Why do we have the following votes languishing around on non-viable wagons or not even voting?
Acosmist - 2 (Yates, Kublai Khan)
zabriel - 1 (jasonT1981)
WrathChild - 1 (PeregrineV)
Yates - 1 (Acosmist)
mykonian - 1 (AngryPidgeon)
Not voting - WrathChild, pidgey
I’ve edited out my scum-reads (Elo / Zabriel) from these groups.
--
Zabriel is lurking scum.
--
Nero wrote: You do know that the scum blocker is dead and there's not a guarantee of a town one right? But you are also experienced enough to know that outguessing the mod is stupid. So why are you doing it? All I know is that I sent in he action and the mod made us a qt within the next 20 mins.
I do know that fact. Do you know that regardless of that the Mod not waiting til the end of the Night to establish the QT communicates to you and the person you Neighborize that there are NO remaining blocking roles? Do you understand that this makes me suspect that your answer?
Here’s my question to clarify – does your Role PM specify your action is “instant”?
Nero wrote: Uno
Why didn’t you recruit last Night then?
Nero wrote: LYNCH ALL LIARS!!!
So you pointed out my mistake … yet here’s your original Scum list I linked to.
ooba
fox
WC
SK
Elmo
SD
Slandaar
You are absolutely correct. Ooba wasn’t your partner on this list.
Nero wrote: You should read better as this has already been addressed. I was willing to buy Ben's guilty on Tammy. He was either a cop or a mafia rolecop. Its pretty simple logic.
No, it isn’t “just simple logic”. You strongly felt Benmage could be a Mafia Rolecop but didn’t push Tammy to shoot him? Because Serial Killer Tammy shooting Scum Benmage would have been a Win Win for Town had your ‘suspicions’ been right and you were Town. If you answer was "I wasn't sure" ... whelp ...
Nero wrote: What MOI is accusing me of is that I’m lying about it being “instant” and therefore I did not talk to Tammy last night
Nope. That’s not even close to what my issue is. Thanks for just manufacturing bullshit though.
My issue is that it makes zero sense for a TOWN Neighborizor to have an instant action in a set-up with at least one blocking role.
Now if in the end this is bad Modding so be it. I choose to assume it is not for the moment.
--
mykonian wrote: it has nothing to do with understanding that it's a scumtell. I know it's a scumtell because it works. And I'm far from an exception to that.
If you weren’t scum you would of course not be arguing that you understand buddying works and still be giving Elo a Town read because he’s buddying you.
But you aren’t … so …
Also – I do greatly appreciate your ”Lining up lynches on MoI under Burden of Proficiency grounds is stupid” post where you basically acknowledge you know I’m not scum. A++, everyone should read.
mykonian wrote: "I do it every game.". The only reason would tell us is because you are purposefully sticking to your meta. Guess who like to do that.
I AGREE 100%. People who say things like “I always am suspected as Town, it’s my meta” are scum.
Please self-vote in shame.
--
Els wrote: Null. Not that you care much about my answer given the rest of your post though.
This is a lovely non-answer when pressed on the issue. Els-scum later goes on to say that Mykonian has done nothing to make him feel he is Town or Scum.
But Els doesn’t do that. Because he is scum.
Els wrote: I was interested in seeing MoI vs Mastin because one of them (mastin at the time) was one of my scumread (based on style). I believed i could get interesting data from that, that could make mastin a better lynch than my suspects at that time. I must admit I didn't expect MoI style to be that ... absurdly verbose.
Now, aren't you concernced that MoI, despite writing walls over wall on me, never asked this question?It seemed much more important (and easier to answer) than "go read my case on mykonian and tell me what you think about it".
This is from Post 2617. Let’s address the scummy elements of it.
The first is that his scum-read on mastin was ‘based on style” which is by far the worst excuse in history for having a read.
The second is that he tries to handwave that there would be “interesting data” from the 1v1. Yet he isn’t willing to actually articulate what meaningful data it would be.
The third is really the kicker. Read the bolded. He’s saying “Why didn’t MoI ask me about continuing the 1v1” as if to say I’m scum not actually scum-hunting.
I present to you EXHIBIT G in the ‘Els is scum’ case –
MoI in 2417 wrote: Why is a 1v1 a good point Elo?
MoI in 2420 wrote: Why is the 1v1 a good thing? Please elaborate on your position and reasoning.
So not only did I TWICE ask Els about it now he’s trying to re-write history to say I never did.
Not to mention that this directly conflicts with what Els said here –
I don't speak about the fact that a 1v1 is good or bad.Of course it's dumb.
So back at 2419 Els directly acknowledges that a 1v1 is as dumb thing. But now he’s trying to say he could get valuable data from it. This is classic "Scum giving the answer that makes them look best not the truth and getting caught contradicting themselves".
--
pidgey wrote: Also to MoI, my only scum games are Chrono trigger and Kingdom hearts.
Ok, thanks pidgey!