In post 141, BK201 wrote: In post 65, noraaa wrote:I"m probably failing for always being on my ipod in class.
I'm going to minimize you guys and try to work on my paper for a while.
In post 102, noraaa wrote:Me? I'm not on anyone's side but the truth.
(cue law and order theme song)
That first post seemed unprompted, like she felt the pressure to keep her presence up. Whether or not she is mafia might depend on how she usually plays, but have never played with her so idk how that is.
Why did you include the second one?
Like I said, we had been conversational. If that bothers you it bothers you but I wasn't the only one doing it and it was in response to something someone had said.. I believe crypto probably. About being online constantly.
For the record I don't feel pressure to do anything, especially not in the first half hour of the game, when more than half of the people hadn't even shown their faces. Really now.
In post 163, inte wrote: In post 161, BK201 wrote:Nobody else sees noraaa as suspicious? Did I join a game where people just don't vote their friends?
yeah. she didn't answer my question about why she was defending hiraki
@crypto people who change votes way too much bother me, you're probably going be stuck as a scumread most of the game because of it
I did answer you, in fact. By saying I wasn't defending Hiraki. The reply in question, I believe, is in this very post above you. I don't know his alignment, why do I care if you vote him as long as you give reasons that make sense as a train of thought. I was asking why you voted and ran, that's not really defending him. Like.. at all.
In post 165, mb53 wrote:How does changing your vote often make someone scum?
I've found the reverse to be true in people's minds, actually. I'm surprised inte hasn't ever once run into being voted JUST for a lack of voting every other second.
You seem to have done this a few times now, honestly. In a game like this, you sorta need to be able to defend your reasoning when asked, and sometimes (gasp) know to do so even before being asked.
In post 197, mb53 wrote:
In post 193, redFF wrote:gonna go ahead and
vote:mb
the fact that he didn't know the dayvig was a joke suggests he's not reading the thread/paying attention.
And that makes me scum... how?
this just redeemed you somewhat in my eyes. Also yeah, not paying attn/being dense doesn't necessarily make someone scummy it just makes them someone who isn't playing well.
--
Thoughts that don't have quotes cause I'm tired as fuck and don't want to chase down quote towers anymore-
Pine- Blondie being an alt or not only matters in-game if they're someone else in game, thus breaking the rule on page one.
Tell me how it matters otherwise? (worth noting that Blondie has not come back since but that isn't confirmation of anything until we see them post again.. however it's been a full two days nearly)
also I didn't realize I was defending crypto, thanks for letting me know. I thought I was just responding with my thoughts on people's comments. But you know me better than me, so.
BK201 decided to chase someone else when noone played with his scummy nora questioning. If he really felt I was scummy why not explain why, try to win people over? In my last game (lost to time, unfortunately) every single person in my game thought someone was town but me. I didn't roll over, I made a case and pushed it.
VOTE BK201
Engineers accepted the word “planetary” in its epicyclic sense, but I was always conscious that it also meant “wandering,” “erratic.”
Compassion, Common Sense, and Context should always go together.
