Zachrulez wrote:Be more vague please.
Some form of sensory input is telling me something about your alignment, weakly.
danceHello wrote:
@Zach: being obtuse back at the stubborn doesn't mean you win. Everyone loses.
-inHim
Duplicity wrote:I strongly dislike the concept of policy lynching.
Gut wrote:Zachrulez wrote:Be more vague please.
Some form of sensory input is telling me something about your alignment, weakly.
Duplicity wrote:DGB, if you state you now understand the advantages of the voting system can you explain your refrainment from actually taking part in it?
Duplicity wrote:...outwayed the minimal negatives which is incredibly obvious via the statement ofonlypotentially downside. DGB, if you state you now understand the advantages of the voting system can you explain your refrainment from actually taking part in it?
silavor wrote:SpyreX wrote:See how I had decent vibes from you in the before times because I kind of understood what you were up to?
All gone. In a single poof.
Is this referring to Tar or Fate?
Fate wrote:Now I was lyin in bed thinkin
"What the fuck why did Khan vig Hindu"
And I was realizing
If we all troll randomly with fuckin reads, we are POTENTIALLY giving scum two kills a night. This will DESTROY us as town, because scum will ALWAYS win if they can kill off competent players (Khan) faster than we can kill off weak/scummier players.
SO I PROPOSE:
An invictus VC. We all vote withInvictus: [Name]
Whoever is invictus hammered:
Every townie with that ability will choose that target at night, ergo no matter who scum kill that person will die.
Aka INSTEAD of giving scum a potential doublekill, we get a double LYNCH over everyone and their moms random ass scumread (which will probably only hit scum a good 25-30% of the time), I rather have POLICY VIGS instead.
silavor wrote:Because scumvor is so stupid he would go out of his way to draw attention to himself by hammering.
Right. Ok then. You keep thinking that.
Quilford wrote:VOTE: silavor
terrible hammer reeks of opportunism
I'm certain all townspeople have an Invictus kill.
Quilford wrote:DrippingGoofball wrote:Are we really letting the scum know when they can get two townies for the price of one with the NK, while avoiding being invictus'ed themselves?
What if scum are invictused?
actually, I think all players with the invictus ability should claim. does everyone agree?
Fate wrote:*skims*
that SpyreX hammer was stupid as shit
Invictus (aka not vote) Silavor
TROLOL