Mini 373: DOOMsville - Ruined Beyond Repair

Wacky · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:49 pm

Well, it does look like I have to pick a wagon now, doesn't it?

Unvote Romanus, Vote: Boo

The other two wagons just don't look too appealing to me.

HackerHuck · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:39 pm

I don't know jack, so I have no good reason to vote him...

Unvote

Boo bandwagons without proof. Is it really a joke when the vote sticks?

I'm a little concerned that he's become a convenient scapegoat for lynching. The votes are piling up too fast for my taste.

Does anyone have a real reason for voting Bird? He's still got three votes.

HackerHuck · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:00 pm

Well, we called out Boo for voting Bird while "clearly" identifying him to be scum. I just noticed that Wacky did the same for Romanus
(in his first post) last page. Now he's jumping on the Boo bandwagon, which was started because of Boo's "sarcastic" statement.

That's enough for my vote!

Vote: Wacky

for acting rather wacky

Wacky · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:17 pm

Well, no-one was interested in Romanus, and trying to start a fourth bandwagon when there's already 3 already is kinda -_-;

In any case, I am unable to read the following quote out loud without talking with a Fat Tony accent. (+1)

Romanus wrote:Bird is playing it cool, I like that. that last post makes sure everyone knows you're not gonna lurk and also shows you care.

Nice, very nice.

UNVOTE

But someone actually tried to push this wagon. I'd like to see some focus on him.

VOTE: Nightfall

Plus you know, he was third on a bandwagon (+1), and sort of defending someone you voted for on day 1 (+1).

But you know, it's day 1, I dont worry about reasons until day 2.

Nightfall · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:23 am

Unvote

Since the only reasons I had my vote where it was was due to randomness and a misunderstanding.

That being said I don't know if boo is acting any more scummy or if it's more his play style. I'll try and form some sort of structured thought soon.

Sailor Jerry · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:39 am

FOS: Wacky

He has a Fat Tony accent. What more evidence do you need?

Wacky · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:25 pm

Ah, forgettaboutit.

Eon · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:54 am

Would want to see vote count...

Lowell · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:53 am

unvote, vote Wacky

I'm not clear why he "has to choose a wagon." I think all the wagons were started on bogus reasons. To act like we've got our list narrowed down to three is premature.

Romanus · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:37 am

Wacky is looking a little, well, wacky. His reasonings seem to be very non-committal and throws suspicion around without backing it up.

FOS Wacky

would like to see a

VOTECOUNT

Boo · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:48 am

Vote: Wacky

i like huck's logic

slaking_master · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:01 am

yeah, Wacky's actions are a pretty good backing for a day 1 vote,

Vote:Wacky

Nightfall · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:01 am

Vote count please

Machiavellian-Mafia · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:11 am

Time for the 4th Vote Count of DOOM:

4 - Wacky (HackerHuck, Lowell, Boo, slaking_master)
4 - Boo (Jack, Eon, bird1111, Wacky)

2 - Nightfall (Romanus, Mert)
1 - bird1111 (Sailor Jerry)

Not voting: Nightfall

Remember with 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch!

bird1111 · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:36 am

meh, after seeing what Hacker has said about Wacky, he seems like a better lynch than Boo,

Unvote

Vote Wacky

Mert · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:38 am

Boo wrote:
Vote: Wacky

i like huck's logic

Or: "oh yeah, I

knew

I was meant to OMGUS vote Wacky. Thanks for reminding me, Huck!"

FOS: Boo

bird1111 · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:44 am

FOS Mert

What makes you think that?

Mert · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:59 am

bird1111 wrote:
FOS Mert

What makes you think that?

He didn't find Wacky suspicious before and then when someone points out a reason s/he might be he jumps on with nothing more than an "I agree".

He's been wagonhopping a lot with very little explanation. Of the three votes he's made so far, two have been on the person that most recently voted for him and one was an unexplained wagonhop.

bird1111 · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:36 am

Oh, now that you explain it your post makes sense,

UnFOS

Wacky · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:54 am

I see that I have 5 votes. Time to claim:

I am a townie. No special abilities.

Sailor Jerry · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:55 pm

Do we not think that it was a little early to force someone into a claim?

Mert · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:15 pm

Sailor Jerry wrote:Do we not think that it was a little early to force someone into a claim?

Well I didn't think anyone particularly asked for a claim, but I do agree that five votes based on no real evidence was a bit extreme.

Boo · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:43 pm

lynching a vanilla townie is better than doing a random lynch on someone who could be useful to the town. 4 or so scum means 1/3 odds of a random lynch being scum. ~4 pro town roles mean 1/3 of lynching a useful player.

just a suggestion though.

Wacky · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:50 pm

I would FOS Boo for that remark if it wasn't for the fact that I wasn't voting for him already.

You do need to lynch mafia to win you know.

Boo · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:56 pm

wow
apparently logic doesnt work on this forum?
we have just as good a chance of lynching a useful pro town player as we do a scum.

obviously no one is going to claim scum ever, and claiming vanilla townie means he is the town's least useful player.
we have a 2/3 chance of lynching a pro town player, let's try to minimize our losses and lynch a useless one. its day 1 ffs.

have any of you ever considered that wacky is *gasp* LYING about his role?