Ranmaru wrote:Ameliaslay wrote:unvote
vote: Hiraki, Ranmaru
To answer the questions asked of my votes, by Empking. I initially placed only one vote and randomly to give myself the opportunity to look over the thread. I hadn't yet decided how I wanted to use both votes, although I thought in tandem is a little strange, as second votes might be more useful to place pressure.
To comment on one of the wagons, I was initially a bit confused by the smalls wagon-- to me he reads very newb, but not necessarily newb scum. But as the latter end of the thread progresses he seems very willing-- almost falling over himself to accomodate requests for outside of game activity on other sites.
That over-eager to please mentality strikes me wrong. I also really didn't like the comment in post #198, where he mentions that we should look tomorrow for those attacking him hardest. That being said, I don't know that this sways my balance toward a vote.
As to reasons for my current votes, I haven't really been fond of the tone of Hiraki's posts..
he seems pretty excitable early game
. However, I really haven't liked either Lowkey or Ranmaru's
method of scum-hunting
. Both of them seem to rely on a form of metagaming, that forgive me as I haven't played in a while seems like going beyond the pale. As in this post by Ranmaru:
ranmaru wrote:Actually, I was asking because before he has been set to visible. I told him I would be checking his recent posts to make sure he is following up with the game, but I didn't want to sound like a creeper. He usually jokes around and I'm fine with throwing some sillyness toward him. He knows that I have called him out and multiple others and still do. I am sad at him being invisible.
The only time I remember ever watching who's visible/not-- timestamps, etc. was as scum looking for justifications to point fingers at other players. Lowkey and Ranmaru seem to use similar logic to point fingers at smalls and redcoyote, on what I think of as weak cases, especially given my preference towards only looking in game at in game behavior.
Purple text I agree with. He was never scummy to me. *To Hiraki, I posted that quote to ask for thoughts on Smalls to see if he was doing the same or not.
Your Hiraki vote, is based on how he was excited to play? That is not good, at all. Why does that make you think he is scum?
The quote you bring up is not scum hunting, it's a clarification.
If you don't like meta-ing, why haven't you spoken of Crazy? Here is a quote:
Crazy wrote:VOTE: Ranmaru
Not really a first post I'd expect from you... I thought you'd come out guns blazing, especially with all this NK-WIFOM talk. What's up?
@Amrun - A-ight, I can believe the cell phone thing. UNVOTE: Amrun
He used it for scum hunting.
I also call out activity all the time, so I don't see how that makes me scum. (It's a null tell)
Anyways, my scumhunting isn't heavily based on meta. Currently i'm voting you and Kunkstar, both of which I have never played with. How is this meta-ing?
I never pointed fingers at RC nor Smalls. If I say "Hey RC, I see you there!" It doesn't mean I think he's scum for it, it means I want him to post.
Why did you vote Elli?
I wanted to address this post briefly before moving on...
I think you've mischaracterized my words "excitable" by painting them a suspicion of eagerness to play. You should read more, and I even think I've said-- angrily, reacting strongly, all caps, etc.
As to your comment and subsquent example of Crazy re: meta-ing, if I can perhaps explain my position further: extra game relationships feel fine to me as a form of analysis, if one believes that they can extrapolate behavior based on previous games and roles-- although I feel it's sort of a black science in that people sometimes behave in deliberate ways for deliberate reasons-- thus with more experienced players unconcscious slips are harder to catch-- This meta I'm talking about is extra game activity-- thus outside of the "pristine environment" of game play. and I don't like it.
And to address your final question, I answered that above-- random vote on Ellibereth while I was reading these massive walls of content.
To answer the semi-newb and etc. questions about my post game thread in posts 319, 320, while worthless for the purposes of this game as it was prior to any roles going out etc. I have been on this site for a long time-- though was gone for a while. This was a joke @Jelly who I used to play with quite frequently.
@Ranmaru-- let me come back to your analysis request tonight, when I have time to post in more detail.
Couple of quick comments, questions:
LK: Post 361 questions re: N0 not looking attractive, are you referencing a prior post?
Hiraki: Post 362: You haven't really addressed the logic of why posts ending in a ? are generally bad.. do tell.
Crazy: (post 377) Your analysis of kunkstar seemed a little stating the obvious... "shape up- ship out"... why bother? Content fluff?
Kunkstar: (post 381) Good catch (I think) on Pom not really saying anything other than "scummy" to move her vote from rvs to real. I'd like to hear more about this from Pom.
More later....
When I hear any man talk of an unalterable law, the only effect it produces upon me is to convince me that he is an unalterable fool.
