^--- what does this mean? the FoS?
anyway im
you what? i never said anything even remotely like that....Elias_the_thief wrote:my vote for omg was simply becuase he was urging everyone to kill mert. i thought he was too eager to kill someone. especially when his reasoning was "for having an avatar that frightens me a little"
this is over friendly imo.Random vote: Random Acts - just seems to roll off the tongue...
this drips with mafia imo. someone votes for you and you start of with a laugh, then keep the whole tone of the post positive, finishing with a promise that you are going to do something for the person that voted for you (lowell). no talk of a revenge vote, no attack or analysis whatsoever, avoiding me who was also voting for you. this is just a feel thing, this seems so off, its such a 'i wanna fit in and be nice' post. if this is just how you are then of course i could be wrong.Haha, I've been meaning to change it, actually. It just happened to be the first image I found on my hard drive that was correctly sized. One day I'll get around to Photoshopping something new and exciting, I promise.
scary. i never mentioned anything of that nature. ive given several paragraphs explaining my reasoning. which have been documented again and again in this thread. there have probably been 200+ words already spent on this subject.You never really explained your vote for mert in terms other than "I think mert is scum"
oh ffsAnd yet, your vote of Mert originally was completely random, seeing as "having an avatar that frightens me a little" can't possibly be a good, strong reason to lynch someone. And it is for these reasons that I continue to vote for you. In my mind, your defense just isn't cutting it for me.
i think mert is a decent info-lynch, some of the guys that wouldnt stop calling my reasoning earlier against mert scummy when imo it clearly wasnt earlier should definitely be looked at next if he does turn up a mafioso.