Mini 332 - Camp Scum Lake - Mod Abandoned

[Rosso Carne]

confirm vote: varian

Yeah, I think explosions in the face of a vote, esp against an obvious jerk is a definite scum tell.

[ChannelDelibird]

FoS: Varian

for over-reacting, but I'll keep my vote on yellowbounder until he posts.

[yellowbounder]

Fos: ChannelDelibird

for not noticing that I have already posted.

[serinah80]

unvote
vote

Rosso Carne

If Varian over reacted, then Rosso started it by being agressive.
Acting like a jerk means acting like a scum in my book. Especially so early in the game...

(note: I didn't say he was a jerk, I said he acted like it.)

8)

[serinah80]

unvote
vote

Rosso Carne

I'm not sure if I should have bolden(bolded?) the name also. So just in case:

vote: Rosso Crane

[audacesiuvat]

Vote Count:

Rosso Carne (3): yellowbounder, Varian, serinah80
Varian (2): Twito, Rosso Carne
Yellowbounder (1): ChannelDelibird
ChannelDelibird (1): PBuG
TB (1): B Rob

Not Voting (4): warpdragon, Erotomachia, Maverick, TB

With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.

[Maverick]

This is such a weird arguement, but I guess it is only Day 1, we don't have much to go by except explosions about name definitions.

Vote:Serinah80

for adding the third vote on Rosso without good reason, and for voting me earlier.

[ChannelDelibird]

Fos: ChannelDelibird

for not noticing that I have already posted.

Well, I'll be damned. O.o

unvote

Anyway, there was no need to put three on Rosso Carne yet.

Vote: Serinah80

I don't see why Rosso Carne should have any votes yet anyway.

[TB]

Random

vote: PBuG

And hello B Rob, it's good to see you too

[serinah80]

I would agree, that I had no real reason for voting my first but I defenitely had a reason for voting against Rosso.

And I don't see problem with it being a third vote. Not llike it's gonna kill him or anything...

[Rosso Carne]

unvote
vote

Rosso Carne

If Varian over reacted, then Rosso started it by being agressive.
Acting like a jerk means acting like a scum in my book. Especially so early in the game...

(note: I didn't say he was a jerk, I said he acted like it.)

8)

Here's one to say: I am, in fact, a jerk. =D

You're argument is so wierd, I don't kno where to begin. Maybe with, like, there are certain people in this world that would always be considered scummy on those grounds. On that note,

unvote

and throw a true and actual

FOS:serinah

for trying to start an early bandwagon on crap data.

[Varian]

heh, I like how

I'm

the one who over reacted.

By calling him Mr. Brilliance (because, you know, he said he wasn't stupid), when he basically jumped into a conversation he wasn't a part of and acted like a jerk.

I didn't explode, I was amused that someone could so easily find something not even directed in their vicinity as offensive.

And since when is placing the 3rd vote when it takes

7

so horrible? If he placed the 6th, ok. But the 3rd? I'd say you guys are the ones trying to build a bandwagon out of air.

[Rosso Carne]

with all due respect, it is page 2.

And yes you overreacted. I'm a part of this conversation based on the fact that I'm a part of this game. If you can't take random voting without exploding, whats the point of it.

[Erotomachia]

I'd say Rosso Carne over-reacted more than Varian did.

Your comment about Wikipedia came out of nowhere, and there was no smiley to indicate it was a joke.

Although I certainly won't vote against you for it. That'd be making a mountain out of a molehill.

[Varian]

with all due respect, it is page 2.

And yes you overreacted. I'm a part of this conversation based on the fact that I'm a part of this game. If you can't take random voting without exploding, whats the point of it.

That is the most retarded thing i've ever heard.

That's like saying little children should be involved in all discussions their parents have, because hey, they're part of the family.

Two people had made comments about the word maverick, you were not one of them. Why on earth would my comment be directed, in any way, at you?

I still find it funny; this is one of the most amusing start-games i've been a part of.

Oh, and I like how you called it "random voting", except, it was after you had cast a random vote... and you attached a reason to it... me thinks that makes it defy the definition of random.

Do we need another vocabulary lesson? This time it

can

be directed at you.

[TBuG]

Rosso Carne, you are at fault here. Varian was not saying "Oh, you must all be incredibly stupid not to know what maverick means", but that was what you took from his post. You were clearly not random voting, and to say it was is clearly trying to avert suspicion.

Unvote; Vote: Rosso Carne

[serinah80]

I don't see how did I start bandwagoning. I gave a third vote. Not a really important vote. I think I will not be taking sides until the second day unless someone says something really inciminating.

I don't think we can lynch Rosso for being rude. BTW I think that if we obtain problems of an emotional nature like this, we won't be very effective finding the bad guys out.
If Rosso suddenly should get 2 more votes, I'll unvote. But I don't think it's likely.

[Maverick]

Ok, so note that I didn't mean any emphasis whatsoever on saying something about it being the third vote.

Also, I do find it suspicious that Rosso Carne random voted twice.. and that is based off what Varian said, because I didn't go back and read the double random vote myself. To have two random votes is weird though, I must say. I also find it weird of delibird to add a second vote to serinah right after I did, for the same reason, except he ment emphasis on the third vote thing. I don't quite understand that either. Right now I'd have to say Serinah, Rosso, and Delibird are the only three I have any reason to think twice about, but for now my vote stays where it is.

[serinah80]

Right now I'd have to say Serinah, Rosso, and Delibird are the only three I have any reason to think twice about, but for now my vote stays where it is.

So basically everyone that have mad at least a tiny bit of an impression is under attack?
You do anything at all and already you get "Fos". That's why I don't take the first day seriously...

Also I don't see how two random votes are suspicious. I'm a noob and I like to jump around with voting here and there. Why is it suspicious on the first day if we don't really know anything anyway? All votings are random in their nature anyway.

[B Rob]

The mindless bickering between Varian and Rosso Carne isn't helping.

FOS

both of you.

[TB]

Why isn't it helping? They both are overreacting, which makes it likely that one of them is scum, or they both aren't. If they both aren't it isn't helping, but if one of them is scum...

[Maverick]

How is it making an impressioin to get into an arguement about the meaning of a word, and to throw random votes around?

[ChannelDelibird]

First of all,

unvote: Serinah80

I think you're confusing the word 'impression' with 'argument' here. But anyway, I see the point you're trying to make about the random votes, serinah, but really after you've done one it's a bit pointless and needlessly confusing to do a second. I would normally interpret it as a way to mask not wanting to lynch the person you originally random voted for.

But I agree with B Rob - it's not helping because it's not about anything remotely important. The only way we'll get useful information about behaviour is if it's in reaction to something actually related to the game.

[Maverick]

Alright,

Unvote: Serinah80, Vote:ChannelDelibird

You keep coming in and agreeing with what everyone else is saying, you don't add anything to discussions that is your own opinion to help us get more information. All you have done is make votes for no reason, and then agree with what other people are saying when you unvote. To me it seems like a desperate attemp to get the finger off of yourself.

I never really found Serinah suspicious, just the fact that there was an arguement about nothing and she voted because of it.

As for Rosso Carne, I don't feel any need to vote him due to two random votes because that is weird but not lynch worthy..

[ChannelDelibird]

Alright,

Unvote: Serinah80, Vote:ChannelDelibird

You keep coming in and agreeing with what everyone else is saying, you don't add anything to discussions that is your own opinion to help us get more information. All you have done is make votes for no reason, and then agree with what other people are saying when you unvote. To me it seems like a desperate attemp to get the finger off of yourself.

I never really found Serinah suspicious, just the fact that there was an arguement about nothing and she voted because of it.

As for Rosso Carne, I don't feel any need to vote him due to two random votes because that is weird but not lynch worthy..

On the contrary, I had a reason to vote for Serinah, but I realised it was a bad one and unvoted. It's also a little difficult to add more into the discussion while there is so little to go on. All we have is a pointless argument about something that has no relevance, and I have already said that I don't feel we can draw anything from that. Also, I don't understand your point about 'a desperate attempt to get the finger off of myself'. As far as I could tell there was nobody pointing the finger of suspicion at me.