VPB wrote:lol, you fucking mad? I was pushing quadz lynch since the game started.
Let’s examine this statement, shall we.
Day 1 play of VPB regarding Quadz
–
Votes for Quadz in
ISO 0 (first post). Read that post. He devotes much more attention to Nicki Minaj than Quadz. His ‘main reason’ that bugged him about quadz was his defensiveness. Specifically asks “Does he always play defensively like this when he’s town?”
Yet he drops the vote on quadz.
His next direct mention of quadz is ISO 13. Before then his ISO contains discussion with me and Sotty, questioning AGM about his ‘Policy Lynch’, calling obv-Town Gamma Town. In ISO 13 he answers Faraday’s question seeking to clarify his question about quadz in ISO 0 and then says he’ll stop posting “for the sake of the Town”.
Next direct mention is ISO 16 where he wants to know why Singer isn’t voting quadz. Here is said ISO -
VPB ISO 16 wrote:I want to know why singer isn't voting quadz...the person she can read like a book and thinks is scum
Very, very soft suggestion that Singer is scummy for this.
Next mention of quadz is ISO 29 where he answers an accusation from quadz saying that he (VPB) was not waffling.
Day ends at ISO 30. Read for yourself but his entire Day 1 isn’t pushing quadz. He dropped a vote on him and mentioned him at all the rest of the Day. No pressure at all.
Day 2 play of VPB regarding Quadz
–
Votes Quadz immediately Day 2 calling him obv-scum. This is a stark contrast to his Day 1 play. If anything it looks like an over-reaction to Mothrax’s modkill which cut Day 1 short before VPB could establish ‘cred’ for his quadz vote by expressing actual suspicion.
VPB ISO 37 wrote:re:quadz - a fairly explicit case was laid out by Seraphim yesterday, but I really don't see how anyone can not see pretty much everything he posts as scummy. From his obsessive self defense to that horribad "case" he made on DDD...give me a break.
Note the piggy-backing on Seraphim’s case as a way to avoid the fact he didn’t push quadz at all. Also smells completely of pre-knowledge that quadz was scum. Aka bussing.
He then proceeds to call out others regarding their play regarding quadz before a confirmed flip.
VPB ISO 48 wrote:re: quadz - if you felt that strongly about his wagon, you certainly didn't seem to be doing a lot to try to stop it yesterday.
I wanted to highlight this snippet from ISO 48. Note that he’s attacking me for not defending quadz strongly Day 1. Yet despite his Day 2 “Quadz is Obv-scum” stance his ISO shows he did absolutely nothing to push quadz Day1. Inconsistency.
He does have a small interaction with quadz at ISO 51 but mostly spends his time questioning others about their quadz intereactions as opposed to strongly pushing the lynch.
TL – DR
: This is hardly “strong pushing” of quadz. He dropped a vote on him Day 1 and left it there with no quadz interaction. Came out Day 2 saying quadz was obv-scum and has been wanting to ride that position since.
VPB wrote:I fucking called singer out for her avoidance of the wagon. I called hito as scum since a long time ago. I guess I have to lynch the entire team to be town. You're crazy. I like you, but you're crazy.
I’ve already quoted your ‘call out’ of Singer from ISO 16. It’s about as soft a call-out as you can get. Let’s look at your other quotes surrounding Singer and hito –
VPB ISO 17 wrote:Well, he hasn't posted anything else, so her reads have no reason to change...or not be voting.
This is in regards to Singer not voting quadz. Again, no mention that she is scummy. Just soft positioning.
VPB ISO 25 wrote:If parama flips scum, hito should be lynched next probs.
Says hito should be lynched IF Parama flips scum. More soft suspicion that he can back away from the minute Parama flips Town.
VPB ISO 31 wrote:I think hito and Plum look pretty damn scummy and I'd be willing to lynch them after quadz is dead. Signer I'm up in the air on because I kind of feel like she is paying lip service to the quadz wagon after it got serious backing.
Says hito is scum and he would lynch him. Note the soft position on Signer. Now think about the upcoming Neighborizor claim regarding quadz.
VPB ISO 32 wrote:Also with singer, I didn't like how hard she was trying to discredit people calling mothrax town.
More soft positioning. He doesn’t call her scummy for it … just says he doesn’t like it. Perfect language to move of it (“I said I didn’t like not that she was scummy”) if things move away from Singer-as-scum but to point to and say “I was suspicious” if she ever flips.
VPB ISO 36 wrote:Anyhow, re: hito - his play is pretty empty so far other than some rambly strategy talk that made little sense, a weird push on AGM that turned into backing off later and avoidance of lynching quadz, who is scum.
Most solid suspicion of either hito or Singer thus far.
Has a solid interaction with hito at ISO 51 and 52.
VPB ISO 53 wrote:Why is signer posting without voting?
Again another very open statement that can be used to go either way if he needs to attack Singer or absolve her.
TL - DR:
The hito suspicion looks much more credible than the Singer suspicion. The words scummy or scum never appear in any of VPB's statements on Singer.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.