Did you notice he's not voting me right now? He's wrong, and it's not something that should be discussed today, which he agreed with. If you're pro-town, you need to let this go for now.
As for Tamuz, he said yesterday that he's not getting role-based information anymore. So why, exactally, are you voting for me?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
Edit: to be clear, that last question is directed at Tamuz. If you claim you're not getting role-based information, Tamuz, you can't just say "vote yos" and expect everyone to follow you. So do you have any reason for voting me?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
. The "Don't lynch me, it's bad for the town for reasons that I won't tell you right now" argument has never impressed me. Someone claimed 100% certainty that Yos is scum, it's pretty hard to put that down, and Yos clearly isn't succeeding so far. Plus, the attempt to deflect attention to Tamuz is obvious.
When someone claims '100% sure' that someone else is scum, in my eyes, they're putting their own life on the line..and I'm fine with that. The possibilities are as follows: A)Yos 2 really is scum.
B)Spamwise is scum and is lying. In this case, he's making the same mistake that everyone does..that he can say '100% sure' when he didn't mean it and make up an excuse to get out of it tomorrow. It's easy enough to make sure that he doesn't get away with this.
C)Spamwise is townie and is simply a crappy player. It's early enough in the game still that I find it acceptable to lynch crappy players just to get rid of them and prevent them from further damaging the game.
So, no matter what, the town will be fine if Yos2 gets lynched. Obviously if Spam comes back and says 'Well, maybe not 100% sure'..that'll change things.
(sigh) This is moving too fast, and no one has given any reasons at all. I guess I'm going to have to give a partial claim. So, fine. I'm a mason.
I'd rather not claim the flavor of the mason group today if I don't have to; I believe I have a good reason for holding back this information for the moment.
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
I agree with cyan here, a player claiming 100% certainty on a certain issue is a pretty bold action, so right now I think it's a coin flip between whether SW is lying with his 100% claim or Yos is lying with his mason claim. I'll do a reread to see which one is more likely.
I've found things I didn't like in like 75% of your posts. And it's always different--over the top, sketchy logic, shaky voting reason. There are plenty of others to deal with first, but I'm certain I'm not the only person who's noticed that you stand out.
Note: I will be away from June 24 - July 1. I will understand if I need to be replaced, but I have requested that the Mod allow me to continue playing if at all possible.
I will be posting this in all of my games which are not in night.
