Mini 277 - Webcomic Mafia - Game Over!
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Nemesis Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Posts: 492
- Joined: December 15, 2005
-
-
Pie_is_good Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: December 21, 2003
- Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh
-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
-
-
Adele Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: October 13, 2005
- Location: Not in any Large games, that's for darn sure!
I'm personally waiting on, like, a single comment on the plan I suggested (post 246, I think). Wouldn't this give us the benefits of Nemesis' info without the downsides?
I doubt bribery would work - we don't know how much any one of them would need from us, and we can't negotiate. It's likely they believe they have a good chance of getting both WCs and scum win might be their Major WC so they care more about that then anything else.
Besides, even if one did come forward, we couldn't trust him; he'sscum.-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
Well I agree with the second part and I think we should be careful with asking for claim in case Nemesis can clear someone, but I'm not sure about the first part.Adele wrote:I reckon we should bandwagon to see how they react, and if it gets close to lynch and we're bandwagoning an innocent that Nemesis knows of, he steps in before (possibly directly before) that innocent is called upon to claim. To that end,
Vote: TSAGod
Bandwagoning purely to get a reaction doesn't work if you set out to do this, because scum will know that is the intention and will remain calm. Unless there is threat (the lynch) behind the wagon, we can't rely deduce much from the reaction. Which I think is hard to do anyway.
I'd prefer to go on suspicions, even if it is hard to do without an abundance of information.
I think a couple of players need to step up and post more.-
-
Nemesis Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Posts: 492
- Joined: December 15, 2005
Sorry, I thought that was what we were going to do... Assuming of course you don't bandwagon everyone in one day.Adele wrote:I'm personally waiting on, like, a single comment on the plan I suggested (post 246, I think). Wouldn't this give us the benefits of Nemesis' info without the downsides?
I don't think it was suggested that we should bandwagon random people, I'm fairly sure the current bandwagon has some reasoning behind it.Bandwagoning purely to get a reaction doesn't work if you set out to do this, because scum will know that is the intention and will remain calm. Unless there is threat (the lynch) behind the wagon, we can't rely deduce much from the reaction. Which I think is hard to do anyway.
I'd prefer to go on suspicions, even if it is hard to do without an abundance of information.-
-
StevieT92 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 934
- Joined: March 8, 2005
Adele wrote:I reckon we should bandwagon to see how they react, and if it gets close to lynch and we're bandwagoning an innocent that Nemesis knows of, he steps in before (possibly directly before) that innocent is called upon to claim. To that end,
Vote: TSAGodVote: Adele
When you are bandwagonning to get a reaction, you don't go out and claim it. Either this is a bad play, or an attempt to warn your scumbuddies.-
-
Aelyn Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 774
- Joined: November 6, 2004
- Location: Birmingham, UK
-
-
Adele Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: October 13, 2005
- Location: Not in any Large games, that's for darn sure!
Hmm, yeah, that makes sense, if we were bandwagoningStevieT92 wrote:When you are bandwagonning to get a reaction, you don't go out and claim it. Either this is a bad play, or an attempt to warn your scumbuddies.justfor a reaction. But that's neither the only thing nor even the main thing. The point of the bandwagons is to find someone scummy-looking who Nemesis doesn't stick up for. If they make themselves look scummier, that's additional advantage, but I hope we're not just counting on that.-
-
Pie_is_good Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: December 21, 2003
- Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh
-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
-
-
Nemesis Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Posts: 492
- Joined: December 15, 2005
-
-
Pie_is_good Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: December 21, 2003
- Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh
The evidence is not 100% conclusive, but it's pretty incriminating. My knowledge of his actions so far has been consistant with my knowledge of a scum's actions so far, and that's about all I can say on the subject without giving too much away. Also, I have a chance of catching him in a lie if he claims wrong.VitaminR wrote:Could you expand on that a little bit? More precisely, how solid is this evidence?
Reason - because we have 9 alive and 3 or 4 scum left, meaning someone's going to need to change something or else we are going to lose.Nemesis wrote:Any particular reason for the semi claim which will undoubtedly become a full or near full claim? Surely if you had waited for a claim from Thok you could wouldn't have tipped him off first...
Waiting - If you'll notice, I have bandwagoned/voted Thok a few times in the past. In the above post, I said the minimum I could possibly say that I thought would induce a claim.I am a stand-up dude of genuine flyness.-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
-
-
Aelyn Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 774
- Joined: November 6, 2004
- Location: Birmingham, UK
The familiar caption shifts into votecount mode.
I'm still looking for a replacement for Tyfo.The Author, in a caption, wrote:Pie_is_Good - 1 (Fuldu)
TSAGod - 2 (Adele, Thok)
Adele - 1 (StevieT92)
Thok - 2 (Pie_is_Good, VitaminR)
And I need to get Thok's name out of my headLast edited by Aelyn on Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.-
-
Fuldu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: January 26, 2004
Because given the potential numbers he's talking about:VitaminR wrote:People? So far it's just me. And yes, pretty much. Why would he be lying?
...a one-for-one tradeoff with the town player dying first would probably be pretty good for scum right now. Now, I don't think the numbers are quite as drastic as what he's describing, but I'm not going to vote without a bit more information. I'm not averse to the idea of Thok claiming, but I think he should do it without vote pressure, because it isn't clear that vote pressure is safe right now.Pie_is_good wrote:Reason - because we have 9 alive and 3 or 4 scum left, meaning someone's going to need to change something or else we are going to lose.It takes a village to raise a lynch mob.-
-
Pie_is_good Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: December 21, 2003
- Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh
The 'Reason' that I gave above was the reasoning behind me deciding to play a little risky, not neccesarily reasoning behind why you should believe me. It was responding to the people asking why I decided to semiclaim.Fuldu wrote:
...a one-for-one tradeoff with the town player dying first would probably be pretty good for scum right now. Now, I don't think the numbers are quite as drastic as what he's describing, but I'm not going to vote without a bit more information. I'm not averse to the idea of Thok claiming, but I think he should do it without vote pressure, because it isn't clear that vote pressure is safe right now.Pie_is_good wrote:Reason - because we have 9 alive and 3 or 4 scum left, meaning someone's going to need to change something or else we are going to lose.
I'd be okay with Thok claiming under no vote pressure, but I haven't heard him agree to claim at all yet.
Until then...
PieI am a stand-up dude of genuine flyness.-
-
Fuldu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: January 26, 2004
-
-
Aelyn Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 774
- Joined: November 6, 2004
- Location: Birmingham, UK
-
-
Adele Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: October 13, 2005
- Location: Not in any Large games, that's for darn sure!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.