In post 2454, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Did you read Post 2238 Peregrine? How exactly does that string of reasoning come across as Town? Please explain in detail how that looks Town to you.
Point 1 – treatment of the Tammy wagon
Myk votes Tammy
Myk unvotes Tammy
Myk thinks if Tammy=town, she should shoot Ben. You compare to being called out for telling Ben not to gambit.
More talk about number of players.
Summary – Mykonian’s actions (not wanting to lynch Tammy today) don’t back up the posts he made surrounding her wagon (that he wants to end the Day on Evens, that he doesn’t believe she can be leashed). That's Cognitive Dissonance which is a strong scum-tell.
Point 2 – Treating me as Town while calling me scum.
Point 1- That is your first instinct. Cop claims guilty, let's lynch guilty. Tammy proving she has dayvig powers, then as town you definitely want a drink of directing that power. Then the arguement, with Tammy claiming town. Myk is right, if Tammy is town, she shoots the player with guilty claim on her.
She didn't, because she's not town, but is not playing the "against-town" mindset because she didn't kill Ben.
You know the difference between a fakeclaim and a gambit, right?
The number of players talk really means nothing to me. I don't worry about endgame at the beginning of the game, since you deal with endgame however it comes up. Manipulating it, or trying to, just seems dumb. And Ben, the cop, convinced Myk that Tammy couldn't be leashed. Not sure why he's scummy for that.
Point 2-That behavior is somewhat normal for town. Now granted, if it's blatant is can be a scumtell. The example you gave is not an example of scum treating town-you like town while calling you scum or pushing your wagon.