Double-Dip Mafia, Game Over

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1375 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:13 am

If you somehow manage to finagle to have me lynched instead of yourself... GG scum. You're a feisty one.

Amrun · Post Post #1376 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:19 am

Mmm, dgb's kunkstarimaginalitybuddies case. Mama likey.

Unvote smalls, Vote: Imaginality

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1377 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:48 am

Don't delay, folks, we have to keep it moving!

Ranmaru · Post Post #1378 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:01 am

Hey Quil.

You never did explain how my tone was different here than Chkflip's game.

TELL ME NOW. OR I VOTE U.

Ranmaru · Post Post #1379 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:04 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:I just iso'd Empking.

How does anlyone get a TOWN read on this? He's purposely opaque. He says nothing.

When I attack him, I get short quips back. That's town?

He's on nearly every wagon.

He was never a town read. I have lost to lynching Empking in lylo. I'm just scared of reading him wrong.

I do see that he has voted me every chance he could get tho. I could go for an Emp lynch.

Ranmaru · Post Post #1380 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:11 am

Btw I'm reading stuff because I want to make the right decision.

imaginality · Post Post #1381 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:18 am

I find it interesting that DGB waited until now to swamp the game with content, including suggesting others make a whole bunch of new cases too just days before deadline. As Ranmaru said,

why only now, DGB? Why not before?

Oh, right. Because your neck's on the line and you know more appeals to emotion and fake reactions to being hammered wouldn't be enough to save you this time round, so you're trying to make youself look useful.

Crazy · Post Post #1382 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:21 am

@Quilford - How do you feel about the imaginality wagon?
And can you explain your Empking vote and your Tar vote?
And can you explain why you said you doubted your read on several players (including Empking), but then in the same post, you said "Empking needs to die."

@Tar - Why is one instance of Quilford saying he doubted his reads enough to jump off his wagon?

@imaginality - Any chance of you voting Quilford today? I'm not lynching DGB.

Crazy · Post Post #1383 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:31 am

My current stance is that I want to lynch Quilford. He's lazy, not even remotely proactive, and whining about getting Empking lynched even though he's never even made a case on Empking, and despite even saying that he wasn't sure about his read on Empking!

He also apparently thinks that HackerHuck getting replaced is a scum-tell, and when I called him out on his craplogic, he ignored me.

When it comes to relations towards Kunkstar, he is also one of the worst, along with Imaginality and Amrun.

If you guys don't want to lynch Quilford, I will support an imaginality lynch, since even if Imag is town, he'll just end up supporting the scum in getting their mislynches, anyway. But I'd rather lynch the more likely scum first.

imaginality · Post Post #1384 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:32 am

@Crazy: nope. Well, obviously I'd vote him if it came down to that or no-lynch. But not otherwise.

How about smallpeoples343, any chance of you voting him? You had him at 4th on your scumlist, didn't you? I'm willing to shift my second vote to smalls now, considering its now clearer you're not going to get lynched today.

Unvote: Crazy; Vote: smallpeoples343

Would far far prefer someone just hammering DGB though.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1385 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:37 am

We can lynch Empking & imaginality. ONE is scum, if not both. If it turns out that one is town, as a last resort, I would have a Quilford lynch.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1386 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:37 am

imaginality wrote:
Unvote: Crazy; Vote: smallpeoples343

Pfffffffffffffffffffft

Easy target, he's not scum, and he won't show up for the claim, he's being replaced.

imaginality · Post Post #1387 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:38 am

He's already claimed.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1388 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:39 am

imaginality wrote:I find it interesting that DGB waited until now to swamp the game with content, including suggesting others make a whole bunch of new cases too just days before deadline. As Ranmaru said,
why only now, DGB? Why not before?

It takes a lot of time and effort to fine-tune reads, scum, but you don't have to do that. You can just stay consistent and follow your scum agenda.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1389 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:39 am

imaginality wrote:He's already claimed.

Can he defend himself?

imaginality · Post Post #1390 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:42 am

He's had plenty of time to do that and (in my opinion) hasn't succeeded. It's not like I'm basing this on a new case out of nowhere. Everyone (including him) has had a chance to consider and discuss the arguments for/against him.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1391 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:43 am

Bus your buddy Empking, time is runing out

imaginality · Post Post #1392 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:44 am

Also, nice shifting of the goalposts from "he's not here to claim" to "he's not here to defend himself".

You forgetting he's claimed seems like a scumslip to be honest. You don't need to keep track of what people are doing, you know who the town are.

imaginality · Post Post #1393 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:45 am

DGB wrote:Bus your buddy Empking, time is runing out

Talking to yourself, DGB? First sign of madness, that.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1394 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:46 am

imaginality wrote:You forgetting he's claimed seems like a scumslip to be honest.

Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft

That's the sort of thing scum keeps track of, not to waste NKs on vanilla townies.

Come on. Bus Empking. You'll get a lot of town cred, fo sho.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1395 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:30 pm

Deadline is August 6, 5PM, PDT.

I will be on an airplane on that day, leaving at dawn.

Tomorrow is my last day here before night.

@PJ - my activity will be slow tomorrow game day, do not replace, I will be back unless NK'd.

Tarhalindur · Post Post #1396 (ISO) » Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:31 pm

Crazy wrote:@Quilford - How do you feel about the imaginality wagon?
And can you explain your Empking vote and your Tar vote?
And can you explain why you said you doubted your read on several players (including Empking), but then in the same post, you said "Empking needs to die."

@Tar - Why is one instance of Quilford saying he doubted his reads enough to jump off his wagon?

@imaginality - Any chance of you voting Quilford today? I'm not lynching DGB.

Read like a town response to me.

Not as sold as I was by imaginality's posting today, however.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1397 (ISO) » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:15 am

Tar, please vote scum... I worked hard and I really want to see a scum flip before I leave for magnificent Utah.

imaginality · Post Post #1398 (ISO) » Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:31 am

I'm going to be offline for much of the next 24 hours, but I'll definitely be back well before deadline (which is about 33.5 hours from now, if I'm converting the time difference correctly?).

In the meantime, I don't think there's any point in me saying much more about DGB. Everyone should be capable of drawing their own concDGBISSCUMclusions about her (and me) from what's already been said.

About smalls, I'll just say that his flaking is null. We should judge him with regards to his previous scumminess, and his needing replacement shouldn't be used as a reason against lynching him.

Amrun · Post Post #1399 (ISO) » Fri Aug 05, 2011 5:38 am

Omg imaginality is scum.

I thought he had a decent chance but now he really is.

Every post of his on this page is terrible.

Dgb is towntowntown.

Crazy, you're going to have to explain your relational tells to kunkstar because I felt a little bit like I was high when reading your post about it.