I'm vanilla.
okay.
Vote singer
I think we need a good wagon and I think she's been scummy enough to merit it. Also, she is a replacement for UT, who was super scummy.
Iam's post on nhammen is potentially great. How big is this sample size?
In post 245, Quilford wrote:
I suppose. My initial reaction to the claim was that it was town, but it's faded. I'd feel like a bit of an ass jumping back onto Rhinox though, so I'll wait.
In post 248, Simenon wrote:In post 247, nhammen wrote:
I agree with AGar that its bad. Except, why would scum say this either? Seems more playstyle than scummy.
huh
In post 314, Glork wrote:Can we just lynch Umoms like we wanted to ten pages ago? This is ridiculous.
In post 374, JDodge wrote:this is pretty much the dumbest shit ever, as a note~
In post 428, Glork wrote:Iiiiinteresting. I could go for a nhammen lynch based on that alone.
In post 271, singersigner wrote:Read most of the thread. My eyes tend to gloss over paragraphs' worth of stuff, but, meh.
The last couple of pages were actually entertaining.
Anyway, tally ho.
In post 401, singersigner wrote:In any case, massclaim shitfest over and all, rereading the thread cuz I forgot everything I read already. Except that I said the last two pages before I replaced in were funny...I wonder if I'll still find them funny...
In post 429, singersigner wrote:
I still haven't reread, but if I'm getting lynched, I'd prefer not to. Make it quick. None of this hemming and hawing over Nhammen nonsense.
In post 429, singersigner wrote:In post 428, Glork wrote:Iiiiinteresting. I could go for a nhammen lynch based on that alone.
lol@bv voting for me...and then claiming...
In post 429, singersigner wrote:In post 428, Glork wrote:Iiiiinteresting. I could go for a nhammen lynch based on that alone.
What's the point of saying this if you're not going to? But you should vote for me instead anyway.
In post 425, Simenon wrote:Iam's post on nhammen is potentially great. How big is this sample size?
singersigner wrote:then you came back and claimed when it was pretty much agreed that the MC was dead at that point.
In post 418, Staeg wrote:In post 415, Quagmire wrote:Jesus, you guys. Tierce is scum so hard. How do you not see it?
I'll be having that case you promised, thanks
iamausername wrote:singersigner wrote:then you came back and claimed when it was pretty much agreed that the MC was dead at that point.
wait what
How do you reach the conclusion that it is 'pretty much agreed that the massclaim is dead' when everybody has claimed but you, umoms and Quag?
In post 441, Rhinox wrote:Singer, why haven't you claimed yet?
In post 443, singersigner wrote:it [massclaim] had been established that it was a bad idea
In post 434, redFF wrote:oh shit let's see if nhammen can come back with a town game or scum game where he doesn't do what iaun's post says and if not we should lynch him on the spot.
In post 394, Glork wrote:I am lamenting the decision to request a massclaim, though. It should probably be kept to mini games, where universal cooperation and timely participation are more likely.