Tragedy wrote:At least Amrun got the right track on Smargaret.
Smargaret wrote:Right now it's Amrun/DB/Ranger/Kcd for me, the last three may shift some.
Smargaret wrote:1. Amrun
2. DB/Mist
3.
4. Ranger
5. KCD
6. Chrono
7. Grey
Funny how Mist suddenly gets into the list.
This is explained in the bit that you quoted right below ...
Smarg wrote:I find it amusing (read: scummy) that Mist pops in, posts fluff, votes to lynch, and doesn't provide a list or ask any sort of question. Also, the two questions she's asked have not been followed up on at all - there's definitely something going on as far as Mist not contributing. The reason she and DB are tied for second is because I have more to go on from DB (so I'm more confident in my read), and a DB flip would be more informative in terms of connections than a Mist flip, but Mist is slightly more likely to be scum (very slightly, IMO, but Mist has done more scummy things - I just can't be as certain that they're legitimately scum-motivated and not Mist being Mist) and I haven't figured out which way the balance should tip.
I find it real amusing that Smarg provides a list AFTER Mist comes in.
I see no 'Motives'... Ahem, 'Why' they should be lynched...
Although Smarg marks Amrun as top scum read, where the hell is the good reason?
The list was a formalization of things I'd been saying the whole day long. It should have been perfectly obvious why I was more suspicious of some people than others without having to spell it out - nobody else did, in fact, so why am I the only one scummy for it? This is either confirmation bias or a manufactured case.
Why is when I posted a list relevant? Time meta comes down to a bunch of things, from when someone is online, what time zone you live in, whether you're checking in from a phone or actually have access to a computer ... time meta just sucks as an argument, and I don't see you explaining how that's even scummy.
The "good reason" for Amrun as top scum read was the SAME ONE I'D BEEN GOING ON ABOUT ALL DAY LONG - namely, the interactions with KCD.
Smarg wrote:Amrun - scum 101 is to find a townie being wagoned hard and say "Gee, I don't think X is scum, I think they're town." Then you get bonus points when X is inevitably lynched and flips town - you weren't on the wagon, in fact you were against it. You certainly fit the "wagoned hard" part of the definition, and if you flip town, then the whole scenario fits.
This only reason came AFTER she keeps saying Amrun is the top scum tell. Really. At least we get the reason.. WAY after you keep saying she's scum...
Again, I don't see how this is scummy. And it wasn't the only/first time I gave a reason for Amrun scum.
Then, smarg comes in and says Zinger's so scummy without any reason as well. Along with Chronopie.
How the hell imaginality came into the scums list?
How the hell Maxous fails to make up for Chronopie, although he's actually doing a bit better than him?
Why did you originally call back the "AMRUN/KCD" scum tell earlier?
I just noticed smarg never really mentioned myself. -Gulp-
Trying to read.
1. Zinger committed the Amished tell. Is that not reason enough? And Chronopie was fluff posting.
2. Can you point out the Imaginality thing please? And please either leave the quote intact or provide a post number.
3. Chronopie was scummy. Maxous came in as a replacement, and his behavior was mildly scummy. Combine that with Chronopie being scummy, and you don't have someone scummy for flaking, you have a scummy playerslot. You know what we do with scummy playerslots? We lynch them.
4. There is scum in that exchange with Amrun and KCD. I've gone back and forth on where/how many, but I do believe that exchange wasn't TvT. I don't want it lost/overlooked.
Amrun looks even worse after that explanation - I only knew about her town PR in [redacted], which she didn't address. Can we lynch her please?