Meh, I plan to link to PYP every time someone insists that we can't lynch scummy people because of random bullshit, but we should lynch people who were a hell of a lot more townie instead.
Both Hoopla and Faraday were amazingly obvious scum by end of day 1.
Repeat popular opinions
"Not ballsy enough" argument is FUCKING BULLSHIT because that's NOT THE REASON HE WAS VOTING HER IN THE FIRST PLACE
"SSBF is on crack" WHEEE CALLING A VI "ON CRACK" TELL ME SOMETHING NEW FARADAY
"Oh ya Spy there's scum in your list" LOOK AT THAT FARABUDDY
LOOK
AT
THAT
FARA
BUDDY
YOU KILL IT WITH FIRE RIGHT FUCKING NOW OR SO HELP ME GOD
GreyICE wrote:Meh, I plan to link to PYP every time someone insists that we can't lynch scummy people because of random bullshit, but we should lynch people who were a hell of a lot more townie instead.
Both Hoopla and Faraday were amazingly obvious scum by end of day 1.
this is an amusing post. i hope you're not talking about yourself as one of those that looked town though.
are you thinking of me when you're with somebody else?
Hi everyone! thanks for playing. The result led to a multiple-way tie with no team winning all four games, so this requires the moderators make some tough decisions. We will try to do so quickly as we don't want to keep you all waiting.
You will get a PM with a link to a survey. Part of it is to ask you to evaluate the performance of others if you so wish, and the other half is to ask questions about how effective the game was run. As there were 52+ players in this game (more if you include replacements), this is the easiest way for me to make sure everyone is heard who wants to.
When I post the results (i.e. who won), I will also post my general thoughts. But for the gist: I think the game turned out well, but needs to be improved quite dramatically if it's run again. Fortunately, I think a few changes can help that.
All surveys are out. A couple of people got two surveys by virtue of the fact they died and replaced in for a teammate. Those people should take the survey twice as the surveys are game specific.
I hope everyone had fun. We're hard at work determining the overall winner, but I was impressed by the teamwork of many of the participants. I hope everyone will want to play next year if we run it again.
SDC should prob win due to consistency in 4 games. Anyway this was fun and I'd play it again with some changes. Lots of fun actually, the team aspect is great and what made this something I really wanted to play.
are you thinking of me when you're with somebody else?
Zachrulez wrote:Who knew the crazy fast paced theme game would be the only town win?
Very odd result -- longer games here gave scum the advantage.
I don't know about the middle too, but it's pretty clear the longer white flag went the more demoralising the game was. The PYP game was pretty much the sweet spot of length imo, we didn't rush but we went fast, thank god it didn't last longer, though it makes me wish I'd played Psychic as it looked lots of fun Still take one for the team and all that.
are you thinking of me when you're with somebody else?
Faraday wrote:SDC should prob win due to consistency in 4 games. Anyway this was fun and I'd play it again with some changes. Lots of fun actually, the team aspect is great and what made this something I really wanted to play.
Awww <3
I completely agree. There was one point that me, SpyreX, Socio, and Fate were ALL online at the same time just screaming in the QT, spamming all over each other, yelling about stuff (I believe Socio was yelling at me not to vote singer in Psychic) and someone even made the comment that the QT was by far the best part of the game. I would be down to do this again, and like I said in the survey, there should be a few more changes made: teams should either be all public or all private, games should have unified deadlines that are a happy medium between Psychic & White Flag (or at least a better way to regulate it), and there should be ways to earn points besides just winning games since that leads to 8-way ties.