In post 361, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I am voting you because of your warped stance on Andrius and this bullshit "confirmed town" argument.
Either he's town, or there's another town protective role in the game, and if so we'll find that out eventually. For the moment, it's logical to assume he's town.
I would almost certainly call Scum Doctor a "protective role".
...is this really the argument you're going with? Scum doctor, in a game with only one scum team, no SK, no third parties, and where we don't have any evidence of even a town vigilante? And no, "scum doctor" isn't a protective role, it's a scum role.
Look, let's make it simple.
Mod, when you said this:
mod wrote:
You know this setup has: at least two investigative roles, at least one protective role, a single mafia team, no third parties, at least one town bulletproof (role PM below), and at least one Townie. All town roles will be roles familiar to an experienced player, though mechanically modified to fit the theme.
Could you clarify that the two investigate roles, the one protective role, the bulletproof, and the townie are all pro-town roles? Thank you.
If anyone quicklynched Andrius, and he flipped town, we'd have a good scum lead the next day.
Yes. You. For deliberately leaving him at lynch -1 after he claimed doc, in a setup where we know there's a doc, without even waiting to see if there's a counterclaim, apparently with the hope that someone would foolishly hammer him, you would be the most obvious scum lead in that hypothetical situation. Probably more so then the person who actually hammered him.
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie