EDIT: Given the fact that the night was over a weekend, I have extended the night deadline to
Mini 277 - Webcomic Mafia - Game Over!
-
-
Aelyn Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 774
- Joined: November 6, 2004
- Location: Birmingham, UK
-
-
Aelyn Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 774
- Joined: November 6, 2004
- Location: Birmingham, UK
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
TSAGod Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 496
- Joined: September 20, 2005
- Location: Pennsylvania
-
-
Thok Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Disgrace to SKs everywhere
- Posts: 7013
- Joined: March 28, 2005
-
-
Adele Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: October 13, 2005
- Location: Not in any Large games, that's for darn sure!
-
-
bertrand Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 913
- Joined: December 6, 2005
-
-
Adele Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Big Sister
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: October 13, 2005
- Location: Not in any Large games, that's for darn sure!
Should he? How do you know the scum can't choose who to send out? Or maybe you're scum and know the lack of kill had nothing to do with a roleblocker.bertrand wrote:The Roleblocker should probably aim at the same person again and see what happens.FOS: bertrand. That post could easily have positive intention behind it, but it could just as easily be scummy.-
-
TSAGod Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 496
- Joined: September 20, 2005
- Location: Pennsylvania
-
-
Fuldu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: January 26, 2004
The roleblocker shouldn't out themself on the off chance that they were the reason for the lack of a kill. Too many other possible explanations, not the least of which is that the scum have second win conditions that make choosing not to kill a feasible strategy.TSAGod wrote:If a roleblocker did stop it, would it make sense to out themselves for the scum? The doctor may have done it instead, but it could net us a quick scum.
The only reason I would want a roleblocker to come out at this stage is if they blocked the same person both nights. Then there's a good chance they've found scum. Otherwise, the odds aren't to the town's benefit at this point.It takes a village to raise a lynch mob.-
-
Pie_is_good Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: December 21, 2003
- Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh
QFT.Fuldu wrote: The roleblocker shouldn't out themself on the off chance that they were the reason for the lack of a kill. Too many other possible explanations, not the least of which is that the scum have second win conditions that make choosing not to kill a feasible strategy.
It's too early to determine anything from Roleblockers claiming, and it's entirely possible that the roleblocker, should there be one, isn't responsible for the kills (or lack thereof).I am a stand-up dude of genuine flyness.-
-
bertrand Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 913
- Joined: December 6, 2005
-
-
Fuldu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: January 26, 2004
Except that in the long run that's a bad strategy.bertrand wrote:
That's why I said to aim at the same person again.Fuldu wrote:The only reason I would want a roleblocker to come out at this stage is if they blocked the same person both nights. Then there's a good chance they've found scum. Otherwise, the odds aren't to the town's benefit at this point.Ifthe roleblocker did that, then I'd want to know about it because in this particular instance it might mean we got lucky. But that doesn't mean that a roleblockershoulddo that.It takes a village to raise a lynch mob.-
-
Akonas Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 681
- Joined: October 29, 2005
-
-
Nemesis Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Posts: 492
- Joined: December 15, 2005
Yeah, sorry about that Akonas.
Bertrand has been acting fairly scummily all through this game, I don't know if he's scum, town or something in the middle. Guiding power roles is not usually a good idea.
Besides, we must have more than an SK to worry about...
If the roleblocker + the doc were lucky then neither of them might know which night they were lucky on anyway. I think we should stop trying to guide the power roles, I also think powerroles shouldn't come out yet.
If the roleblocker wasn't lucky and roleblocked the same person twice then it was the doc who was lucky and the roleblocker will make us lynch the wrong person as well as make the doc protect him in future thus giving scum a free kill.[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=414662#414662]Damnit, Nemesis.[/url]-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
All this talk of power roles is a bit useless. The only people who can judge whether to come forward or not are the roleblocker/docs themselves. They have the information, not the town.
Eh? That's not even how cults work.TSAGod wrote:If there isn't a nightkill element, then what's to stop us from no lynching everyday so we all become cult members and win?
Also, I think Thok's point was that we might have a cult instead of an SK to partially explain the lack of nightkills. Again, speculation is a bit useless. We need solid evidence, people!-
-
TSAGod Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 496
- Joined: September 20, 2005
- Location: Pennsylvania
Okay...I'll claim then. I'm the cult leader....[/sarcasm]VitaminR wrote:Also, I think Thok's point was that we might have a cult instead of an SK to partially explain the lack of nightkills. Again, speculation is a bit useless. We need solid evidence, people!
um...vote Thokfor getting us off of lynching scum and instead getting us to figure the setup out, based on one lynch and a lack of kills.-
-
Pie_is_good Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Massclaim_is_Good
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: December 21, 2003
- Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh
-
-
Fuldu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: January 26, 2004
I don't see Thok as having proposed any sort of strategy at all. He merely suggested the existence of a cult. bertrand was the one proposing a risky short-term strategy.Pie_is_good wrote:I'll agree with TSA on this one.
Vote: Thok
Basing a risky short-term strategy on very limited information is bad play.
As of now, though, I'm not sure if I want to vote bertrand for that or vote Pie for placing a vote on the basis of an inapplicable argument.It takes a village to raise a lynch mob.-
-
Nemesis Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Posts: 492
- Joined: December 15, 2005
Pie was a sheep, TSAGod had the weird reason. 3 potential lynchs, I'd rather go for Bertrand out of the three but I am in no hurry to vote.As of now, though, I'm not sure if I want to vote bertrand for that or vote Pie for placing a vote on the basis of an inapplicable argument.[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=414662#414662]Damnit, Nemesis.[/url]-
-
StevieT92 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 934
- Joined: March 8, 2005
-
-
Fuldu Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2369
- Joined: January 26, 2004
TSAGod's reason for voting isn't a great one, but his description of Thok's actions is factually accurate. Thok did move the discussion toward issues of setup, even if in what I would consider a fairly harmless way. Pie was saying he was promoting a "strategy," which is at odds with any interpretation I can come up with for Thok's posts.Nemesis wrote:Pie was a sheep, TSAGod had the weird reason. 3 potential lynchs, I'd rather go for Bertrand out of the three but I am in no hurry to vote.It takes a village to raise a lynch mob.-
-
VitaminR Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3668
- Joined: November 14, 2005
- Location: Somerville, MA
Well, at least that sarcastic remark was justified and appropriate.TSAGod wrote:Okay...I'll claim then. I'm the cult leader....[/sarcasm]
Whoa.. 3 potential lynches? Based on that?Nemesis wrote:Pie was a sheep, TSAGod had the weird reason. 3 potential lynchs, I'd rather go for Bertrand out of the three but I am in no hurry to vote.
Vote: Nemesisfor limiting the town's scope based solely on two votes on a slow day 2 and a new player's eccentric behaviour.-
-
Nemesis Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Dammit, Nemesis
- Posts: 492
- Joined: December 15, 2005
I was saying that for those couple of posts there was a number of people who had said something scummy and I didn't want to speedlynch any of them. That means I was doing the opposite of what you are saying... I was saying we shouldn't lynch any of them now and we should keep this in mind. Lynches this early in the day mean hardly anyone has to actually say something that could come across scummy.
In case you forgot I defended Pie earlier and said Bertrand was acting scummily earlier as well... I also voted for TSAGod. None of those actions did a lot and we ended up lynching someone else because they wouldn't claim. I feel that if we let people slide then we will do the same thing so keep this is in mind later, but I also feel that some people who don't really post are just avoiding suspicion totally and we shouldn't allow that to happen either. I will vote later, just not yet... I want more discussion before we consider lynching someone and because I want more discussion it means that I am not limiting the town's scope as you say I am...[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=414662#414662]Damnit, Nemesis.[/url]-
-
bertrand Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 913
- Joined: December 6, 2005
What the hell, I just made a suggestion.StevieT92 wrote:Vote: Bertrand. I just generally think he's scummy, and too controlling.
If you think it's a bad idea, tell me. But I still think the role blocker should aim wherever he did again, as it could net us a quick scum. I don't see how that's a bad strategy. Someone explain it please.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.