yeaHyToFry wrote:Checking in.
Vote: Fritzlerfor not saying hi to me when he said hy to amb.
but i said hi
and its like hy
Matches Fritzler voting for me every game we play together. Do we have some kind of double-headed 3-way symmetry here?Glork wrote:Coron, the "I'm going to vote for Glork in every game we play together" bit is actually getting a bit old. I suggest you put your vote somewhere useful.Coron wrote:Pretty sure we should get back to lynching glorkos.
So...why are you voting for me?sprontalic wrote: As mini already said he wanted to hang around until the randomness was over. As for me The reason I kept my random vote was because Glork is the only one I'd vote. As for the joke the crap logic wasn't referring to this game...it was referring to the time I was glorked in some other mini which I forget the number of but is too lazy to check for.
As for lurking...this is the first big game I've been in and all this randomness is just too hard to keep up with. I'll try but I honestly don't know what to say or do. So yea I'm as clueless as mini with this.
For now I'm going tounvoteas OMGUS as well as lurker hunting.
vote: Yosarian2
:goodposting:my other head wrote:A pointless OMGUS vote does not make you look pro-town.
This is a huge bleep on my scumdar! It starts out as stupid, moves into craplogic, and has a big finale of overdefensiveness. It's a 3 act scum post.sprontalic wrote: As mini already said he wanted to hang around until the randomness was over. As for me The reason I kept my random vote was because Glork is the only one I'd vote. As for the joke the crap logic wasn't referring to this game...it was referring to the time I was glorked in some other mini which I forget the number of but is too lazy to check for.
As for lurking...this is the first big game I've been in and all this randomness is just too hard to keep up with. I'll try but I honestly don't know what to say or do. So yea I'm as clueless as mini with this.
For now I'm going tounvoteas OMGUS as well as lurker hunting.
vote: Yosarian2
I wanted to attack tsq for such a bold statement this soon, but then I reread MN/spront's posts, and the guy's got a point. Either they've got a case of stage fright or else they're way too defensive for this early stage of the game.Thestatusquo wrote:I honestly have a really scummy feeling about mini neo sprontalic. I'd like to hear more from them.
"OH SHIT, GLORK'S ON TO ME! I'D BETTER SCALE THINGS DOWN JUST A LITTLE BIT!!"MrBuddyLee wrote:I wanted to attack tsq for such a bold statement this soon, but then I reread MN/spront's posts, and the guy's got a point. Either they've got a case of stage fright or else they're way too defensive for this early stage of the game.Thestatusquo wrote:I honestly have a really scummy feeling about mini neo sprontalic. I'd like to hear more from them.
You're sure overdefensive aren't you? My vote on you stays.themanhimself wrote:Sorry for having lurked, but stressful times have overtaken me. I agree with lordy for saying that we need to move beyond the random voting stage. On that note I'm going tounvote. When it is so random there is no way to choose who is really acting scummy. Now that H2 da Tizzle and I are back, and no longer lurking, I say people give good voting reasons, or unvote us. For some random craplogic reason we are the majority vote.
My only defence, is that craplogic is better than no logic.themanhimself wrote:This is a huge bleep on my scumdar! It starts out as stupid, moves into craplogic, and has a big finale of overdefensiveness. It's a 3 act scum post.
vote:sprontalic
My (limited) experience tells me otherwise, but I'm willing to learn.Yosarian2 wrote:There's absoltuly nothing wrong with lurker hunting
K fine, I'll do a reread just for you...though theres really not much I can see as scummy right now. Theres a lot of discussing tactics (like which scum head to lynch etc), joking around and empty threats of "hey lets kill so and so quickly". That's the only explanation I can give as to not trying to hunt scum in the first place.Yosarian2 wrote:If you want to change my opinion of you, then do something, like hunting scum, that makes you look pro-town.
O RLY?sprontalic wrote:My only defence, is that craplogic is better than no logic.themanhimself wrote:This is a huge bleep on my scumdar! It starts out as stupid, moves into craplogic, and has a big finale of overdefensiveness. It's a 3 act scum post.
vote:sprontalic
psstDrippingGoofball wrote:Matches Fritzler voting for me every game we play together. Do we have some kind of double-headed 3-way symmetry here?Glork wrote:Coron, the "I'm going to vote for Glork in every game we play together" bit is actually getting a bit old. I suggest you put your vote somewhere useful.Coron wrote:Pretty sure we should get back to lynching glorkos.
Hmm. Vague claim there. The trouble isn't that crap (or weak) logicsprontalic wrote:My only defence, is that craplogic is better than no logic.
<3petroleumjelly wrote:Oh, for Pete's sake. Half the reason I signed up for this game (even though I feel overloaded on games) is because I know I have a partner who can make up for my lack of posting and vice versa. I'll comment on this game when I find time, but it's fairly low on my priority list game-wise.
That's because you'd have to vote me, and you can't be doing that now.Fritzler wrote:psstDrippingGoofball wrote:Matches Fritzler voting for me every game we play together. Do we have some kind of double-headed 3-way symmetry here?Glork wrote:Coron, the "I'm going to vote for Glork in every game we play together" bit is actually getting a bit old. I suggest you put your vote somewhere useful.Coron wrote:Pretty sure we should get back to lynching glorkos.
im not voting you