In post 440, roflcopter wrote:this hayker wagon sprung up just as soon as the furry wagon was starting to gain steam. not a coincedence.
but you suggested the possibility of them being on a team?
In post 440, roflcopter wrote:this hayker wagon sprung up just as soon as the furry wagon was starting to gain steam. not a coincedence.
In post 450, petapan wrote:In post 440, roflcopter wrote:this hayker wagon sprung up just as soon as the furry wagon was starting to gain steam. not a coincedence.
but you suggested the possibility of them being on a team?
In post 452, kondi2424 wrote:
I just realized how stupid the idea of the Scum Rolecop wanting an early massclaim is.
In post 462, Furry wrote:Wait for scooby to make his response to me. Im pretty sure he is scum from something else I havent mentioned but want to see if he digs himself a deeper hole first.
In post 458, I Am Innocent wrote:It is interesting that once Hayker made known that 4 scum is mentioned in the scum role, that codex immediately jumped off.
In post 390, drmyshotgun wrote:In post 328, kondi2424 wrote:The only person who has made a decent post in the last two pages is petapan.
I'm on a trip, so I only have phone access until Saturday. It's also midnight. I'm not going to post much content right now.
Everyone who has posted in the past two pages should be ignored completely and stop spamming the thread but Natalie and petapan. The only two who have a chance of being scum are inte and shotgun. That is where our lynch should go today.
VOTE: inte
In post 375, kondi2424 wrote:VOTE: IAI You called?
I'm out of town but have phone access. That probably doesn't mean anything but slower posting for this game.
What changed Kondi?
And where are your responses to:
In post 329, Salamence20 wrote:Not so happy on Kondi's post.
Why should petapan be exempt from this?
Oh well. You probably don't have access to post for these. But enough to vote someone who just unvoted you.
In post 393, Furry wrote:
Town only roles will get snuffed out with no protection. I only hope the more I say it the more you either agree or just confirm you are Scum already.
You are wrong is all I can say. If you refuse to see thatyou are right, I cant help you. Who cares if town roles that arent the vigs die? It leaves confirmed town in the game. I would be thrilled to see a dead anything but a vig tomorrow.
In post 439, Furry wrote:
Seriously though, hayker wagon just looks all types of ugly. His push on inte is a town push because while he disagrees with my theory he is making a very good point against another who disagrees with it. The "Furry is scummy" post also is written from what I think almost any town would think at that point in time. He is almost for sure town.
Im not voting him, I dont care if it gets me lynched im not voting a strong town read.
In post 462, Furry wrote:Wait for scooby to make his response to me. Im pretty sure he is scum from something else I havent mentioned but want to see if he digs himself a deeper hole first.
In post 461, Nobody Special wrote:Well, I'm certainly willing to put Hayker at L-1 (I just didn't want to hammer, so I waited for the VC).
Vote: Hayker
In post 419, Hayker wrote:
As for my "explanation for the mafia to do", it's commen sense that a role claim like that will resolve itself. I was going to pull an example from Mafia 96, though after reading that it occurs to me the nature of my example was different. (Was remembering a miller being a cop) Either way, what I pointed out truly is a big case of wifom. Mafia leaves cop alive to get him lynched for being mafia, as opposed to mafia fakeclaim cop to delay getting lynched. Though in this case it is possible for the mafia to have a rolecop yadda yadda yadda. It's one big case of wifom. There is no point in lynching a claimed rolecop day 1, as foolish as the claim was. Considering there have already been 5 hard claims and 1 or 2 softclaims, can't remember offhand. It is highly unlikely there are any more town power roles. Though...a neighborizer seems a very weak and almost worthless role if you ask me. Perhaps I just am that unaware of the meta here.
Iso reads are incomplete as of now, still working on that post.
In post 463, roflcopter wrote:In post 462, Furry wrote:Wait for scooby to make his response to me. Im pretty sure he is scum from something else I havent mentioned but want to see if he digs himself a deeper hole first.
trying to bait scooby into a scummy response so you can call it scummy.
thats scummy.
In post 446, Code_X wrote:In post 436, scooby wrote:flail scum
Scum always use the flailing argument. Always cracks me up why they do ....
Plus your reads are pretty dreadful and consist of sheeping roflwhatshisname.
VOTE: Scooby
In post 265, scooby wrote:we should lynch Furry tomorrow if he isnt killed tonight.
Hayker wrote:Furry will likely be killed eventually if s/he is town due to powerole nature. If s/he stays alive a long time, it will make more sense to lynch him later for likely being mafia.