EmpTyger wrote:You were bluffing because there would be no consequence in any way if I didn’t answer before nightfall. But now, in case the town has not yet figured it out:
I wasn't bluffing. And to say that there would be "no consequence" if you didn't answer is unbelievably obtuse. There's more game -- there'd certainly be consequence for me
tomorrow
if you truly thought I was bluffing. The fact that you think you'll either be cleared or killed (now I'm thinking doubtful) tonight shows that you thought you could hold off until then to accuse me. I don't think anyone should consider you cleared tomorrow if you simply live. There's absolutely no guarantee of a vigilante in every mini game.
EmpTyger wrote:Total and utter misquote. I did *not* say “determining the other mafia”. What I said (in [415]) was “determining other mafia”. And I have better things to do than direct the cop for you.
You're absolutely right. Misread on my part and, for that, I apologize. Please admit, though, that seeing it as I did (that you said "
the
other") -- my questions were valid.
Would you agree that, if I were not scum with Chess, there was no reason for me to save him? Would you further agree, then, that Chess makes more sense to vig than AniX tonight to "verify" alignment and the cop can check AniX?
EmpTyger -- I'm really distrustful of you right now, as it should be apparent. I don't like when someone attempts to railroad me or says I'm trying to "bluff" without explaining why. Your point about me misquoting you is certainly fair -- but your implication that it was nefarious in intent is not.
EmpTyger wrote:-I’m going to vigkill because there are enough good targets. The same reason why I must lynch. You wouldn’t advocate a nolynch in this situation. The same logic holds for consensual vigkilling.
This is idiotic. If there were
one
good target, this would make sense -- but with so many, it's as good as a shot in the dark. If Sentinel's town, you could bring us to lynch or lose unnecessarily (if you're truly a vig and mafia is successful tonight, we'll be down to seven tomorrow, three of whom could be scum) -- because you seem unable to see/consider this, I'm starting to think you're not too worried about the town.
EmpTyger wrote:And I have better things to do than direct the cop for you.
Really?
EmpTyger wrote:I feel knowing Chess’s alignment would be more useful in determining other mafia, however, but since a cop is still likely outstanding, there’s no reason for me to resort to such a drastic measure to test alignment.
Did you not direct the cop to investigate Chess here? 'Cause that's certainly what it looks like.
EmpTyger wrote:-I’m not the cop. You know I’m not the cop. But as for likely investigations:
Town: if MeMe’s not dead tomorrow, ask yourselves why not.
(ie: Cop: do not waste your investigation on her; if she lives, she is the godfather.)
You know, the town is not so stupid not to take into consideration the fact that if I'm not dead tomorrow, it's possible it's because no one tried to kill me.
Here's my claim, though: either I'm dead tonight and it doesn't matter or I'm alive and EmpTyger's scum. If, by some chance, I'm alive -- I don't want anyone pretending I took the time to create a claim overnight. I'm Mrs. Rose Darko, vanilla townie (oh! see why Chess's claim is extra believable to me?).
Remember...It's not a lie if you believe it. -- G. Costanza