressed desire to vig him). Also KKB and I had the NK, not Tammy but it was a cover for when we bought it.

I still want an ABR lynch first and foremost