MeMeMeet Mafia (Game Over!)

[Yosarian2]

Well, we've only got 2 days till deadline; we can get an extra 3 days if 1/3 of the town sends pms to the mod asking for an extension, but there dosn't seem to be enough people around for that at the moment anyway. I think Spork need to claim now, or he's probably going to die.

[MeMe]

Just pointing out that mith's rules state that majority is still needed at deadline.

I'll switch to spork before deadline hits if it hasn't been lifted by that time -- a couple others will need to do the same.

[kristocker]

What is going on here?? I'm so confused.

Unvote: spork76

I feel like I'm getting played here. Not just because of what MeMe said, but Fritzler's last comment, too.

I feel the same way.

My goal is not to defend spork, but to figure out what is going on. I thought Thesp had an agenda (although I didn't think lyncher until MeMe mentioned it); I thought he was just being aggressive townie. I tried to get a second bandwagon going, just to change things up a big, but it fizzled (which I can't understand if Yos wants to lynch Fletcher tomorrow - why not join Fletcher's wagon today?)

Please tell me why jumping on spork's bandwagon will help the town. Convince me and I'll change my vote. But for now, my vote stands.

[Yosarian2]

Majority still needed at deadline, huh?

Well, if we don't lynch spork, we're probably not going to lynch anyone. Unless we can extend the deadline. I'm still hoping spork claims, but even if he does it won't be easy putting together a new wagon.

unvote:fletcher

vote:spork

[spork76]

I am an innocent trying to get more meme meet points than a specific person. If I have less points than that person I can do an investigation, but I can only do it once.

[Yosarian2]

Crap.

unvote:spork

vote:fletcher

Don't lynch spork, he's almost certanly telling the truth.

[Quagmire]

Vote: Fritzler

That was the scummiest thing I've ever heard. Explain yourself.

[mlaker]

Why do you need to get more points than this person? And if you get less than them why do you get an investigation? I want more elaboration.

[Fletcher]

I dislike how both you and Fletch make the same point. "He's joking, your reasons are crap." But I'm the only one gettin' hate because I'm the only one defending my vote and giving reasons for it.

Exactly. I feel like you trying to give a reason which, to me, signifies that you think you might "get hate" if you don't. No one else seems to feel the need to give a reason, though.

With seven people on a wagon, there have to be reasons.

I

beg

to diffuh (= differ)! I definitely don't understand sporks role but I would be amazed if spork just made anything partially believable up, thus;

Unvote: spork

I'm confused as to why I'm being voted. If it can be explained, great, if not, whatever.

Vote: Atticus

[mlaker]

Fletcher, do you mean no one else needs to give a reason to vote for spork? Are you criticizing giving reasons? There were people asking for reasons and I don't understand at all why a player who had a reason to vote someone wouldn't say it.

FOS Fletcher

And I agree that I don't understand spork's role but I'm not letting him off the hook. His role claim was really odd, it sounds fake. I'd like to restate my call for an elaboration.

[Fletcher]

No, I'm saying that Atticus pulled some reasons to vote spork out of nowhere. Come to thin kof it he could have just truly thought that those reasons were good.

Both of those scenarios are vote-worthy in my opinion.

[mlaker]

You think someone believing in reasons to vote someone is vote worthy? You're my next vote.

[mlaker]

"I, myself being a bandwagoner know the psyche of one. But I generally pull off it, or get lynched cause of it."-spork
I never noticed this. It looks to me like spork was trying to start a counter bandwagon. There's a reason for spork.

"Don't lynch spork, he's almost certanly telling the truth."-Yosarian2
?

[Fletcher]

You think someone believing in reasons to vote someone is vote worthy? You're my next vote.

Yeah, not the best reasoning is it? A little hypocritical you might say.

I just think that Atticus tried to over-explain his vote when it was unneeded.

[Yosarian2]

His role claim was really odd, it sounds fake. I'd like to restate my call for an elaboration.

In case you didn'tget my last post

HIS ROLE IS NOT FAKE

I have the exact same role.

SPORK IS NOT SCUM. EVERYONE UNVOTE HIM NOW AND VOTE SOMEONE ELSE.

We have to lynch someone who is not spork, and fast. Also, anyone who is pro-town, you need to PM the mod and ask for more time before deadline; the mod said that if a third of the town does that we get an extra 3 days, which we really need right now.

[mlaker]

unovte spork, Vote Fletcher

How is that hippocritical?

[Fletcher]

unovte spork, Vote Fletcher

How is that hippocritical?

I said

I

was being hypocritical. Unless you understood me, in which case I don't understand or care.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Wow, a lot has happened since I left on vacation. Unfortunately, I think both Atticus and Spork are acting pretty normal, at least consistent with my MeMeMeet experiences. Fletcher is giving me vibes, but I'm not sure whether they are good or bad vibes. It's kinda in the middle. However, the wierd thing for me is that I usually don't even notice Fletcher when I play with him, and he's pretty much always protown in those instances. Therefore, even though it's not much to go on, I will:

unvote: Quagmire, Vote: Fletcher

FoS: Quagmire

Why did your last post call out Fritzler, but not say anything about Spork's claim or Yosarian2's unfounded (at the time) assertion that Spork was almost certainly innocent?

[Thesp]

His role claim was really odd, it sounds fake. I'd like to restate my call for an elaboration.

In case you didn'tget my last post

HIS ROLE IS NOT FAKE

I have the exact same role.

SPORK IS NOT SCUM. EVERYONE UNVOTE HIM NOW AND VOTE SOMEONE ELSE.

We have to lynch someone who is not spork, and fast. Also, anyone who is pro-town, you need to PM the mod and ask for more time before deadline; the mod said that if a third of the town does that we get an extra 3 days, which we really need right now.

I have rolebased information that says this cannot be the case. I think Yosarian2 is lying to protect his scum buddy.

Confirm Vote: spork76. FOS: Yosarian2.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

vote Spork76

nuff said

[Mastermind of Sin]

well this is interesting...I was thinking that perhaps Yosarian2 is scum confirming someone that he's pretty sure was telling the truth, but I didn't think he would be gutsy/dumb enough to protect his scumbuddy that much on Day 1...Thesp's vague counter to Yosarian2's assertions doesn't really convince me to give up on Fletcher, though.

[Fletcher]

*gets voted*

[Fritzler]

His role claim was really odd, it sounds fake. I'd like to restate my call for an elaboration.

In case you didn'tget my last post

HIS ROLE IS NOT FAKE

I have the exact same role.

am i the only one who thinks if that was true yos would need more points than spork and thus would want to kill him?

[Mastermind of Sin]

yeah, i think you are, since neither Yosarian2 or spork has said that the other is the one they have to get more points than.

[Yosarian2]

I have rolebased information that says this cannot be the case. I think Yosarian2 is lying to protect his scum buddy.

Confirm Vote: spork76. FOS: Yosarian2.

(shrug) Either Spork has the exact same role as I do, or he was somehow given the exact details of my role by the mod and used that to make a fake claim.

My role-name is Point Whore, by the way, same as the dead NPC.