redFF wrote:uncledaphne wrote:I wasnt trying to defend you Sorg. I was attacking Vifam for his attempted quicklynch. You are giving off minor scum tells, but your on my OK radar for now
no it was a chainsaw defense...
Define chainsaw defense
uncledaphne wrote:Ok Im done for. Good job Vifam for getting everyone around your little finger. Horrible jobe everyone who isnt with Vifam on the mafia. Im disappointed in you guys
redFF wrote:....you getting votes is ALWAYS your fault, no exception. You got votes because you look scummy. If you are town you failed because you failed to establish your townieness sufficiently and if you are scum you failed because you got found out. If there are votes on you then you are the problem not town.
trekker wrote:If daphne is town we need to pay attention to sorgster and redFF tomorrow.
uncledaphne wrote:Vifam wrote:uncledaphne wrote:paraffin wrote:panda picture guy, i think vifam just likes pressing people so that we can actually get something useful done. If the atmosphere is such that nobody is really afraid of real suspicion then the scum can get through pretty easily, so that makes him pro-town in my book. If someone gets L-1 or L-2, then we can say hold up guys let's slow down a bit we still have a whole three weeks to get through. But if we wait to create any pressure at all before then we will surely lose.
Yeah but Vifam pressed too hard for too little a reason, and then was sure the sonic picture man was scum
How did I push too hard? Sorg is still alive and kickin'.
Once again, I was never "sure" he was scum, do you really think I would be 100% on my scumreads on page two?
Im reading you as noobie mafia. You wanted to quick lynch sorg but it didnt work so you tried to make everyone think that it was a random meaningless vote. Uprising please explain to me how my placeholder is pro scum.
eep wrote:I'm not uprising, but unless I missed something, you had a vote on Vifam, who you have consistently found suspicious, and then switched to a "placeholder" vote on someone you think is town? That does not make any sense.
redFF wrote:....you getting votes is ALWAYS your fault, no exception. You got votes because you look scummy. If you are town you failed because you failed to establish your townieness sufficiently and if you are scum you failed because you got found out. If there are votes on you then you are the problem not town.
implosion wrote:
Vote Count 1.1
AntB - 1(sorgster)
Vifam - 2 (David Xanatos, uncledaphne)
redFF - 0
Nunez - 0
David Xanatos
Uprising - 1 (TheRainMan)
Mysterio - 0
sorgster - 1 (TheAwesomeAll)
StevieT92
TheRainMan
Daybid
NihilisticNinja
TheAwesomeAll
Stinger Bell
uncledaphne - 8 (Stringer Bell, redFF, paraffin, Vifam, eep, trekker, redFF, Mysterio) (L-2)
Gaylord Focker - 1 (Daybid)
paraffin
eep - 1 (Gaylord Focker)
trekker - 1(sorgster)
With 19 alive, 10 votes are required to lynch.
If youevernotice a mistake that I've made with the votecount (or elsewhere) don't hesitate to tell me.