In post 1023, Llamarble wrote:Ugh, I am actually in danger of getting mislynched again.
You can still do the "post up a storm" thing if you're town, right? And why the "again" here?
In post 1023, Llamarble wrote:Ugh, I am actually in danger of getting mislynched again.
In post 1000, singersigner wrote:In post 993, singersigner wrote:@Llamarble...what makes CES's vote/push on Shea any different than mine? I never once moved my vote after that and pushed rather consistently/hard, yet that doesn't seem to be a problem for you.
In post 944, Captain Falcon wrote:
In post 942, singersigner wrote:Though I do agree with wondering why Llamarble felt the need to specify that he could provide "proof" of his absence...
I third that notion.
VOTE: Llmarble
In post 826, Zachrulez wrote:In post 824, Matias wrote:I'd rather hear from Llamarble first before I make judgment on him.
I've heard a lot in the silence that has been coming from him since the end of day 1.
In post 1010, Zachrulez wrote:In post 1003, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 998, Llamarble wrote:Scum want to be on losing wagons that they can look like they legitimately believe in, and voting lurkers who are likely to show up and push the lynch away are good options for that.
I posit to you that the shealynch would've gone through if Amrun hadn't been V/LA at the end there, so I very much question the relevance of this.
You can get more basic than that and say his vote was key in getting Amrun lynched and in avoiding Shealynch.
In post 1026, Llamarble wrote:It wasn't inadequate, it just took a bit more time than usual to find, which wasn't something that stuck as an important part of the metaing experience. I was extremely unspecific about the metaing I did. Do you really believe I'd go back and look things up again and then give as minimal specifics as I did about it?
Llamarble wrote:
In post 1000, singersigner wrote:In post 993, singersigner wrote:@Llamarble...what makes CES's vote/push on Shea any different than mine? I never once moved my vote after that and pushed rather consistently/hard, yet that doesn't seem to be a problem for you.
This argument was entirely retarded and I have explained why it was so. If you are unsatisfied then explain why and I shall go into greater detail.
In post 1025, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 1023, Llamarble wrote:Ugh, I am actually in danger of getting mislynched again.
You can still do the "post up a storm" thing if you're town, right? And why the "again" here?
In post 1027, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 1026, Llamarble wrote:It wasn't inadequate, it just took a bit more time than usual to find, which wasn't something that stuck as an important part of the metaing experience. I was extremely unspecific about the metaing I did. Do you really believe I'd go back and look things up again and then give as minimal specifics as I did about it?
If you believe I'm scum here, then it's fairly obvious it's inadequate since my play here is distinctly different + year old meta is just not that reliable in general? And yes, I do believe that; it looks townier to look like you didn't look it up.
Llamarble wrote:
In post 1000, singersigner wrote:In post 993, singersigner wrote:@Llamarble...what makes CES's vote/push on Shea any different than mine? I never once moved my vote after that and pushed rather consistently/hard, yet that doesn't seem to be a problem for you.
This argument was entirely retarded and I have explained why it was so. If you are unsatisfied then explain why and I shall go into greater detail.
? You answered this in #1002 and your answer was certainly meaningful enough to justify the question.
In post 1030, Llamarble wrote:I don't think your play here is as different as you seem to. Older meta isn't nonuseful.
You think that I went back and looked things up but did not notice that they happened a long time ago?? what?
In post 1030, Llamarble wrote:I've been on a lot of different wagons, now including both of your favorite ones other than me?
In post 1021, Llamarble wrote:
VOTE: Benmage
THIS IS THE PATH.
Benmage has been passive all game after shifting his reads list around some on D1.
He keeps his vote on CES without pushing, CES lists him as scum without voting him.
In post 123, Benmage wrote:
CES for his reasoning why Johhog is town, double confirmed them both.
Amrun because he feels genuine. I mean shit he looks real obvious.
SP gut.
He didn't read what CES said about Johhog carefully but called both of them clear town for it.
He has been buddying me for unclear reasons all game.
I haven't had access enough to be obvllamatown till now.
And he does love being scum.
In post 999, Nachomamma8 wrote:Zach, do you have recent scum meta of you as a lone wolf?
singersinger wrote:Nacho can wait til tomorrow even though I'm grumpy that this slot is getting away yet again.
singersinger wrote:even though I thoroughly disagree
CES wrote:Also, regardless of which games you looked at exactly, I'm pretty sure my play this game would compare positively to scum games of mine from a year back.
Llamarble wrote:which pretty much confirms me as town simply because I don't play off the top of my head as scum when I don't recall something clearly. When I'm scum, I am very good at reconstructing a clear thought process behind everything.
Llamarble wrote:Can I get some more Benmage votes or responses?
In post 1035, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 999, Nachomamma8 wrote:Zach, do you have recent scum meta of you as a lone wolf?
Please stop intentionally or unintentionally ignoring my questions.
In post 1038, Zachrulez wrote:In post 1035, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 999, Nachomamma8 wrote:Zach, do you have recent scum meta of you as a lone wolf?
Please stop intentionally or unintentionally ignoring my questions.
What does this mean? A game where I was the only remaining scum? You'd have to go WAY back if that's what you're asking.
In post 1039, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1038, Zachrulez wrote:In post 1035, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 999, Nachomamma8 wrote:Zach, do you have recent scum meta of you as a lone wolf?
Please stop intentionally or unintentionally ignoring my questions.
What does this mean? A game where I was the only remaining scum? You'd have to go WAY back if that's what you're asking.
Where you were scum as Zachrulez, and not hydraing with Sotty.
In post 1040, Oversoul wrote:In post 1039, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1038, Zachrulez wrote:In post 1035, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 999, Nachomamma8 wrote:Zach, do you have recent scum meta of you as a lone wolf?
Please stop intentionally or unintentionally ignoring my questions.
What does this mean? A game where I was the only remaining scum? You'd have to go WAY back if that's what you're asking.
Where you were scum as Zachrulez, and not hydraing with Sotty.
For the record, Paranoia Mafia, Sotty never posted in the Scum QT and Zach said that he would be alone, but left the chance open for Sotty to join if she felt like it.
Sotty at that time had also proclaimed she was not going to join anymore games so that supports my belief.
I don't know if they discussed the game outside of the quicktopic though.
In post 1026, Llamarble wrote:I got mislynched in Nomination Mafia and Bedtime stories. I had gotten really used to not ever getting lynched prior to that.
In post 1036, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Llamarble wrote:Can I get some more Benmage votes or responses?
Why Benmage and not Socio?
In post 1036, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Llamarble wrote:which pretty much confirms me as town simply because I don't play off the top of my head as scum when I don't recall something clearly. When I'm scum, I am very good at reconstructing a clear thought process behind everything.
Would you self-meta as scum?
In post 1033, Llamarble wrote:I am not seeking to get on your good side.
I am pointing out that you saying my wagon choices have been bad doesn't make a lot of sense.
What beyond OMGUS did you mean when you said that?
In post 1033, Llamarble wrote:Dr Who isn't insanely long ago and you have several behaviors that felt like here.
Snarky terse posting, 'nope' type posts, a scumteam call, and some vote yup let's lynch x stuff.
I didn't get any "Oh I'm wrong about this he doesn't do his townie things here as scum" from your meta so much as 'ok this pretty much fits with what he can fake', which is most of what I use meta for.
In post 1033, Llamarble wrote:Zach's mafia world looks different than that. You are thinking about things instead of distilling down to the most basic things that you do. Certainly more different from your play this game than Dr Who.
In post 1036, Nachomamma8 wrote:CES wrote:Also, regardless of which games you looked at exactly, I'm pretty sure my play this game would compare positively to scum games of mine from a year back.
Wait, why?