NY Mafia 155 - New Age Mafia II - Game Over!

[Simenon]

Also loved how you hammered nhamman, providing now explanation, after your only previous comment on him was "don't get the nhamman hate"

Whoever did that, it wasn't scooby. He only mentioned nhammen once before hammer, and it was to say he would read him and singer both and reach a conclusion--which took like... 8 minutes or something?

ctrl+f

[Simenon]

Also loved how you hammered nhamman, providing now explanation, after your only previous comment on him was "don't get the nhamman hate"

Whoever did that, it wasn't scooby. He only mentioned nhammen once before hammer, and it was to say he would read him and singer both and reach a conclusion--which took like... 8 minutes or something?

ctrl+f

Oh, I get it. Wrote "now" instead of "no" because I'm an idiot.

[Tierce]

Nope, I got it--he called him nammen instead of nhammen, which made my search string completely ignore that. You're right.

[AGar]

Shameless prod-dodge, content coming tomorrow.

[JDodge]

Shameless prod-dodge, content coming tomorrow.

you said that yesterday

STEP UP SON

[Glork]

Also dodging a prod. I need to review Sim. His strong favoring of a singer lych over a nham lynch isn't as egregious anymore.

Noteworthy: Scooby was one of the very last people voting for

neither

nham nor singer.

[JDodge]

Also dodging a prod. I need to review Sim. His strong favoring of a singer lych over a nham lynch isn't as egregious anymore.

Noteworthy: Scooby was one of the very last people voting for

neither

nham nor singer.

How was it egregious for him and not egregious for other people doing the exact same fucking thing? This is a question that nobody has been able to actually answer and I'm starting to find it extremely annoying.

[Tierce]

Why favor a goon over another goon? That's not remarkable in any manner.
(I'm also failing to see whether you mean "egregious" as "good" or "bad"; you people have a stupid language.)

[JDodge]

Why favor a goon over another goon? That's not remarkable in any manner.
(I'm also failing to see whether you mean "egregious" as "good" or "bad"; you people have a stupid language.)

it's still pretty obvious given context, start reading more thoroughly

[Glork]

Why favor a goon over another goon? That's not remarkable in any manner.
(I'm also failing to see whether you mean "egregious" as "good" or "bad"; you people have a stupid language.)

You seem to be missing my point.

I has Sim down as suspicious for, among other behaviors, wanting to lynch singer (who I thought was TOWN) over nham (who I was convinced was SCUM). Now that I know they were both scum, that "tell" no longer exists.

[Tierce]

No, that's exactly my point--they were both scum, they were both goons, it makes no sense for Simenon-scum to favor one over the other. I was just confused with the application of 'egregious'. (Admittedly, I woke up 5 min before I posted. ) I mused a bit over the final nhammen votes once Psyche claimed a guilty on singer, as it would make sense for scum to protect singer-PR over nhammen-vanilla (or a better player over another, but singer isn't a spectacular player either way), but with both of them goons, that theory makes no sense--as you've seen, though for a different reason.

On a somewhat related note, this also gives you townpoints; you had the same gut reaction I had, revulsion at the singer lynch when she started acting obstructive and emotional, due to the similarities with Maf. Maiden. Your behavior doesn't seem contrived, it was a "ew, no, been there done that this slot is town BAD LYNCH BAD LYNCH" from someone who thought they had gone through the same scenario recently.

[redFF]

Shameless prod-dodge, content coming tomorrow.

you said that yesterday

STEP UP SON

He's mafia!

[AGar]

Shameless prod-dodge, content coming tomorrow.

you said that yesterday

STEP UP SON

I was drunk the first time.

But I do need to step it up.

Anyways...

Why is Rhinox still alive? (Other than I didn't shoot him, and I still maintain Quilford was a death anti-miller, that flip is a lie).
Why is redFF so horribly bad at this?
Only thing I dislike about Quag is Hoopla was fairly obviously not-scum on D1 after the flash wagon and pretty much exact town response from umoms. Flaky/lurkish, yes. Scum? No.
Alternatively, Tierce needs to die a fiery death for her passive-aggressive "Let me try and pull a Houdini on a Quag-lynch."

JD, why do you keep parking fairly useless votes (Bella, Staeg) on people?

Scooby could die and I'd probably give no fucks one way or another. I'd vote him to see a lynch through, but I'd much rather kill Rhinox/redFF/Tierce first.

Sim is probtown.

[scooby]

just fyi scooby dying is a terrible idea

ill probably write some notes of all players alive by tomorrw

so that you can trhank me after lynching me and giving you all the scumbags in my wagon

brb

[Quagmire]

Why did I expect more intelligent play out of AGar?

[bv310]

So, first things first while I have time to sit and read, I had Simenon and Nhammen's actions backwards in my head. My vote was a mistake.

unvote

[AGar]

Why did I expect more intelligent play out of AGar?

You all flatter me, really.

[Bella]

Stag's not a useless vote, he's totally scum for the reaction to the Singer investigation result and Singer's reaction to the investigation result.

[OhGodMyLife]

Vote Count:

8 to lynch

scooby: 6 (Glork, Tierce, JDodge, Rhinox, Hoopla, Simenon)
Simenon: 2 (Staeg, scooby)
AGar: 1 (redFF)
Staeg: 1 (Bella)
Rhinox: 1 (Flameaxe)

Not Voting: 3 (Quagmire, AGar, bv310)

Current Deadline:

Saturday August 25th, 10 PM EST

[AGar]

No, that's exactly my point--they were both scum, they were both goons, it makes no sense for Simenon-scum to favor one over the other. I was just confused with the application of 'egregious'. (Admittedly, I woke up 5 min before I posted. ) I mused a bit over the final nhammen votes once Psyche claimed a guilty on singer, as it would make sense for scum to protect singer-PR over nhammen-vanilla (or a better player over another, but singer isn't a spectacular player either way), but with both of them goons, that theory makes no sense--as you've seen, though for a different reason.

On a somewhat related note, this also gives you townpoints; you had the same gut reaction I had, revulsion at the singer lynch when she started acting obstructive and emotional, due to the similarities with Maf. Maiden. Your behavior doesn't seem contrived, it was a "ew, no, been there done that this slot is town BAD LYNCH BAD LYNCH" from someone who thought they had gone through the same scenario recently.

Nhammen lynched Day 1. Psyche guilty on Singer Day 2.

What game are you reading?

[Tierce]

Apparently one that you aren't, since one of the gunsmith innocents is in your lynch list.

What is the part of the quote that you're disagreeing with? Did I slip to Portuguese again while I wasn't looking?
I was explaining why I don't think Simenon's reaction to the nhammen/singer wagons on D1 is scummy, unlike what was proposed on early D2 by Glork; there was no reason for Simenon-scum to push hypo-singer-town over nhammen-scum, given that singer flipped scum too.

[AGar]

I'm actually pretty sure I misread the post now, you phrased the spot about "the final nhammen votes once psyche claimed a guilty on singer" awkwardly for me.

And just because you have a gunsmith clear doesn't mean I wouldn't shoot you if I had another bullet to use.

[Tierce]

"Once Psyche claimed a guilty on singer

[on D2]

, I mused a bit over the final nhammen votes

[on D1]

, as it would make sense for scum to protect singer-PR over nhammen-vanilla

[on D1]

[...]

"

That's how it should read for easier parsing.


As for the rest--I'm baffled. How and when did I try to get Quagmire lynched?

[AGar]

768. The post was all sorts of "I'm scum, let me test the waters on this mislynch with the possibility of a fallback to get out of it."

[Tierce]

I haven't read New Age Mafia I. Yes, I know I should. Two claims of the same PR usually contradict each other. I've been burned badly for accepting both can be town; in Mafia Behind the Maiden, there was a town nation-cop and a scum rolecop, and both claimed nation-cop. I believed them both, ended up voting the wrong one and that led to a scum win that day. As scum, in Paranoia,

I

did the "this is too stupid a gambit to come from scum, so it's coming from town" counterclaim silliness, so I've been on both sides of the play.

The doubled roles wouldn't be atypical in this game due to New Age Mafia I, so I'm proceeding as before. I don't particularly care if voicing a doubtful opinion gives you an itchy finger.