Magic: The Gathering,GO TEAM MS!

xRECKONERx · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:59 pm

that's pretty baller

no 3-drops is weird though

EDIT: just because I tend to find most of my decks have the largest curve at 3 mana

hitogoroshi · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 1:25 pm

Yeah, I noticed that making it, but it work out when you gotta put shit ON your creatures. Like, who needs a 3 drop when turn 3 is equipping your turn 2 kitesail to your turn 1 creature, giving it Rancor, and sending your 5/2 flying tramplin angry robot into the world

My only lost game wasn't about not having 3 drops even it was just having all of my buffs and no one to give them to.

ISO · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:20 pm

http://wizards.custhelp.com/app/answers ... a_id/68/=3

hitogoroshi · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:01 pm

Cheers Shea, that helps a lot.

dramonic · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:48 pm

Garruuuuuuuuuk

dramonic · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:52 pm

Fuck blood reckoning <.<
(different game)

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:08 pm

god that musta been lulzy

Shadow1psc · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:20 am

M13 swiss with Dramonic here, pulled this number...

m1g1 - Turn 3 centaur courser, turn 4 rancor+volcanic strength vs. a red deck, g2 same thing but on that 2/2 flying red dragon thing.

kdowns · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:40 pm

I just got MtG Online just a few seconds ago.

I am kdowns on it .-.

How original I am.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:06 pm

split for 1st in my FNM tonight, running UB.

2 rewinds, 2 harbor bandits, 2 fog banks, 2 duty bound dead

p good

PeregrineV · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:58 pm

Phylactery Lich FTW!

InflatablePie · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:01 pm

In post 1085, PeregrineV wrote:Phylactery Lich FTW!

I added this card to my budget ZombiePod deck (with Vamp Nighthawk in the sideboard since I have a free slot and it works as an alt 3-drop besides Messengers) and it works surprisingly well.

Oh, went 2-3 this week at a more... higher-level Standard tourney. Did better at the other store where there were less people running incredibly expensive decks everywhere. :<

bv310 · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:28 am

YOu haven't seen incredibly expensive yet. This is an incredibly expensive deck: http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=147227

Alternatively, this: http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showpost ... stcount=95

xRECKONERx · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:42 am

one was legacy, the other was a stupid Battle of Wits deck.

bv310 · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:34 am

What deck was he complaining about? He just said incredibly expensive. Both of the ones I posted are commonly played in tournaments, and are miles beyond the average standard deck in cost.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:40 am

Well I think he's specifically talking about standard events, and a lot of the tier 1 standard decks are pretty damn expensive.

GreyICE · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 5:24 pm

Oh, it's hard to beat ST4K$ (aka the four thousand dollar solution) for nutty deck costs

GreyICE · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 5:42 pm

Also, was that a miracle deck played in Legacy?

Anything to say about that, TSQ?

AGar · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:15 pm

That deck was pretty misleading being titled "UW Miracles" given there were four total miracles in it.

GreyICE · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:49 pm

I never said decks would be '46 miracles, 24 land.' I said that they'd see play. And miracle cards were fairly essential to that deck's success.

bv310 · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Sun Aug 19, 2012 3:39 am

A 1-of Entreat and 3 Terminus don't warrant naming it Miracles to me, but I'm not the one who named it. Glad to see the good miracles seeing play, but god damn it Entreat, go below $7 a piece so I can buy a playset of you.

AGar · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:03 am

In post 1094, GreyICE wrote:I never said decks would be '46 miracles, 24 land.' I said that they'd see play. And miracle cards were fairly essential to that deck's success.

I don't think anyone argued Miracles wouldn't see play. It was argued that they were gimmicky and wouldn't be widespread/core to multiple deckbuilding strategies/archetypes.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:47 pm

In post 1095, bv310 wrote:A 1-of Entreat and 3 Terminus don't warrant naming it Miracles to me, but I'm not the one who named it. Glad to see the good miracles seeing play, but god damn it Entreat, go below $7 a piece so I can buy a playset of you.

im liking bonfire being 40 bucks atm.

Sudo_Nym · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:02 pm

Just got back from the game store; got my first tourney win, then cracked Tamiyo.

GreyICE · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:08 pm

In post 1096, AGar wrote:
In post 1094, GreyICE wrote:I never said decks would be '46 miracles, 24 land.' I said that they'd see play. And miracle cards were fairly essential to that deck's success.

I don't think anyone argued Miracles wouldn't see play. It was argued that they were gimmicky and wouldn't be widespread/core to multiple deckbuilding strategies/archetypes.

Pretty sure you're wrong, so go back and look at what TSQ was arguing.

Also, 4 cards in a deck can define the entire deck. Am I wrong?