In post 2497, Vifam wrote:Also you're just really condescending, I liked it better when you weren't trying to shoot questions at me every time you post.
It's because I think you're scum
In post 2497, Vifam wrote:Also you're just really condescending, I liked it better when you weren't trying to shoot questions at me every time you post.
Noir needs to die here for some unexplained reason.In post 1030, Maenara wrote:Are Paschendale and Alsark on the same team?
Also, thank y'all so much for the spam. Was quite a lovely thing to read.
Where did Noir go? He needs to die too.
VOTE: DeasVail - Because we all know that joining the same wagon as two people you've just accused of being scum is a brilliant idea.
Seriously, though.
and this unexplained reason was apparently a warning about Noir.In post 1168, Maenara wrote:I warned you about the Noir, people. I warned you.
xtoph, your post was bad. Like, looking-for-arbitrary-scumslips-in-things-that-obviously-contain-none-of-such bad. That's real bad.
In other news, Deas still feels like he's trying to force a townread on himself by staging a humerously stupid (fake) townfight.
I'd say something about it being hilariously easy for scum to lurk, as per usual in large themes, but that might not go well with me having two posts on fortyseven pages. Oh, woops, dearie me, I guess I said it anyway. So, yeah, let's have all us inactives vote for the prominent stupid people, as opposed to the silent stupid people.
But not Taz. Because really, let's give him a chance to get lynched due to his own messes as opposed to those of Pasch.
For now, let's kill Plastic-DeasVail.
In post 1308, Maenara wrote:UNVOTE: DeasVail
Was mostly bullshit reasoning anyhow. I just needed a convenient scapegoat on whom to focus my attention while I tried to get in after skipping most of what was before I replaced in.
Now then. Satisfied with DV; enough are vouching for his meta ATM that I'd be willing to let him live even if I had a decent scumread on him, which I don't. Wanted a link between Alsark and Pasch, but with both replacing out, I'm finding that hypothetical too pathetic for me to want it to be true. Got lots of townreads, but those are mainly the obvious ones. Don't like Phil, but think it might just be his usual style seeming forced to me - Can anyone vouch for him not deviating notably from the usual?
I do want Pasch/Taz to be scum, in spite of the guarantee from Nacho, who I got as strong town after his vigorous defense of DV earlier, and I'd be willing to default on a Taz lynch as matters are. Still, want to look at other options too. Noir needs to be vigged or otherwise killed, Vifam is not on my town-list due to his not provoking enough controversy, Buldermar is too controversial to not be a town-read at the moment, and what the seven hells is ActionDan doing? Like, literally. I'd like a description thereof.
VOTE: ActionDan
In post 1456, Maenara wrote:Realized I was deliberately trying to look town yesterday, which was stupid as hell. Will try to be less useless.
Alsark was acting real weird before he replaced out, and Pasch's actions could quite easily be construed as a bad attempt to distance. Alsark was also on DV's wagon, which is another point not in his favour (And yes, so was I, but I had to check.) Zdenek has said nothing, so there's nothing further to work with yet. I don't see him on the same team as Pandorica, though, seeing as they both made bullshit claims at about the same time, which would be a bit odd for scum.
xtopherusD has an incredible busywork-to-stancetaking ratio, and not in a good way. I'm particularly drawn to the post Epic pointed out, wherein he wanted the day to end with about two weeks to deadline.
Yeah, I can get behind pressuring him.
VOTE: xtopherusD
Also, hello to you too, S&R. My defense: Yes, I was useless.
In post 1534, Maenara wrote:Minor point, but the Noir comment was supposed to be a SBaHJ reference.
As for the rest, meh. Will care about what isn't about me tomorrow.
In post 1702, Maenara wrote:Meeh, xtoph seems okay now, I guess. Reaction hasn't been bad, and mostly in line with his prior style, so is all good.
For now, I'm willing to go for someone who has absolutely failed to play as well as he can, and has instead gone for stating the obvious and voting for either the most popular wagons, or wagons that don't make sense at all. Yes, there's a chance that he might be doing this as town, but if that's the case, it's about time he shows us that.
VOTE: AurorusVox
In post 1968, Maenara wrote:Readjusting previous statement. Have read, will comment thoughtfully when thinkpan functioning properly once more.
Will comment non-thoughtfully now.
Yes, Malpa is likely to be scum. No, I won't vote for him right now, because I'm tired as hell and I'll probably accidentally hammer him or something. Call me in the morning. I don't get why AV is being ignored. He's scummier than GNR, damnit, and he's just... Bleh. Ne'er mind; I suspect that 'less he says something, he'll get what he deserves eventually. Some of the more active people seem town, some seem more doubtful. Not going to spend time trying to lynch those today. We can use them to find their rivals, first. Hooray for multiball. Let's spend today focusing down those who are both useless and scummy. Like, I guess, Malp.
Yep. Iiii'll just say something more tomorrow something.
In post 2470, Maenara wrote:Well. Things have happened, evidently.
I read them, too. I'm so proud of myself.
I'm not entirely satisfied with some of the reasons for joining the AV wagon, but I am entirely satisfied with it being as popular as it suddenly is. I am no longer as convinced by his scumminess as I was, but my conviction is still strong enough, especially combined with the plethora of info from his flip, that I still advocate his death.
Also, AD, get over yourself, or explain why I need to die.
Still says Noir should be killed, yet hasn't given a reason for it yet, nor a vote in his direction. Calls Pasch/Taz scum and then goes and votes in a direction that hadn't seen any votes there yet. With Noir being a scumread that lasted past the bullshit reasoning, wouldn't he be the better person to start a new wagon on?
In post 2485, malpascp wrote:People saying that claiming JK is scummy should just vote themselves and shut up for the rest of the game.
I just skimmed the last 10 pages, and still don't know if Mehdi is shooting me tonight.
I'm wondering why didn't anyone made some detailed ISOs on Cheery and AV, but I'll do it myself tomorrow.
In post 2468, ActionDan wrote:DeasV while you're around could you care to tell everyone what you're thinking in your foxbrain
In post 2451, BT wrote:
In post 2450, buldermar wrote:
Pick a wagon. I don't remember anything from you that isn't Cheery-related.
In post 2493, Titan wrote:You have literally been pushing like any wagon that gains some wheels?In post 2491, Vifam wrote:I'm literally trying to strongarm some lynches here I think I deserve the right to post some fluff when I feel like it, god damm it
Except Cheery.
In post 2470, Maenara wrote:I'm not entirely satisfied with some of the reasons for joining the AV wagon, but I am entirely satisfied with it being as popular as it suddenly is. I am no longer as convinced by his scumminess as I was, but my conviction is still strong enough, especially combined with the plethora of info from his flip, that I still advocate his death.
In post 2475, Maenara wrote:That said, you are ignoring Medhi. Is he not one of the more suspicious people on this wagon?
In post 2481, Mehdi2277 wrote:I can shoot you [Maenara].
In post 2503, ActionDan wrote:you [Titan], Mehdi, and Vifam are next tier which is pretty high, so it'd be fun not to spam.
In post 2503, ActionDan wrote:Cheery Dog post^ there reads like a laundry list but this part wasn't too bad:
Still says Noir should be killed, yet hasn't given a reason for it yet, nor a vote in his direction. Calls Pasch/Taz scum and then goes and votes in a direction that hadn't seen any votes there yet. With Noir being a scumread that lasted past the bullshit reasoning, wouldn't he be the better person to start a new wagon on?
In post 2503, ActionDan wrote:Maenara, thoughts on the wagons that aren't AV's.
In post 2510, BT wrote:Buldermar can you please cooperate when people ask you questions?
In post 2513, buldermar wrote:In post 2510, BT wrote:Buldermar can you please cooperate when people ask you questions?Yes, possibly. What questions?
In post 2460, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 2445, Sanjay wrote:I'd like to wait for malp to get back more actively. I feel like his curmugeonly attitude he's recently affected seems pretty non-specific for scumminess. It seems like a pretty natural development of him not having enough time. The whole "How are you posting if you are V/LA" stuff is bogus and super non-specific.
Let him come back and say some shit.
DO NOT make excuses for - I'd say lurkerscum, but malcasp is much worse than that.
Read Ladies' Night mafia; check how many excuses for not participating the scum brought up everyday. In fact I pushed a Day-1 scumlynch the second one of the scums said they couldn't participate fully because of some lame reason about their "computer nook," then she melted down under pressure. Another scum used RL excuses (a murdered relative, of all things, but that's Amrun, she exploits sad, sob RL excuses every time she's scum) to shirk responsibilities. Neither scum asked for replacement, mind you. Just excuses to beat the town to the punch when the town inevitably notice their suckage and lack of participation.
And are you playing some sort of game where you go against everyone's opinion for scum reasons, or are you just that bad at the game?
In post 2515, BT wrote:In post 2513, buldermar wrote:In post 2510, BT wrote:Buldermar can you please cooperate when people ask you questions?Yes, possibly. What questions?
I've mentioned that I don't recall your take on the other wagons. (Malp, AVox, Maenara) Can you state them clearly?
In post 2485, malpascp wrote:People saying that claiming JK is scummy should just vote themselves and shut up for the rest of the game.
I just skimmed the last 10 pages, and still don't know if Mehdi is shooting me tonight.
I'm wondering why didn't anyone made some detailed ISOs on Cheery and AV, but I'll do it myself tomorrow.
In post 2505, BroodKingEXE wrote:In post 2485, malpascp wrote:People saying that claiming JK is scummy should just vote themselves and shut up for the rest of the game.
I just skimmed the last 10 pages, and still don't know if Mehdi is shooting me tonight.
I'm wondering why didn't anyone made some detailed ISOs on Cheery and AV, but I'll do it myself tomorrow.
Your V/LA is over. How can you not see what Medhi was trying to plan? Guys, we need to lynch this guy for not even considering this plan. I'm not even going to consider lynching Avox until I know this scum is going to die.
In post 2498, Titan wrote:In post 2496, Vifam wrote:I'm trying my best to get Avox lynched and you're voting him, I don't see why we have to argue with each other.
It really doesn't seem that way though.
It seems more like you're giving a soft push here or there to a leading wagon to show that you're putting some effort in.