Toy Story Mafia (Day 9)

Scott Brosius · Post Post #2175 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:25 pm

Chill, I'm back. Will prod whoever. kunkstar and Ray have 48 hours from this post to respond or else modkilled.

Scott Brosius · Post Post #2176 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:29 pm

Vote Count 4-3

bobsnox

(5)- NanookTheWolf, petroleumjelly, jmurph3, farside22, RandomActs,

Blonde Doctor

(0)-

diddin

(0)-

farside22

(0)-

Flavour Analysis

(0)-

jmurph3

(0)-

Juls

(0)-

kunkstar7

(0)-

NanookTheWolf

(0)-

PeregrineV

(0)-

petroleumjelly

(0)-

Rainbowdash

(0)-

RandomActs

(0)-

Ray Montano

(0)-

SpyreX

(0)-

Not Voting

(10)- bobsnox, Blonde Doctor, diddin, Flavour Analysis, Juls, kunkstar7, PeregrineV, Ray Montano, SpyreX, Rainbowdash,

With 15 alive, it's 8 to a lynch.

Deadline is Sept. 28th at 1pm EST.

Prodding: Nanook. Blonde Doctor, kunkstar, Ray

[/b]

PeregrineV · Post Post #2177 (ISO) » Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:39 pm

In post 2152, Flavour Analysis wrote:Farside: I've been busy. (Started school)

I docced Murph.

Just now saw this. Can you give your explanation/reason behind your selection?

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #2178 (ISO) » Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:31 pm

Posting to avoid modkill .. I'm still here just waiting on the rest to weigh in.

farside22 · Post Post #2179 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:21 am

In post 2177, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 2152, Flavour Analysis wrote:Farside: I've been busy. (Started school)

I docced Murph.

Just now saw this. Can you give your explanation/reason behind your selection?

Does it matter?

RandomActs · Post Post #2180 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:20 am

Yes, it matters. I'd like an answer, also.

jmurph3 · Post Post #2181 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:54 am

I didn't think FA's reasoning was necessarily the best, but I'll let them explain.

kunkstar7 · Post Post #2182 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:30 am

VT here. I'll eat the vig tonight as the 1v1 is favorable for the town, just make sure you don't let RA get away with it in the morning.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #2183 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:33 am

Kunkstar - What is your character name?

kunkstar7 · Post Post #2184 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:15 am

I'm Ken.

PeregrineV · Post Post #2185 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:32 am

In post 2179, farside22 wrote:
In post 2177, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 2152, Flavour Analysis wrote:Farside: I've been busy. (Started school)

I docced Murph.

Just now saw this. Can you give your explanation/reason behind your selection?

Does it matter?

Sure it does. Why not protect a vig neighbor, for example?

And how is the "town JOAT" not being killed, yet VTs are dropping like flies?

RandomActs · Post Post #2186 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:38 am

kunkstar7 wrote:VT here. I'll eat the vig tonight as the 1v1 is favorable for the town, just make sure you don't let RA get away with it in the morning.

You got it backwards. Chances are I won't be here in the morning, and you'll be the one-for-one scum I ID'ed.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #2187 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:23 am

Ken definitely could be scum, add that to the earlier result of Chkflip, seems to go together hand in hand.

RandomActs · Post Post #2188 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:02 am

And how is the "town JOAT" not being killed, yet VTs are dropping like flies?

Noted as well. The JOAT claim is wearing thin. Could be scum or SK laying low.

jmurph3 · Post Post #2189 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:19 am

FA is Woody. There is no doubt about that. As I've said before, I cannot guarantee that they are town JOAT, but they are not lying about their character or else it would be impossible for me to neighborize them as I have, and I see no reason for a confirmed Woody to lie about being town JOAT. Bobs, on the other hand, has every reason to lie, and thus needs to die (incidental rhyming there). Kunkstar also needs to eat bullets tonight, and will confirm RandomActs one way or the other on the cop claim, while I confirm on the Jessie claim.

jmurph3 · Post Post #2190 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:20 am

Also, @Peregrine: I don't know 100% if this was FA's reasoning for not doccing a vig neighbor, but we discussed during the night the possibility of there being scum among the neighbors, and we both seemed to find it rather likely.

diddin · Post Post #2191 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:24 am

FUCKING PEOPLE NEED TO POST THIS IS WHY POPCORN CLAIMING SUCKS ETC ETC ETC

Flavour Analysis · Post Post #2192 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:26 am

I docced Murph because she's mod confirmed Bullzeye. Pretty town to me.

Flavour Analysis · Post Post #2193 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:26 am

*Mod confirmed to me when she used her action on me.

Flavour Analysis · Post Post #2194 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:27 am

I believe the CHkflip guilty. He can go die.

RandomActs · Post Post #2195 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:33 am

Flavour Analysis wrote:I docced Murph because she's mod confirmed Bullzeye. Pretty town to me.

Did you think she was seriously threatened for a night-kill? Why not investigate someone scummy instead?

farside22 · Post Post #2196 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:53 pm

RandomActs wrote:
Flavour Analysis wrote:I docced Murph because she's mod confirmed Bullzeye. Pretty town to me.

Did you think she was seriously threatened for a night-kill? Why not investigate someone scummy instead?

and this is my issue as well

RandomActs · Post Post #2197 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:48 pm

unvote

Only because a possible mod-kill may bring us too close to the lynch threshhold.

Juls · Post Post #2198 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:49 pm

Why do people even waste their time playing this game if all they want to do is lurk? I seriously loath lurkers.

jmurph3 · Post Post #2199 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:58 pm

@Juls - it's ok, it looks like we may have some mod death coming really soon. Which should help this game pick up nicely.