Mina wrote:Um...
Exactly whom are you defending yourself from? The town as a whole? I didn't even mention any of those points. For so early in the day, isn't this is a bit excessive?
Mina wrote:I'm just imagining the whole "set-up speculation for the sake of talking, fake scumhunting, and useless questions" vibe
So can you tell me without checking the activity counter who has been lurking through the previous couple of DEFCONs? I can't. In a Large surely it's easiest to attack the more visible people, especially when you could treat DEFCON 5 & 4 like a glorified pre-game stage.AurorusVox wrote:"For the sake of talking"
I'm pretty sure scum could just shut up and fly under the radar if they wanted. There's no incentive to talk for the sake of it.
"Set-up speculation"
Why is your promised-but-failed attempt at setup breaking any better than my attempt at neutering the usefulness of Sub?
"Fake scumhunting, and useless questions"
I questioned SJ because they were being (to use SDC's fave word) cheeky. All this "Oh I'm being sarcastic about you Mina" bullshit is cheeky because it's noise that doesn't stick to them. Their flipflopping between "Don't make my points look less than serious!" --> "It was a fucking joke" makes it impossible to pin them on anything they said about you there.
Mina wrote:Actually, now that you bring it up, I hated the sub thing, too. It's not an attempt at neuter the usefulness of Sub, because your plan was actually harmful to the town. (I mean...saying town shouldn't get the sub just so we know whether or not the submarine is definitely in scum hands? Having the sub and USING IT TO SHOOT OBVTOWN WHILE NOT CLAIMING IT ismoreof a scum claim.)
><" No, that wasn't what I was saying at all. I was saying that in my scenario, we WOULD KNOW scum had it, and so when it came to launch-time, anyone who launched a nuke but somehow didn't have their name attached to it, would be caught out. I.e. it would have made it impossible for scum to use the secret aspect of the daykill because to do so WOULD have been a scumclaim.
Mina wrote:It's almost so bad that it might be a towntell that you werebraveenough to say it, but I hate how you backtracked the moment you got heat for it and said, "yeah, I wasn't expecting anyone to take me seriously, because it's just a pipe dream, so go for that submarine, town!").
Because I realised quickly how idealistic it was, and to debate it would have been a waste of time. A good idea in my head, but a bad idea in the thread.
Mina wrote:But I didn't evenmentionit in that post. So why are you trying to tie it to me not breaking the set-up?
You mentioned that you thought I was using set-up speculation as an excuse to talk. The Sub is the only real setup spec I've been doing.
So are you still suspicious of his towntell of you? By making that joke post it totally deflected away from the issue you were trying to raise.Mina wrote:For the record, whatever you think of SJ, I can state with 100% certainty that he was not in the slightest attempting to be taken seriously with his "case" on me, if you know anything about Faraday's sense of humour. The "why aren't you taking me seriously" line was also dripping with scorn.
Mina wrote:And no incentive for scum to talk? Are you kidding me? Try not posting anything all game and see how long you live in DEFCON 1. That's exactly what scum try to do all the time: look like they're helping the town just to get their approval. Fake contribution is the rare scumtell that actuallyworks.
Since lack of posting isn't a scumtell to you, what do you make of Magua saying he'll nuke the person with the lowest postcount?