@Kdub-
I agree and acknowledge that my vote on you is not based on a solid 100% case.
Your assessment regarding kunk is inaccurate. I posted my thoughts about him. People commented and generally disagreed or did not want to pursue him. He has made a reasonable defense post, and then continued the sheeping/appeasement/blending. There's really no additional case at this point, except perhaps a lurker case (which is maybe the crux of your admonition?). However, I don't believe a lurker case would be effective, and I think you know that.
To be clear, you read like you are just saying, "Don't vote me! Vote your top suspect even though it'll be a waste of your vote." If you are willing to join the kunk wagon and there are others similarly interested, then I'll be glad to move. Otherwise, I'm rejecting your proposition.
@Iec-
Robo's insistence on pushing LLD despite her claim shows a very different approach to PR claims. Actually, his strong insistence on a single D1 suspect in general (while feeling genuine) is a bit extreme. It's hard to read if it is being used as a screen. I agree there is a valid case against LLD, but once she claimed investigative PR, she becomes (or should become) a low priority.
My scum read on Kunk comes from his early posts (and there's no content in recent posts to change that).
-His initial vote on Iec is ideally timed to distract from the growing LLD wagon and start a counter wagon. He claims it was a mistake, but if he wasn't called on it, I'm dubious that it would have been moved/changed.
-His switch to Kdub is blatant sheeping Spyrex while pretending he is pushing his own case (it is less effective, but also a distraction/counter to the LLD wagon).
--His
few posts with content also seem to be buddying or sheeping (and potentially aimed at dispelling the lurker tag).
-Ooba's Kdub/kunk connection is weak but also possible
