Mini 277 - Webcomic Mafia - Game Over!

VitaminR · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:03 pm

Could you show me a vote with little reasoning, Coron?

Exams now, but I should be able to respond some time later today.

Coron · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:17 am

VitaminR wrote:Well let's see where this leads us.

Unvote: TSAGod

Vote: Thok

VitaminR · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:30 am

That was on Pie's information to get Thok to claim,

which the town collectively decided to do

.

Coron · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:54 am

1) those people could be scum
2) those people could be sheep like you BAAA!! BAAA!
ok, maybe I missed something here, but as far as I can tell pie's "information" was just a little, "he's acting too worried about cult"

Coron · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:55 am

wait... do you mean the cops information...hm... I know I missed something here.

Coron · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:58 am

oh, he did claim to have info, but really didn't say much about what sort of info until after your vote.

VitaminR · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:04 am

Well that's why I asked for clarification when he first came forward with the information which was

before I voted

.

His response:

Pie_is_good wrote: The evidence is not 100% conclusive, but it's pretty incriminating. My knowledge of his actions so far has been consistant with my knowledge of a scum's actions so far, and that's about all I can say on the subject without giving too much away. Also, I have a chance of catching him in a lie if he claims wrong.

At that point in the game, it felt it was enough to follow up with a pressure vote.

Adele · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:57 pm

/baa

it's better than anything I've got

Vote: VitaminR

Coron · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:32 pm

Adele isn't arguing with me? Something must be wrong here.

Pie_is_good · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:54 pm

Here, still finding Stevie more suspicious.

He's changed his vote in posts 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 , and he's made 13 posts (1 of which is just a "I'll be gone" post). Also, his posts have been short and fairly argument-less. That's not to say he's never presented an argument (once, I think), but he's never followed through with one. That's a majority, people.

His bandwagoning is a little too shameless for my tastes. Not taking risks is more scummy, IMHO, then taking risks and getting questionable results.

Fuldu · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:07 pm

We're not going anywhere like this.

unvote: Adele; vote: VitaminR

Coron · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:22 pm

Fuldu wrote:We're not going anywhere like this.

unvote: Adele; vote: VitaminR

baaaaaa! Don't follow me like a sheep.

TSAGod · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 5:13 am

Mod: votecount?

I'm not liking Vitamin R, but I see no reason to vote for him, unless doing so is inevitable or more information arises.

VitaminR · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:30 am

Coron wrote:
Fuldu wrote:We're not going anywhere like this.

unvote: Adele; vote: VitaminR
baaaaaa! Don't follow me like a sheep.

The irony is beautiful. You're pushing me for low content votes (which you still haven't provided adequate examples of) and the support you're getting is equally low content (worse actually).

I don't see what there is against me. Yes, I've used my vote, but I've always provided clear reasoning and I haven't bandwagoned excessively.

Coron (or any of the people on the bandwagon), I'm not sure why you find me scummier than Stevie, Adele, TSA or any of the people shamelessly jumping on a deadline rush.

TSA, I have 4 votes.

Honestly, I am really frustrated with this game. Participation is at a low and now I am slowly being run up for the deadline over nothing substantial. Run up in such a way that, with this participation, I'll still be strung up if I claim.

I've attempted to find scum and I think there are good lynches in Stevie and TSA, but that's all I can do.

Btw, did anyone else notice Fuldu build a case against me earlier yet join this wagon purely on deadline rush? He's distancing himself already. I haven't seen him come back on his strong earlier suspicions of me anywhere.

VitaminR · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:32 am

Coron wrote: 2) those people could be sheep like you BAAA!! BAAA!

I found this insulting, btw. Where have I done anything to warrant this?

Coron · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:59 am

You followed someone who claimed to have "inconclusive evidence from their role", without even making them claim it.

Very sheeplike.

VitaminR · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:25 am

Claiming it would have invalidated Thok's claim. It was obvious from the way he presented it Thok needed to claim first.

He came forward unpressured asking the town to trust him. I did. That's not sheep-like. I considered what I knew and decided to trust him.

Sheep-like is following without asking questions and without giving it thought.

Coron · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:28 am

How do I know if you think if you don't post anything about it in the thread.

VitaminR · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:32 am

Perhaps I should have outlined that in the thread, but I think it's obvious from the questions I asked first that I gave it some thought before following. Generally though, I think you can assume people think before posting.

Coron · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:39 am

Then how do you catch scum for sheeping(which is very easy and good for them).

That's stupid.

VitaminR · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:41 am

By looking at the reasoning they give?

VitaminR · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:43 am

EBWODP: When called upon it, obviously. Do you seriously expect people to outline all their thought processes?

VitaminR · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:46 am

Anyway, how does that even matter? It should be clear I gave it thought and I gave my reasoning. Why am I a sheep?

Sorry for the triple post.

Coron · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:00 am

VitaminR wrote:EBWODP: When called upon it, obviously. Do you seriously expect people to outline all their thought processes?

at least some would be nice.

Coron · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:04 am

VitaminR wrote:Could you expand on that a little bit? More precisely, how solid is this evidence?

VitaminR wrote:Well let's see where this leads us.

Unvote: TSAGod

Vote: Thok

when they said cirumstantial after the first(well, what would have been worse than that) you vote anyway, saying only, let's see where this goes. Seems a lot like sheeping with a bit of cover up.