Robotics Mafia Mini 347 - Game Over

[Mastermind of Sin]

omg Mr. Johnson!

:hate:

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

oops

that was me

anyway

unvote

vote scalebane

die die die suck die suck die

[Scalebane]

The absence of a votecount is why I hopped on the pooky wagon. In short, I had no idea that it was such a bandwagon. If I'd realized he already had that many votes on him, I would *not* have added mine.

[Glork]

Scalebane, you're capable of reading, correct?

Is it safe to assume that you are also capable of counting votes?



If you answered "Yes" to the above questions, there is no reason you should have "accidentally bandwagoned" a player.

[Romanus]

Scalebane, that is pretty fishy. I mean you should have at least seen a bunch of posts with people voting for pooky, I mean, either count yourself or ask for a votecount. If that would have been the hammer, would you have used that excuse as well. "Irresponsible" voting is not good, at all. This strikes me as not "irresponsible" but rather a contrived excuse. I will decide whether to vote for you or not later, after I have checked things out more thoroughly.

[Twito]

The absence of a votecount is why I hopped on the pooky wagon. In short, I had no idea that it was such a bandwagon. If I'd realized he already had that many votes on him, I would *not* have added mine.

Oh that's scummy. I don't buy those lame excuses for accidently putting your vote and "if I only knew I wouldn't have voted".
You must have read the thread before you voted so you were able to see there were votes on Pooky. If you didn't read the thread and just noticed votes on Pooky it's even scummier.

Unvote

But I have my eye on you Pooky.

Vote: Scalebane

[Scalebane]

Well maybe it's the fact that I found pooky suspicious. I'm not saying that I regret my vote. Have I unvoted? No. Kthx. I'm happy with my vote on pooky and so I see no reason to unvote him. If it had been the hammer vote, yes, that would've been bad. But if he had turned up scum, would you have been this suspicious of me?

[Coron]

Scalebane, that is pretty fishy.

I thought SCALE bane meant he was the bane of fishies?

[Bacde]

Why are you happy with your vote on Pooky?

[Scalebane]

Perhaps an equally relevant question would be "Why are the other 4 people also, apparently, equally happy with their votes on pooky?"

It's because I don't see anything else to go on during day 1 except for hunches and intuition and whatever it is that you happen to see on your scumdar. And Pooky looked suspicious to me and so I voted him. It would've been prudent to realize just how many other votes were on him, but the number of votes on him does not, to me, make him seem any less suspicious. And the fact that his vote in response to me was justified with eloquent and mature "die die die suck die suck die" I think my vote is going to be staying on pooky.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

nice trying to pass the buck there scumbag.

just die now K thx?

[Scalebane]

Oh, wait, I thought I learned someplace that if I'm A TOWNIE that I should try and keep the TOWN from lynching me. My bad. I guess i should not defend myself at all so that pookythefagtasticalbear can get on with his perfect scum hunting abilities.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

oooh going into personal insults to try to distract from the fact you're scum?

[Romanus]

Scalebane you are making no sense whatsoever

The absence of a votecount is why I hopped on the pooky wagon. In short, I had no idea that it was such a bandwagon. If I'd realized he already had that many votes on him, I would *not* have added mine.

I'm not saying that I regret my vote. Have I unvoted? No. Kthx. I'm happy with my vote on pooky and so I see no reason to unvote him.

Also this

If it had been the hammer vote, yes, that would've been bad. But if he had turned up scum, would you have been this suspicious of me?

is an argument ad futuram, also known as a logical fallacy. If we knew who was scum, we wouldn't have to go through all of this. Also, yes, if you keep your vote on pooky and he gets lynched and he come up scum, then you are not that suspicious, as none of the aforementioned have come to pass, you are not above suspicion, especially since you are acting so scummy.

[EnderX]

unvote

vote: Scalebane

Something about his posts is setting me off. Problem is, aside from the stuff that's already been brought up, I'm not sure what it is. There's just something there that doesn't feel right.

[Romanus]

It could be the sarcasm.

[Twito]

Perhaps an equally relevant question would be "Why are the other 4 people also, apparently, equally happy with their votes on pooky?"

I was perfectly happy with my vote on Pooky until you told you voted him by accident. Your vote on him wasn't scummy. The excuse you gave later that you voted by accident was scummy enough for me to be more happy with my vote on you.

[help im a bug]

Yeah, I'm willing to hammer scalebane if a couple more people want to get on. Hell, I'd be willing to vote him just for "fagtastical".

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

I think I'm ready for a Scalebane claim.[/b]

[Scalebane]

I'm an SK.

[help im a bug]

uh. lynch pls?

if it's a joke...

lynch pls?

[help im a bug]

oh, and

vote: scalebane

to go along with that.

[Glork]

...que?



Ready to vote, pending an explanation from Scalebane.

[Scalebane]

I'm ... not joking.

[Twito]

:D
It's always fun when scum claims scum