The game of the year: town won!

Amrun · Post Post #1700 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2012 4:06 pm

Kondi is also town.

UberNinja · Post Post #1701 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2012 6:06 pm

FYI: Trevor is actually probably town based on post 1682. SpyreX, I just can't tell... I'm not getting town vibes and I'm not getting real scum vibes either. Third party does sound about right for him. BBmolla still needs to die. Very badly. I am ambivalent on Lowman atm; I will read him more.

Luffy seems very, very, very town to me, and I wouldn't lynch him if you paid me with cake, cookies, sex, milk chocolate eggs, or actual real money.

UberNinja · Post Post #1702 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2012 6:09 pm

Oh. Well that was easy. There's only 5 Lowman posts. That also explains why I hadn't had an opinion on him yet.

If nobody can articulate a fucking good reason why he's scum, I'm going to start hunting out of the Lowman wagon because if he's not obv scum for something I'm missing, then it's guaranteed there are at least 1 if not 2 scum out of his wagon of 4. And them's pretty damn good odds.

In post 1296, LowMan wrote:Sorry for absence during day 1, game is moving faster than I'd anticipated..

But based on the part I've read I do agree with the current lynch target.

VOTE: T-bone

In post 1311, LowMan wrote:Ouch, another alt slip.. sorry it happened Luffy. Thanks for the link to that post though, I remember seeing it but then couldn't find it when I went looking.

Just hope I can avoid the same fate.. though it shouldn't be hard as all my active games atm are on this name. (I am an alt, as I said in the signup thread..)

And for the record, yes I have inherited Lupo's spot.

T-bone is at L-2 I believe after my vote. Let's see more votes people.

In post 1406, LowMan wrote:Oh, FFS.

Someone deserves rope for that...

And is lucky I'm not a role with a kill ability.

VOTE: Kondi2424

In post 1424, LowMan wrote:Yeah I agree, I over-reacted...

And based on my own past experience with him, I'm fine with a redFF PL even if he's town. In a game this big we can still afford plenty of VT mislynches.

UNVOTE: Kondi2424

VOTE: redFF

In post 1442, LowMan wrote:
In post 1431, redFF wrote:
In post 1424, LowMan wrote:Yeah I agree, I over-reacted...

And based on my own past experience with him, I'm fine with a redFF PL even if he's town. In a game this big we can still afford plenty of VT mislynches.

UNVOTE: Kondi2424

VOTE: redFF

Oh god are you an alt of someone I was mean to in GD too?

No, my opinion is based on a game we were both in.. I won't give specifics cause it has the potential to out who I am, which would be a Bad Thing™

Taking a break from the game now as I am technically on v/la (as declared in my other ongoing games) I will return Friday.

That's it. I'm not seeing anything overtly scummy.

Lowman, who are you an alt of, please?

mykonian · Post Post #1703 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2012 9:01 pm

votecount

luffy (6): staeg, rhinox, BBmolla, Nobody special, mattP, zdenek
lowman (4): amrun, elmo teh azn, luffy, PeregrineV
BBmolla (3): theamateur, zajnet, syndromeofadown
YYR (2): RedFF, trevor
PeregrineV (2): Hoopla, zoraster
Trevor (1): uberninja
RedFF (1): Lowman
Spyrex (1): callforjudgement
zdenek (1): Hoopla
kondi2424 (1): TechnoWC

UberNinja · Post Post #1704 (ISO) » Thu May 24, 2012 9:08 pm

luffy's town. so that's 1 or 2 ot of amrun, elmo, and peregrine who are scum

bank on it

Trevor · Post Post #1705 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 1:26 am

Why are the two players who are closest to confirmed town not saying shit?

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1706 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 1:28 am

In post 1705, Trevor wrote:Why are the two players who are closest to confirmed town not saying shit?

Who are you referring to?

petapan · Post Post #1707 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 2:40 am

novelty of day 1 quickly being replaced with defeatism as the sheer crushing impossibility of actually being able to lynch scum in a setup like this sinks in

petapan · Post Post #1708 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 2:42 am

VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

manho · Post Post #1709 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:01 am

i'm 10 pages behind again.

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1710 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:15 am

In post 1708, petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?

Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.

I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.

Unvote
Vote: Lowman

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1711 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:17 am

In post 1709, manho wrote:i'm 10 pages behind again.

LOL, only in a game like this could it ever be possible, haha.

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1712 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:24 am

manho, an easy start would be to ISO the top wagons (Lowman, Luffy and BB (on second thoughts, BB might take awhile

)) and see if any of them appear scummy.

Trevor · Post Post #1713 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:39 am

TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1705, Trevor wrote:Why are the two players who are closest to confirmed town not saying shit?

Who are you referring to?

Ellibareth, who has some sort of day-kill ability, and Kairyuu, who has some sort of lynch-override ability.

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1714 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:48 am

In post 1713, Trevor wrote:
TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1705, Trevor wrote:Why are the two players who are closest to confirmed town not saying shit?

Who are you referring to?

Ellibareth, who has some sort of day-kill ability, and Kairyuu, who has some sort of lynch-override ability.

Is there an actual example of Ellibereth performing a daykill, or did he just claim that?

Rhinox · Post Post #1715 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:50 am

In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1708, petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?

Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.

I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.

Unvote
Vote: Lowman

This is a bad post.

kondi2424 · Post Post #1716 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:51 am

In post 1715, Rhinox wrote:
In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1708, petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?

Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.

I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.

Unvote
Vote: Lowman

This is a bad post.

This is a bad post because it didn't explain.

Trevor · Post Post #1717 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:51 am

He tried to, but was unsuccessful for whatever reason. I believe the claim, but expect him to actually kill someone some time in the future.

Rhinox wrote:
In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1708, petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?

Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.

I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.

Unvote
Vote: Lowman

This is a bad post.

As is every vote on lowman. Your point?

kondi2424 · Post Post #1718 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:53 am

Trevor, I think it was a joke.

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1719 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 3:59 am

In post 1715, Rhinox wrote:
In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1708, petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?

Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.

I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.

Unvote
Vote: Lowman

This is a bad post.

Already gave reasoning as to why I thought Lowman was scummy, and said I would be happy to lynch him.

I'm not convinced he is scum, but I have a good feeling he is, plus he was one of the misinformed voters on the T-Bone wagon. ISO him; he lurked, wanted T-Bone dead with no reasoning and what seemed to be a policy vote, and even said he wanted RedFF dead even though he thought he was town.

In this game it is pretty hard to pick apart lazy townies from lurkerish scum, but Lowman seems the best bet.

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1720 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 4:01 am

I realise I wasn't very clear when I said 'lynching lurkers won't get us anywhere'. To clarify what I meant was, lynching people simply for the sake of them being lurkers is probably going to kill a lot more townies than scum; like what happened with the CC lynch. However, Lowman's case isn't just that he is a lurker.

kondi2424 · Post Post #1721 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 4:04 am

In post 1719, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1715, Rhinox wrote:
In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1708, petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?

Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.

I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.

Unvote
Vote: Lowman

This is a bad post.

Already gave reasoning as to why I thought Lowman was scummy, and said I would be happy to lynch him.

I'm not convinced he is scum, but I have a good feeling he is, plus he was one of the
misinformed
voters on the T-Bone wagon. ISO him; he lurked, wanted T-Bone dead with no reasoning and what seemed to be a policy vote, and even said he wanted RedFF dead even though he thought he was town.

In this game it is pretty hard to pick apart lazy townies from lurkerish scum, but Lowman seems the best bet.

VOTE: TeCh

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1722 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 4:07 am

???

misinformed, meaning he's been skimming the thread and posting votes for no reason... As lurkers do...

Not sure why that is vote worthy, I have already used the term 'misinformed voters' a couple of times now.

TeChNoWC · Post Post #1723 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 4:09 am

In post 1721, kondi2424 wrote:
In post 1719, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1715, Rhinox wrote:
In post 1710, TeChNoWC wrote:
In post 1708, petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman

Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.

Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?

Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.

I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.

Unvote
Vote: Lowman

This is a bad post.

Already gave reasoning as to why I thought Lowman was scummy, and said I would be happy to lynch him.

I'm not convinced he is scum, but I have a good feeling he is, plus he was one of the
misinformed
voters on the T-Bone wagon. ISO him; he lurked, wanted T-Bone dead with no reasoning and what seemed to be a policy vote, and even said he wanted RedFF dead even though he thought he was town.

In this game it is pretty hard to pick apart lazy townies from lurkerish scum, but Lowman seems the best bet.

VOTE: TeCh

This is a bad post because it didn't explain.

kondi2424 · Post Post #1724 (ISO) » Fri May 25, 2012 4:24 am

Misinformed implies town. The scum know themselves, and are therefore informed.

But clearly you weren't thinking as deeply as I was. VOTE: BB