Lemming Mafia - Mini 1196

[animorpherv1]

/confirm

[animorpherv1]

vote:Chuji

Because hydra, etc.

[animorpherv1]

@Farside, let's say we have a mission called Batman as a day 2 choice and said mission appears again on day 4. The power batman gives on night 4, will it be the same power it is on night 2? Bassically I assume mission names are always for the same mission, yes?

Assuming that the mission named batman means the same thing everytime batman is a choice I think I just thought up a rather helpful town strategy. Should anyone get a mission that has no real town applications (Basically a mission that only helps scum or a mission that hurts the town, like miller) someone should claim that mission the next day. That way if that mission shows up on the selection list we can exploit it.

Step 1
Someone gets crap mission like miller and says it was crap next day.

Step 2
That mission shows up again

Step 3
we vote on who is scumiest but don't hammer

Step 4
Before hammer said scummiest person is talked into selecting crap role

Step 5
we lynch scummy players and remove crappy role from game

Step 6
If crappy role when revealed is not crappy like learned in step one, we lynch liar about role next day.

Descent plan yes?

And this is pokerface. You guys wnat us to say which of us is using the hydra account when?

If we do this, then we need a definition of crappy role. Because I know I hate Vanilla Townie more than miller.

[animorpherv1]

Yes, since I pick near the bottom, unless a sparklingly good case comes up, I'll vote the people in front of me until they pick.

Scumtastic right there.

unvote, vote PeregrineV

[animorpherv1]

It's not scumtastic; it's a manifestation of his impatience. It is not really hard to see that. Seriously -_-

No, it implies that he would hammer someone because they haven't picked yet.

[animorpherv1]

To me, it reads as a bad thing, so I'm just going to keep my vote here.

[animorpherv1]

To me, it reads as a bad thing, so I'm just going to keep my vote here.

Gut?

Yup.

[animorpherv1]

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=14677. You may not be a better vote than mike, but if M=W's behavior will suggest that he really is just voting me so he has someone to vote, then my order of suspicion goes mike>M=W>Chuji.

Oh god, you linked to four ongoing games.

Thanks for making me want to policy lynch you, really.

[animorpherv1]

Also:

@mod/all:

I will be V/LA from July 1st to 5th. I will still have access, but my posting in this thread will likely diminish a lot.

[animorpherv1]

Thanks for making me want to policy lynch you, really.

No defense for this? None? All right...

[animorpherv1]

Thanks for making me want to policy lynch you, really.

No defense for this? None? All right...

There's no defense from policy death if people turn out to care a great deadly deal about my criminal past.

Not even an "I swear I won't do it again!", Tazaro?

Alright then.

unvote, vote Tazaro

For the above + defense of Peregrine.

[animorpherv1]

Mods: Nix that. Vacation isn't until the 31st of July.

I asked you if you wanted to make any sort of defense at all. You made none.

[animorpherv1]

So, let's see:

1. You linked to FOUR ongoing games.
2. You refuse to defend yourself.
3. You defend Peregrine.

[animorpherv1]

To me, it's seemed like "OMG I've gotta find a way to defend Peregrine, I'll just call ani scummy, place a vote on him and call it a day".

[animorpherv1]

@Tazaro:

I got back from a break on February and played in like 3 games total since, 1 was a replace in. Don't you even try to stick meta on me.

[animorpherv1]

Oh hey. I'll read up in a second, but for now:

Chose: Shooter

[animorpherv1]

Well, that was fast. Peregrine and Tazaro are working together to build an absolute bullshit case.