Brightest Day Mafia, Part 1 - GAME OVER

[Andrius]

BLACKOUTS AND 100 DEGREE WEATHER.
TROLOLOLOLOL

[ToastyToast]

BLACKOUTS AND 100 DEGREE WEATHER.
TROLOLOLOLOL

Dude I even had to pee in the dark

[Andrius]

TROLOLOLOL
AT LEAST YOU DONT HAVE TO SIT DOWN
PICK A BUSH
YOU'RE AT THE BEACH
OR A SANDPLACE

[Andrius]

just realized i've been all-caps'ing.

mae culpa. its funny how i don't realize im doing it at the time.

>_>

[tanstalas]

Yeah, what Andy said, hopefully we have a watcher who can watch one of us 3, or a tracker who can track someone else who is scummy, etc etc.

Meh, you all know how to play

[vezokpiraka]

unvote
vote GW

Yeah I'm hammering. I don't think anyone needed anything else to say.

[Blackberry]

uhhhhhhhhh

I wanted a claim first -_-'

[zMuffinMan]

That wasn't a hammer, that's L-1.

[Oversoul]

That was a lynch, Muffin. I agree with Blackberry. A claim tells us just as much as their actual role.

[WeyounsLastClone]

So if we go
ToastyToast: OverToast
tans: WLC
Andrius: PeregrineV
Do you three find that acceptable?

Except you're not supposed to do it like that, Nik.
You give us a LIST.
We target from the list.
The THREAT of being targeted will work almost as well as a true target.

tans def. targets WLC. If he doesn't someone should.

Do you think people can't think for themselves?

[PeregrineV]

It's the notes. It's fluff, and half of them are wrong anyway.
AND I've already said that the masons are not actually masons. We're just all very, very likely to be town.

Ahh, that does change things. So the fab 5 are just fab town, but not confirmed masons. That's much better, because I was having a hard time squeezing all of the scum and CR into three people using PoE.

And they were notes for me when I read, so as to how much to weigh each post. And I'm glad I did, since you were able to clear up misconceptions.

[hiplop]

T_T im here, have CATCHING UP to do

[Andrius]

So if we go
ToastyToast: OverToast
tans: WLC
Andrius: PeregrineV
Do you three find that acceptable?

Except you're not supposed to do it like that, Nik.
You give us a LIST.
We target from the list.
The THREAT of being targeted will work almost as well as a true target.

tans def. targets WLC. If he doesn't someone should.

Do you think people can't think for themselves?

They can.
Hence we don't need "you do this" when a list will do.

Hammerdrop by vezok thank god.

See you all tomorrow.

[ToastyToast]

@WLC: Thats why we gave our "3 most suspicious lists." We're all okay with it. We are thinking for ourselves.

[Kast]

Muffin is right again. Unless Andy has two votes, GW still has a chance to claim. Anyone hammering before the claim and before tans confirms who Toast and Andy should target (or at least confirms the "list") is doing a huge disservice to the town.

Also, to Andy's point, a 3-man list without any explicit coordination in targeting and still expecting Toast, Andy, and Tans to

not

double target is somewhat implausible.

Was proposed already, but Tans should def not nail down his target to just WLC or just any one player; he should pick from a list of players that he can think for himself and determine, while at the same time assigning Toast/Andy to pick from a public, non-overlapping list of players (can be list of 1), guaranteeing that there is no overlap as only Tans would have to pick carefully, while Andy and Toast would be picking from mutually exclusive lists. This completely avoids all the disadvantages of a "you target A, you target B" plan, while guaranteeing no overlap, and still doesn't reveal to scum who exactly is targeted. It also locks in Andy and Toast against future potential lies as scum about their night actions.

[Nikanor]

You realize that there are only nine potential blocking candidates, yes?
- Kast
- Candle Jack
- WeyounsLastClone
- Blackberry
- Mr. Subliminal
- vezokpiraka
- PeregrineV
- inHimshalibe
- Oversoul

If we divide this into three it's going to be pretty obvious as to who each person will block anyway, so I don't see the benefit to your plan.
Also, if we tell the blockers who to block, it completely locks in their night action. Your plan leaves open the option for them to claim to block a scumbuddy while actually not blocking anyone.

[Andrius]

I don't have two votes.

WLC should most def be targeted.

[Candle Jack]

Is GW hammered? Andrius was already on the wagon I thought.

Not to late for a PereV lynch here guys.

preview: so maybe not?

[Andrius]

I was already on the wagon.
I thought vezok hammered.

[Andrius]

And Nik's list includes plenty of obvtown. Drop CJ, BB, inHim.
Better list.

[Andrius]

Ghostwriter (8) -

Nikanor, Mr. Subliminal, zMuffinMan, Friend, Andrius, PeregrineV, inHimshallibe, tanstalas

vezokpiraka (2) -

hiplop, WeyounsLastClone

WeyounsLastClone (1) -

nopointinactingup

PeregrineV (1) -

Candle Jack

Not Voting (6) -

Kast, Blackberry, GhostWriter, ToastyToast, vezokpiraka, Oversoul


With 18 alive, it takes 10 to lynch and 9 to no lynch.
[/b]

vezok hammered.

[Andrius]

Oh nevermind its ten to lynch my bad.
He's now at L-1.

[zMuffinMan]

I don't think it really matters if you claim your target or not. Ideally, if GW isn't CR, we're trying to block the CR. Scum NKs aren't as important to block and at least you can co-ordinate so you don't double up by claiming targets. PS: I also have an ability that has potential to work as a roleblock.

And yeah, he's still at L-1. Andrius was already on the GW wagon when it was L-2 and vezok is the only one that's voted since then.

unvote

Don't want the hammer yet. I still want to catch up and read a few things before this goes into night. Also chance to possibly co-ordinate is always good.

pedit: as above

[Candle Jack]

Yeah, claiming your targets isn't a good idea. We basically want the cult recruit to fail sometimes, otherwise they're slowly going to grow out of control, and claiming who we're going to target lets them maneuver around some of the power roles out there.

The less claiming, the better actually.

[zMuffinMan]

So, the more roleblocking going on, the better, right? Toast claimed Jailer, Andrius and tans implied they have a roleblocking ability, as did I. That's 4 roleblocks. Unless CR is action-immune, or at least one of us four is lying/gambiting/whatever, I don't see how co-ordinating these actions is a bad thing.