Double-Dip Mafia, Game Over

[DrippingGoofball]

On reason why I'm so sure about my reads is that

I've been at L-1 FOREVER

now.

And I'm

STILL

not hammered.

That's how I know who the town is. And 100% of the scum is on my wagon, right this minute.

[imaginality]

Quick post. More later, but this needs correcting:

Imag accuses DGB of hammering Kunk without a claim... even tho Kunk did the same D1?

Hiraki claimed VT.

When kunkstar7

did

hammer without claim, on WLC, I was one of the people to call him on it even before WLC flipped, and then got him lynched for it the next day. (I've been

trying

to do the same with DGB whose hammer-before-claim was also bad... )

Notice how DGB leapt on your error to use it against me rather than point out you were wrong...

[DrippingGoofball]

Notice how DGB leapt on your error to use it against me rather than point out you were wrong...

See, that's why you and Empking are scumzors. You never, ever, for an instant, give me the benefit of the doubt. It's just a completely thoughtless knee-jerk reflex.

[DrippingGoofball]

I was one of the people to call him on it even before WLC flipped, and then got him lynched for it the next day. (I've been

trying

to do the same with DGB whose hammer-before-claim was also bad... )

I love how you head town cred on yourself for bus'ing your buddy, but I'm scum for hammering him.

[DrippingGoofball]

EBWOP

I was one of the people to call him on it even before WLC flipped, and then got him lynched for it the next day. (I've been

trying

to do the same with DGB whose hammer-before-claim was also bad... )

I love how you

heap

town cred on yourself for bus'ing your buddy, but I'm scum for hammering him.

[DrippingGoofball]

And the two of you are hanging your hats on teeny-tiny technicalities, you never pay heed to the big picture.

That's because of your scum wincon.

I'm looking forward to reading your scum QT, just to find out which numb-skull decided to let me live to be the easy lynch.

[Empking]

So its acceptable to lie if it contributes to the made-up vision you're trying to sell?

[Amrun]

Imaginality, show me how you pushed for a kunkstar lynch.

I'm not asking because I'm lazy. I want to see what you will say.

P-edit: Seriously, empking?

[Empking]

P-edit: Seriously, empking?

Yes. Its infeasable for DGB with her scumputer analysis and her ISOing of me not to realize that I voted Kunk. Her justification seems to be an appeal to her "bigger picture".

[DrippingGoofball]

So its acceptable to lie if it contributes to the made-up vision you're trying to sell?

I'm not even going to answer that.

Your last fake scum-hunting effort in this game dates back 1992.

You're not really reacting to the changing winds of the game. You're just following the plan you cooked up in the scum QT last night, even though it long stopped making sense.

But as always, I

am

wrong with one of my suspects.

If I'm wrong about you - though I think you are the most likely one to pan out - stop being so stubborn, you know what to do. Help us lynch scum. That would

not

be me.

[DrippingGoofball]

Its infeasable for DGB with her scumputer analysis and her ISOing of me not to realize that I voted Kunk.

Do you seriously think that with all the information I spout out trying to piece things together, that I wouldn't get something wrong, mix some things up, and have a couple of brain farts?

I think you and your buddy are desperately hoping to convince a townie to hammer me. Do you have daytalk? If so, I can't wait to read it.

[Amrun]

I would rather no lynch than lynch dgb.

[Empking]

DGB: What was the plan?

[Crazy]

MY BODY ITCHING LIKE CRAZY RIGHT NOW OMG!!!!

I don't want a No Lynch, and it looks like the Quilford wagon doesn't have enough support. That sucks.

UNVOTE: Quilford
VOTE: imaginality
VOTE: Empking

I have issues with both imag/Empking wagons; imag's recent posts read close to obv-town, despite his earlier scummier play, and Empking doesn't seem like a likely partner to Quilford, who is my top scum read.

But a No Lynch is HORRIBLE when we're at odd numbers. Anything is preferable to a No Lynch. Heck, if there's no majority by deadline, I'll even hammer DGB before we No Lynch.

[petroleumjelly]

Day Four Vote Count #13

4 DrippingGoofball (imaginality, Empking, smallpeoples343, Tarhalindur)
4 Empking (DrippingGoofball, Quilford, Amrun, Crazy)
3 imaginality (DrippingGoofball, Amrun, Crazy)
3 smallpeoples343 (Ranmaru, imaginality, Quilford)
1 Amrun (Tarhalindur)
1 Crazy (Ranmaru)
1 Quilford (Empking)
1 Ranmaru (smallpeoples343)

With

9

alive, it takes

5

to lynch. Deadline is

August 6 at 5:00 PM PDT

currently suspended.

Not Voting – 0 – Nobody

Mod Note

: Apologies for the sparse vote counts, I am currently on V/LA. Still looking for a replacement for smallpeoples343. Because of the missing player, the deadline is currently

suspended

.

[Empking]

Crazy: You know how Quilford and DGB are pretty obviously buddies (the metaphorical FOS doesn't really work when you've got two votes). What does that make you think about DGB?

[DrippingGoofball]

Empking,

This is what makes you scum.

I am town. I made a million calculations, plus a few brain farts, to narrow down the field to three players. Yet I keep second-guessing myself. What if I'm wrong about Empking, even though he's my #1 suspect? What if imaginality is town? What if there is a scum in my third pick, Tarhalindur? What, gowd forbid, is there is scum in my long shots?

But you. You are scum. You have never deviated one iota from today's agenda. Was it to frame me for hammering kunkstar? Did it help that I had narrowly escaped death a day before, and that players would be keen on sending me to the gallows? Are you limited in changes of heart that you could credibly make?

Why haven't you considered today that Tarhalindur may be scum? What about imaginality? Have you taken the time to take a deeper look? You've been on most large wagons, why aren't you joining a second one today? Why have you shown no inclination to look for scum? Why is your activity confined to attacking your attacker with quips and technicalities?

[DrippingGoofball]

Crazy: You know how Quilford and DGB are pretty obviously buddies (the metaphorical FOS doesn't really work when you've got two votes). What does that make you think about DGB?

All you need is to convince ONE TOWNIE, Empking.

How am I Quilford's buddy, and not WLC, whom I defended, or Crazy, whom I similarly defended? Or smalls, for that matter? Or Amrun?

You're just trying to manipulate Crazy because he didn't get a Quilford wagon. That's what makes me a Quilford buddy.

DIE SCUM

[DrippingGoofball]

NVM, Empking is voting Quilford.

[Amrun]

Aw I did forget we were at odd numbers.

Empking, stop. Dgb is town and everyone knows it (or should) kthxbye

Tar, imag, emp: whichever one of you three is town unvote NOW

[Empking]

Aw I did forget we were at odd numbers.

Empking, stop. Dgb is town and everyone knows it (or should) kthxbye

So faking a "lynch me! lynch me!" is town?
Lying is town?
If we're charitable, a complete disinterest in facts if it promotes the crazy conspiracy is town? If we're uncharitable (though probably more honest), a trick to get a player lynched by using a "you can't unring a bell" trick is town?
Being Quilford's scumbuddy is town? (This bit I really can't understand your opinion of the matter. Quilford's scumbuddy being scum is pretty much a truism.)

[Amrun]

Every single one of those leading questions is crap. U scumz

[Empking]

How?

[DrippingGoofball]

How?

If Quilford and I are town, who is scum?

[Amrun]

You're looking for me to say, "Lying is bad" and things like that. You're commiting the logical fallacy of begging the question; by answering either way, I admit that DGB was lying, which you can then use to point fingers at us both since it is widely agreed upon that lying is bad. In fact, dgb never lied so I disagree with the premise of that question and each of the others as well.

You're searching for categorical flaws in dgb's posts rather than probing intent.

That is what scum do.