In post 759, buldermar wrote:
You seem to be under the impression that I am more accountable for my vote because of already placed votes on Paschendale; this is incorrect.
There was indeed more than one way to try to interpret him asking to be replaced. Whether I jumped to the most damning narrative is a matter of opinion, but I did not try to give my vote substance off of words like "embarrassed", I sincerely think that should he be scum, this is a likely way to interpret it. However, I don't rule out the possibility of him not being scum. In fact, he's statistically more likely to flip town than scum in my opinion, even if he's the most likely person to be scum in the game.
Indeed, I could have been more cautious in my diction. In hindsight, that would probably have prevented your vote on me. I could have phrased the same intended message as "This could be read as: bla bla" I think it's likely enough that reading it this was is correct for me to vote him, bla bla.
Tell me, do you think it could not have been read the way I read it? If so, why not? Do you rule out the possibility of him being embarrassed about giving away his alignment so quickly (given the premise that he's scum, ofc.)? If so, why?
You are not more more accountable than others as far as the value of "1 vote" is concerned but there was momentum gathering on Paschle that looked unstoppable enough that it easily could have led to his lynch, and if he is town then mafia would have secured a mislynch. In this sense your vote was oppurtunistic.
you say, "should he be scum" but you are jumping to that conclusion and then interpreting his statements in that context; you don't have any real backup that led to your opinion of Paschle being scum in the first place.
Your diction was a red flag for oppurtunistic embellishing, not the underlying principle of my vote which is as follows:
You say "This could be read as: bla bla [i.e as scum]" but don't have any reason for supposing it is or not based on anything else.
As to the questions; No, he's not replacing out because he's embarrased he was found out as scum even if he were scum. That would require a level of dignity unfit for a human being that I am not prepared to ascribe to paschle. If he's replacing out, it's because he means what he says, that he has no idea why there's a large wagon on him for reasons he can't fathom, which imo is null (although the way he said it makes me lean town on the slot and makes me adverse to lynching it in general).
Your recent antics over the last few pages is nullish-scummy because the length you went to prolong the "reaction test" allowed you to lap up some limited sympathy even if it gave you a few enemies.
Your supposed 2 town reads you got out of it gives me only slight pause.
FOS: Titan
The angst you displayed in your last few posts is the same quality I saw eariler and it feels just as out of place now as then. It smells scummy
