Mafia Invictus ~ Game Over!

[Benmage]

Are we really letting the scum know when they can get two townies for the price of one with the NK, while avoiding being invictus'ed themselves?

Its use is that of a second lynch... it is beneficial for the town. Even if its a twoforone.... that's one we don't mislynch.

But Invictus is only for NK... not for lynches...

Duhhhh.... we lynch scum A. We invictus scum B... scum B was gonna be lynched anyways. So if scum B is town we avoid a mislynch... even tho night had double kills.

Now if scum B is scum... scum are screwed.

[Quilford]

sssh

I realised it was dumb when I reread it. I don't like admitting to posting something dumb, so I'm going to go cry in a corner.

[Fate]

Are we really letting the scum know when they can get two townies for the price of one with the NK, while avoiding being invictus'ed themselves?

That's basically what I see reading this and I agree that it's a bad idea.

More scum afraid?:

SHOW YOUR TRUE COLORS TO ME ZACH

[Benmage]

Explain to me the flaw in using invictus as a second lynch please.

[DrippingGoofball]

Explain to me the flaw in using invictus as a second lynch please.

Stop humiliating me! I've already admitted that I didn't get we would all use the same target. I thought we'd announce individual targets.

[Benmage]

Rodger. We unanimously decide on a target for all.

I'm more interested in hearing from Zach if he still opposes it.

[Zachrulez]

Hmmm... actually if the invictus choice targets scum, they'd have an interesting problem with how to deal with that.

[Zachrulez]

If it's prevalent enough... basically a double day.

Sold

Invictus: Baby Spice

[Benmage]

Hmmm... actually if the invictus choice targets scum, they'd have an interesting problem with how to deal with that.

Boom goes the dynamite!

[Fate]

Explain to me the flaw in using invictus as a second lynch please.

Ben we agree on something

>_>
<_<

Let's not further soil our town win streak? (I'm tempted not to count AGM's game because of said double NKing scum team)

[Fate]

k DGB is still town/

Zach is caving scum.

KEAKEKAHEHAHHAA

[Zachrulez]

You're wrong.

KEKEKE.

[Fate]

OH WOW IVE BEEN CONVINCED

Don't worry I'll deal with you later when you stop sheeping me.

[Zachrulez]

Worry about what exactly?

[DrippingGoofball]

[invisible]If Baby Spice's next post doesn't contain 300 words, I'll Invictus her.[/invisible]

[Fate]

Worry about what exactly?

You don't have to worry about me lynching your scumbag ass TODAY.

You might need to worry about it in your qt TONIGHT about whether to kill me or not.

While you're busy with, as you put it so well and shared with us your scumfears:

, they'd have an interesting problem with how to deal with that.

[Duplicity]

The only potential downside to the invictus voting plan involves mafia having the possiblity and opportunity to manipulate the votes during the day phase to prevent themselves from being incivitused however the votes will provide massive amounts of content and interactions to read back for later in the game.

Not understanding the BabySpice votes, sure she's a weaker player however she'll be relatively easy to read correctly later in the game removing any potential gain from invictusing her early, furthermore the placement and timing of her Tarh vote and avoidance of the Spyrex wagon reads as slightly town.

[Zachrulez]

I don't have to worry about any of that because I'm not scum.

Not that I'd ever expect to convince you otherwise, because that's like running head first into a brick wall.

[Benmage]

Nonono.... reading VIs is damn near impossible.

Are they devoid of logic because they're scum ... or are they simply that bad?

Baby spice needs to go asap. Consider it a policy lynch.

[Duplicity]

I strongly dislike the concept of policy lynching, I believe I even created a thread elaborting on how it destroys and harms the game. Policy lynching means you're openely claiming that you believe randomly lynching is just as likely to hit scum as actually scumhunting. VI's aren't impossible to read at all, they're actually relatively easy. You only need to read into the motivations behind their posts and what you believe they're aiming to achieve rather than what they've actually achieved.

[Zachrulez]

I don't think we're going to get a good Baby Spice read so long as she only has one short post on record.

[Gut]

Zach feels off.

[Zachrulez]

Be more vague please.

[danceHello]

The only potential downside to the invictus voting plan involves mafia having the possiblity and opportunity to manipulate the votes during the day phase to prevent themselves from being incivitused however the votes will provide massive amounts of content and interactions to read back for later in the game.

Not understanding the BabySpice votes, sure she's a weaker player however she'll be relatively easy to read correctly later in the game removing any potential gain from invictusing her early, furthermore the placement and timing of her Tarh vote and avoidance of the Spyrex wagon reads as slightly town.

voteDuplicity

This wagon is go. Such a slimy input to the Invictus talk, mentions a negative and a positive but never a verdict. Also the stance on Baby Spice is lulzy.

@Zach: being obtuse back at the stubborn doesn't mean you win. Everyone loses.

-inHim

[Duplicity]

Zach, I wouldn't disagree that her activity is exceedingly low but considering it's only been a few hours since day two has begin and knowing that day one lasted less than a day I fail to see how you can attempt to rectify her death based on low post count.

Shift needs to come online before I head to bed, there's a few things I want to discuss with him before I forget them.

PEdit: My stance and conclusion should be incredibly obvious via the fact that I invictused voted myself.